Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSA Area Director Concedes Scanner Images Extremely Graphic

TSA Area Director Concedes Scanner Images Extremely Graphic

Old Aug 10, 2011, 11:12 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SJC
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by Superguy
Screening was done to TSA standards. Otherwise, the planes aren't permitted to enter US airspace.
The standards at the time, perhaps.

At this time, I am not required to be screened according to TSA standards to fly back to the US. I do not have to pass through a NoS or have a full patdown. Nobody asks me my name or my destination. And unless I have shoes that are likely to have metal in them, I do not have to take them off.
SFOSpiff is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 11:23 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Originally Posted by Pesky Monkey
Don't worry. Soon a TSA spokesman/woman will simply announce that he "misspoke".
now we now beyond a shadow of a doubt why Rolando Negrin got upset.


some things could no longer be denied.


"could be shown to little kids". Blogdad Bob should be arrested for conspiracy to corrupt minors.
nachtnebel is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 4:58 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Anyone challenging TSA about WBI in court should call TSA area director Pat Ahlstrom as a witness. I would like to see how he would try to weasel out of his statement while under oath.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 4:59 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by nachtnebel
now we now beyond a shadow of a doubt why Rolando Negrin got upset.


some things could no longer be denied.


"could be shown to little kids". Blogdad Bob should be arrested for conspiracy to corrupt minors.
First fired for gross violations of integrity.

Last edited by Boggie Dog; Aug 11, 2011 at 7:44 am
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 8:17 am
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,162
"They were graphic, no doubt about it," TSA area director Pat Ahlstrom said of the old scans. "Now, they don't have to be concerned that a private image will be viewed by a TSA officer."
That big jackwagon Ahlstrom is simply spinning the new software story to convince the public to use the machines.

Colorado Springs Airport will obtain the software in a few months...
Crap -- COS used to be a safe airport without any Cancer Machines. Are they now installed and operational? I haven't been there since last April.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 8:48 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 283
Hmm. reminds me a joke:

Q: How can you tell when a TSO is lying?

A: His/her lips are moving.


DY...T???
mulieri is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 9:05 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
It's truly disturbing to try to sort out the disparity between references to this images as both "preschool friendly" and "graphic."
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 9:21 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by TheGolfWidow
It's truly disturbing to try to sort out the disparity between references to this images as both "preschool friendly" and "graphic."
I have no problem sorting it out, the person who called the Strip Search Machine images preschool friendly very likely lied.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 9:56 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I have no problem sorting it out, the person who called the Strip Search Machine images preschool friendly very likely lied.
That's among the disturbing possibilities.
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 12:09 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Originally Posted by PhoenixRev
Paging Blogger Bob.

Please pick up the "I'm humbly apologize for not being truthful when I said the images from the WBI were ready for the cover of Reader's Digest and to be handed out at your local preschool" phone.
I seriously doubt that BB has ever done anything "humbly."

Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
First fired for gross violations of integrity.
I hear "knowingly giving a false impression" is popular these days.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 1:23 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by SFOSpiff
The standards at the time, perhaps.

At this time, I am not required to be screened according to TSA standards to fly back to the US. I do not have to pass through a NoS or have a full patdown. Nobody asks me my name or my destination. And unless I have shoes that are likely to have metal in them, I do not have to take them off.
As always, Some Airports Do, Some Airports Don't. Each one is different.

I don't have to go thru a lot of that BS at certain US airports, at others I do (aside from the mandatory shoe carnival). It doesn't necessarily mean that TSA standards aren't enforced. It's probably the "unpredictability" factor.
Superguy is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2011, 4:13 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 175
So they lied about the graphic nature of the images. How truthful are they being about the health risks regarding the AIT?
Rondall is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2011, 4:59 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LGA
Programs: Double Unobtainium, Grace L. Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Co.
Posts: 154
The photo accompanying the linked article depicts the screen that the NoS operator supposedly sees, at least as of 2009.

Two thoughts:
1.) Isn't that prohibited? TSA says photographing everything is okay EXCEPT X-ray or NoS screens;
2.) Note that the brightness control on the screen is turned all the way down. I wonder what this obscures that would normally be visible.
Vidiot is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2011, 5:45 pm
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: One Pass Gold, Delta Medallion , Avis, Hertz, Budget, most hotels
Posts: 462
Allof this reminds me of the childhood story, "The Emperor's New Clothes", where the Emperor gets sold invisible clothes that aren't really there and everyone pretends they see them except a child who correctly points out that he is naked.

TSA is relying on an endless stream of lies to convince travelers that they don't really see or experience what their senses tell them they do. The deny, deny, deny strategy that has proven so reliable it keeps being employed. It worked for Clinton in the Lewinsky scandal and for countless other politicians and agencies in the past.

We all know what they saw based on the images from the same machines when used on baggage. The guns and other devices in the bags were revealed in photographic quality. It is simply a matter of time before these naked images make their way to the internet at which time TSA will claim that they "no longer do that", i.e. will be using privacy software, and act as though the past transgressions were no big deal.

There needs to be an investigation of TSA that results in the prosecution of Pistole, Napolitano and the high ranking managers within DHS and TSA. Hopefully the next Administration or Congress will bring this to fruition and put these creeps in jail where they belong.
Fisher1949 is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2011, 8:05 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
Originally Posted by Pesky Monkey
Don't worry. Soon a TSA spokesman/woman will simply announce that he "misspoke".
I'd like to see a spokesperson declare an Area Director misspoke. That position is within spitting distance of the Asst Admin of Security Operations, so they better be real careful, saying something like that... unless they were told to.
sbagdon is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.