Community
Wiki Posts
Search

No Joking about Security Theater

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2013, 7:25 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 574
No Joking about Security Theater

TSA loudspeakers threaten travelers with arrest for joking about security
Federal propaganda messages echo through the airport, reminding citizens not to speak out against the blueshirts.

Posted on October 10, 2013
http://www.policestateusa.com/2013/t...king-security/

HOUSTON, TX — Travelers are reporting threatening messages coming from the loudspeakers of the Travel Security Administration. The TSA has been broadcasting warnings that people will be arrested for making jokes in the presence of the infamous federal checkpoint agents. Policestateusa.com has obtained exclusive audio of the threats.

Matt Miller said on the morning of September 20th, during his return trip from Colorado to Florida, he spent a few hours in Houston waiting for a connecting flight. Sitting at the George Bush Intercontinental Airport, he repeatedly heard a TSA audio message on the intercom that disturbed him.

“…You are also reminded that any inappropriate remarks or jokes concerning security may result in your arrest.”
yandosan is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 7:50 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
First off TSA can't arrest anyone and local police would need a valid charge to arrest the joker. I don't see how this kind of thing makes the public perception of TSA improve and I would suggest it only continues to erode any goodwill TSA has remaining.

Here is TSA's problem in a nutshell:

The TSA has never been bashful about violating people’s rights. The agency’s entire job description is to search travelers without probable cause or a warrant. Their intrusive searches, abusive treatment of travelers, ineptitude, and penchant for stealing have made them a source of disdain and a butt of jokes since the TSA’s inception in 2002.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 9:47 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Programs: AA PLT, 1.8mm
Posts: 6,988
Originally Posted by yandosan
“…You are also reminded that any inappropriate remarks or jokes concerning security may result in your arrest.”
or again....they may not. (nice idle threat there).

so who exactly is the grand supreme judge of what is "inappropriate" ?
cynicAAl is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 9:58 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,162
I'm not reading anything into this other than it sounds like the typical warning to not say "bomb" or "hijack" within earshot of a clerk. I think most of us stopped doing this sometime in 1975.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 12:42 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 574
I'm not reading anything into this other than it sounds like the typical warning to not say "bomb" or "hijack" within earshot of a clerk


Well, it's intentionally vaguely worded so that stupid people think they now cannot make jokes about TSA and other airport goons.
yandosan is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 1:29 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by yandosan
Well, it's intentionally vaguely worded so that stupid people think they now cannot make jokes about TSA and other airport goons.
Well ... how would you word it more precisely, then? Because there's no limit to the number of sarcastic remarks that a passenger could make about the screening process, and cataloging them all would be folly.

Personally, I rate this very low on my objections to TSA's procedures. If someone comes up to a checkpoint and voluntarily says "I have a bomb in my backpack", do you really want a TSO to judge whether or not the statement is a joke?

And ... depending on the jurisdiction, they may be right. In Michigan, for example, joking about a bomb in your luggage might be a felony --- at least as I read Michigan law (disclaimer: IANAL):

Originally Posted by Michigan Penal Code, 750.204a
(emphasis added)

A person who, with the intent to terrorize, frighten, intimidate, threaten, harass, or annoy any other person, possesses, delivers, sends, transports, or places a device that is constructed to represent an explosive, incendiary device, or bomb, or that is presented as an explosive, incendiary device, or bomb, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $3,000.00, or both.

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(4xb...e=mcl-750-204a
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 2:57 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
Well ... how would you word it more precisely, then? Because there's no limit to the number of sarcastic remarks that a passenger could make about the screening process, and cataloging them all would be folly.

Personally, I rate this very low on my objections to TSA's procedures. If someone comes up to a checkpoint and voluntarily says "I have a bomb in my backpack", do you really want a TSO to judge whether or not the statement is a joke?

And ... depending on the jurisdiction, they may be right. In Michigan, for example, joking about a bomb in your luggage might be a felony --- at least as I read Michigan law (disclaimer: IANAL):
Agree on joking about bombs and such but calling TSA a Band of Idiots or such isn't a crime.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 3:41 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,520
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Agree on joking about bombs and such but calling TSA a Band of Idiots or such isn't a crime.
Exactly. And given the wording of the PA announcement, and years of listening to TSA management whine to the National Security Staff about how the public was verbally abusing their personnel and not showing proper respect, I have no doubt some overeager TSA manager will someday exceed his or her authority and start suppressing the First A rights of passengers.
halls120 is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 4:42 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Agree on joking about bombs and such but calling TSA a Band of Idiots or such isn't a crime.
So "please don't joke about your luggage, but feel free to call us names." Yeah, that'll work as a PA announcement ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 5:44 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
So "please don't joke about your luggage, but feel free to call us names." Yeah, that'll work as a PA announcement ...
If they can't do a better job of wordsmithing, they should either shelve it or make darn sure somebody with a chip on his/her shoulder doesn't use it as a basis for acting stupid.

After all, TSOs have been known to crack 'jokes' at the checkpoint that could get a pax in serious trouble.

That's the problem with 'zero tolerance - no common sense allowed'. If you're going to have a zero tolerance zone, it has to apply equally to pax and TSOs.
chollie is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 6:25 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by chollie
After all, TSOs have been known to crack 'jokes' at the checkpoint that could get a pax in serious trouble.

That's the problem with 'zero tolerance - no common sense allowed'. If you're going to have a zero tolerance zone, it has to apply equally to pax and TSOs.
I completely agree.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 6:29 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
I completely agree.
Mind you, I'd rather see common sense prevail. If some first-time/dim bulb flyer gets told to remove his jacket and he (ill-advisedly) cracks 'What? You think I got a bomb in here or something?', it doesn't have to be escalated into something it's not (a genuine threat, setting off a panic, bla-bla).

Same reason I personally don't have a problem with an otherwise-professional TSO rolling his/her eyes as he/she confiscates my water because it's 'a potentially dangerous item'.
chollie is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 6:35 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
So "please don't joke about your luggage, but feel free to call us names." Yeah, that'll work as a PA announcement ...
I don't see a need for the PA announcement.

TSA either needs to toughen up a bit or learn how to do its job. As long as TSA comes across as a third rate comedy troup the jokes and names will continue.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 7:31 pm
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I don't see a need for the PA announcement.

TSA either needs to toughen up a bit or learn how to do its job. As long as TSA comes across as a third rate comedy troup the jokes and names will continue.
Somebody makes big $$ off those PA announcements -the equipment, updates to the content, maintenance contracts.

(I resent it as a taxpayer - I pay for these useless and annoying PAs. The worst offenders, in some ways, are the completely indefensible ones that assault you as you come in from the parking garage - a welcome message to the terminal. Please, I'm going to get bombarded soon enough!
chollie is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2013, 10:22 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by chollie
Mind you, I'd rather see common sense prevail. If some first-time/dim bulb flyer gets told to remove his jacket and he (ill-advisedly) cracks 'What? You think I got a bomb in here or something?', it doesn't have to be escalated into something it's not (a genuine threat, setting off a panic, bla-bla).
The problem with that is how the rest of the country would react, not TSA. All you need is some other passenger observing the situation and shouting "he said he's got a bomb and you're letting him through?!?!?", and now you've got yourself a PR nightmare. Or, heaven forbid, the passenger joking about the bomb in their jacket actually has a bomb in their jacket ... and now you've got the TSA trying to explain why they didn't catch it when the passenger confessed to having a bomb at the checkpoint.

"Common sense" and "out of an abundance of caution" are pretty much polar opposites in this situation. Until you eliminate the latter phrase from the world of commercial airline security, you'll never see the former.
jkhuggins is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.