Denied Entry to Costa Rica
#17
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,821
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,691
I think this belongs in another forum, perhaps Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety Issues or Destinations > Americas > Central America. There's nothing United-specific or MileagePlus relevant here.
You are the only person responsible for having the appropriate documentation to enter a country.
I bet the Costa Rican embassy or consulate could have told you the letter was not acceptable, if you had asked before travel. That's what they're for.
I bet the Costa Rican embassy or consulate could have told you the letter was not acceptable, if you had asked before travel. That's what they're for.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 12,481
Many threads of posters blaming airlines for denied boarding while they, in their view, had valid travel documents. Now, posters also blaming airlines for allowing them to travel while not possessing valid travel documents.
Some thread I can think of:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...nsit-visa.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/jal-m...tnam-visa.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...ding-visa.html
Funny world.
Some thread I can think of:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...nsit-visa.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/jal-m...tnam-visa.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...ding-visa.html
Funny world.
Last edited by TerryK; Apr 6, 2013 at 3:49 pm
#20
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
1. This isn't about fault, it's about responsibility.
2. It is 100% the responsibility of the traveler to have in hand the correct entry documents as determined by the country to which entry is sought. If CR requires, as it apparently does, a green card with at least 6 months' validity, that's what's required. If OP didn't have that, as the CR website notes, all he needed was a tourist visa.
3. As others note, UA checks docs in order to protect itself. Here UA may well have been or will be fined.
To add insult to injury, UA may well come after OP for both any fine which is imposed and the walk-up fare for the "must fly" back.
2. It is 100% the responsibility of the traveler to have in hand the correct entry documents as determined by the country to which entry is sought. If CR requires, as it apparently does, a green card with at least 6 months' validity, that's what's required. If OP didn't have that, as the CR website notes, all he needed was a tourist visa.
3. As others note, UA checks docs in order to protect itself. Here UA may well have been or will be fined.
To add insult to injury, UA may well come after OP for both any fine which is imposed and the walk-up fare for the "must fly" back.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 12,481
Airlines are to blame if anything goes wrong. It is neither the immigration authorities, nor the passengers' responsibilities.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Programs: AA PLT, 1.8mm
Posts: 6,988
#24
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: UA General
Posts: 334
dreamfool - sorry to hear about your situation. I hope you manage to have your (much needed by the sound of it) holiday somewhere else.
I just checked the embassy for Costa Rica (US site), and their rules are pretty clear, which I have copied below. It seems you must have a green card, valid for six months:
I just checked the embassy for Costa Rica (US site), and their rules are pretty clear, which I have copied below. It seems you must have a green card, valid for six months:
You were in the right here - I am very familiar with the letter to which you refer, and it absolutely does extend your US permanent residency for 1 year while the case is being processed. There is no stamp involved.
Since you mention a 3 month window for the renewal, I presume you had a conditional green card previously and you were filing the petition to have the conditions removed?
This page confirms that the letter is sufficient: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memo...ensn120203.pdf
Since you mention a 3 month window for the renewal, I presume you had a conditional green card previously and you were filing the petition to have the conditions removed?
This page confirms that the letter is sufficient: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memo...ensn120203.pdf
1. This isn't about fault, it's about responsibility.
2. It is 100% the responsibility of the traveler to have in hand the correct entry documents as determined by the country to which entry is sought. If CR requires, as it apparently does, a green card with at least 6 months' validity, that's what's required. If OP didn't have that, as the CR website notes, all he needed was a tourist visa.
3. As others note, UA checks docs in order to protect itself. Here UA may well have been or will be fined.
To add insult to injury, UA may well come after OP for both any fine which is imposed and the walk-up fare for the "must fly" back.
2. It is 100% the responsibility of the traveler to have in hand the correct entry documents as determined by the country to which entry is sought. If CR requires, as it apparently does, a green card with at least 6 months' validity, that's what's required. If OP didn't have that, as the CR website notes, all he needed was a tourist visa.
3. As others note, UA checks docs in order to protect itself. Here UA may well have been or will be fined.
To add insult to injury, UA may well come after OP for both any fine which is imposed and the walk-up fare for the "must fly" back.
Last edited by dreamfool; Apr 7, 2013 at 6:45 am Reason: merge consecutive posts
#26
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,331
#27
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
#28
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,331
#29
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California. USA
Posts: 1,404
Many years I ago I and my son went into a immigration office in California to remover our conditional green card to a resident card.
I was told by the female immigration officer that it would take 3-4 months for the new card to arraive in the mail.
In the mean time we could travel outside USA without a problem since we still had the permit in our passports.
We flew to Sweden for a months . Coming back to USA we got stopped by immigration asked why we flew without the residentcard. They admitted that they knew it would take months for it to come. And according to this immigration officer it was not ok to travel with just a stamp in the passport.
He also stated that he did not agree or approved of CA. way of doing it.
Even if CA. was the one issuing it.
So it sometimes depends on the immigration officer what they will do.
I was told by the female immigration officer that it would take 3-4 months for the new card to arraive in the mail.
In the mean time we could travel outside USA without a problem since we still had the permit in our passports.
We flew to Sweden for a months . Coming back to USA we got stopped by immigration asked why we flew without the residentcard. They admitted that they knew it would take months for it to come. And according to this immigration officer it was not ok to travel with just a stamp in the passport.
He also stated that he did not agree or approved of CA. way of doing it.
Even if CA. was the one issuing it.
So it sometimes depends on the immigration officer what they will do.
#30
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
It's not up to the airline to ensure you have everything you need to get into a country. It's up to the traveler. Yes the airline checks documents, but just because they let you on the plane doesn't mean you can get into the country. It's always the traveler's responsibility to have the proper documents they need to enter the country they are visiting.
This is just silly. You are lucky they didn't charge you a one way walk up fare to get you home.
UA took me there and back, as promised, so I doubt they would return my miles + fees back either.