Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Sign in using an external account

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 19, 11, 10:36 am   #1
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kryptonium Kettle, Hoping to reach TSADD (TSA Disparaging Diamond) this year; PC plat,former MR Plat
Posts: 2,369
GAO's "Review of TSA Explosives Detection Requirements for Checked Baggage" is online

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report that explores TSA’s revised explosives detection requirements and deployed technology to identify and resolve explosives threats in checked baggage.

The report also examines whether the TSA’s approach to the current explosives detection system (EDS) acquisition meets best practices for schedules and cost estimates and includes plans for potential upgrades of deployed EDSs.

Here's the link: GAO-11-740, July 2011: United States Government Accountability Office - Report to Congressional Requesters - AVIATION SECURITY - TSA Has Enhanced Its Explosive Detection Requirements for Checked Baggage, but Additional Screening Actions Are Needed

Since US-government produced works are public domain, here is a cut-and-paste of page 1:
What GAO Found

TSA revised EDS explosives detection requirements in January 2010 to better address current threats and plans to implement these requirements in a phased approach. The first phase, which includes implementation of the previous 2005 requirements, is to take years to fully implement. However, deploying EDSs that meet 2010 requirements could prove difficult given that TSA did not begin deployment of EDSs meeting 2005 requirements until 4 years later in 2009. As of January 2011, some number of the EDSs in TSA’s fleet are detecting explosives at the level established in 2005. The remaining EDSs in the fleet are configured to meet the 1998 requirements because TSA either has not activated the included software or has not installed the needed hardware and software to allow these EDSs to meet the 2005 requirements. Developing a plan to deploy and operate EDSs to meet the most recent requirements could help ensure EDSs are operating most effectively and should improve checked-baggage screening. However, TSA has faced challenges in procuring the first 260 EDSs to meet 2010 requirements. For example, due to the danger associated with some explosives, TSA and DHS encountered challenges in developing simulants and collecting data on the explosives’ physical and chemical properties needed by vendors and agencies to develop detection software and test EDSs prior to the current acquisition. Also, TSA’s decision to pursue EDS procurement during data collection complicated both efforts and resulted in a delay of over 7 months for the current acquisition. Completing data collection for each phase of the 2010 requirements prior to pursuing EDS procurements that meet those requirements could help TSA avoid additional schedule delays.

TSA has established a schedule for the current EDS acquisition, but it does not fully comply with best practices, and TSA has not developed a plan to upgrade its EDS fleet. For example, the schedule is not reliable because it does not reflect all planned program activities and does not include a timeline to deploy EDSs or plans to procure EDSs to meet subsequent phases of the 2010 requirements. Developing a reliable schedule would help TSA better monitor and oversee the progress of the EDS acquisition. TSA officials stated that to meet the 2010 requirements, TSA will likely upgrade many of the current fleet of EDSs as well as the first 260 EDS machines to be purchased under the current acquisition. However, TSA has no plan in place outlining how it will approach these upgrades. Because TSA is implementing the 2010 requirements in a phased approach, the same EDS machines may need to be upgraded multiple times. TSA officials stated that they were confident the upgrades could be completed on deployed machines. However, without a plan, it will be difficult for TSA to provide reasonable assurance that the upgrades will be feasible or cost-effective.


So sad...
RatherBeOnATrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 10:41 am   #2
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 82
In my job, if someone told me "policies have changed, you need to start doing ____________," and I said, "Sure, I'll get right on it," and then waited four years to start, there would be um...issues. To put it mildly.
iowakatie1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 10:43 am   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 626
Yet they are moving as quick as they can in their process of assaulting, irradiating and looking at passengers nude. This agency has not a clue what they are doing.
jtodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 11:40 am   #4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 14,439
More importantly, it's all about getting contracts signed and equipment moving and pockets getting lined with dollars.

Who cares if the equipment really works? Who cares if it is cost-effective? Who cares if it provides a degree of safety or compromises the health and safety of both operators and pax.

This is all about feeding the pockets of the so-called security industry in this country.
chollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 9:27 pm   #5
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 649
TSA is corrupt from the top to the bottom.
__________________
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
bluenotesro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 9:35 pm   #6
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Already have a thread for this, I think started last week.
SATTSO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 10:40 pm   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 728
Who's surprised? Oh, no one?
barbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 11, 10:47 pm   #8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: Delta Air Lines, US Dividend Miles, Rapids Reward
Posts: 30,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbell View Post
Who's surprised? Oh, no one?
I don't see it either. Sorry!
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/scottweinbergpage?ref=hl Go to my new Facebook Page. Enjoy!
http://www.scottysair.com/
N830MH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 20, 11, 7:05 am   #9
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kryptonium Kettle, Hoping to reach TSADD (TSA Disparaging Diamond) this year; PC plat,former MR Plat
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by SATTSO View Post
Already have a thread for this, I think started last week.
I searched for it before posting and was not able to find any other threads on this particular GAO report.

if you can direct me to the thread where this report was already discussed, I'll ask the mods to merge the threads.
RatherBeOnATrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 20, 11, 7:22 am   #10
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by SATTSO View Post
Already have a thread for this, I think started last week.
The only thread you started last week was on "Risked Base Screening."
doober is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:00 pm.