Differences between CX and KA

Old Jun 26, 2016, 11:40 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: DUB / DOH
Posts: 682
Differences between CX and KA

Hi all, I am based in Shanghai and I have flown quite a bit in CX J. I usually select CX over KA, because CX use a large amount of their long haul A330's on the PVG route.

As CX/KA are sold interchangeably, at least to Shanghai, I assumed that the onboard product would be the same. Yesterday I took my first KA flight from HKG - PVG and I noticed quite a lot of difference.

- No champagne offered on KA as PDB
- Different drinks options, Taittinger champagne instead of Billecart
- No hot towels on KA, just horrible smelling wipes
- No introduction from flight deck, every CX flight I have taken has featured an intro from the captain.
- Different menu on KA, I quite liked the Asian Delights option that changes every day. I thought the food was in general better than my recent experiences on CX.
- IFE on KA did not tell you how long was left on the flight (this could be isolated)
- I thought the service on KA was much warmer and friendlier than my experiences on CX.


I just thought it was strange that there was these small differences between them. Surely they have the same suppliers in HKG and it would be more cost effective to have a uniform service. Also, CX/KA operate a lot of flights to Shanghai and it seems strange to differentiate.


One other question, why would anyone pay for F on KA, when they can get the same seat on J on CX?
jah718 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 12:08 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SYD/PEK
Programs: MPC CXGO, IHG RA
Posts: 104
I had flown to PEK in both CX and KA J, I think the reason one would book KA is probably because the better catering and more frequent service schedule.
CX only flies to PEK 3 times a day where KA has a flight nearly every hour.
And I have the same opinion as yours that the catering on KA is better than CX.

For the flight I taken on KA, it seems like the F cabin is usually more than half full (except morning flight), not sure whether they were upgraded or they purchased the F ticket, but I would say although you are getting the same long-haul CX J seat, the service is still first class service and the long haul J seats are very good for such regional sectors.
rays is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 2:58 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
Originally Posted by rays
I had flown to PEK in both CX and KA J, I think the reason one would book KA is probably because the better catering and more frequent service schedule.
CX only flies to PEK 3 times a day where KA has a flight nearly every hour.
And I have the same opinion as yours that the catering on KA is better than CX.

For the flight I taken on KA, it seems like the F cabin is usually more than half full (except morning flight), not sure whether they were upgraded or they purchased the F ticket, but I would say although you are getting the same long-haul CX J seat, the service is still first class service and the long haul J seats are very good for such regional sectors.
KA catering blows CX out of the water.
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 3:10 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
Originally Posted by jah718
Hi all, I am based in Shanghai and I have flown quite a bit in CX J. I usually select CX over KA, because CX use a large amount of their long haul A330's on the PVG route.

As CX/KA are sold interchangeably, at least to Shanghai, I assumed that the onboard product would be the same. Yesterday I took my first KA flight from HKG - PVG and I noticed quite a lot of difference.

- No champagne offered on KA as PDB
- Different drinks options, Taittinger champagne instead of Billecart
- No hot towels on KA, just horrible smelling wipes
- No introduction from flight deck, every CX flight I have taken has featured an intro from the captain.
- Different menu on KA, I quite liked the Asian Delights option that changes every day. I thought the food was in general better than my recent experiences on CX.
- IFE on KA did not tell you how long was left on the flight (this could be isolated)
- I thought the service on KA was much warmer and friendlier than my experiences on CX.


I just thought it was strange that there was these small differences between them. Surely they have the same suppliers in HKG and it would be more cost effective to have a uniform service. Also, CX/KA operate a lot of flights to Shanghai and it seems strange to differentiate.


One other question, why would anyone pay for F on KA, when they can get the same seat on J on CX?
They are different airlines.
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 3:14 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA EC
Posts: 524
KA food 5 stars
CX food 2 stars
neofung is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 3:24 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
Originally Posted by jah718
Hi all, I am based in Shanghai and I have flown quite a bit in CX J. I usually select CX over KA, because CX use a large amount of their long haul A330's on the PVG route.
I've yet to experience a CX "long haul" A330 on PVG-HKG. What flight typically uses these birds?
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 4:43 am
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: DUB / DOH
Posts: 682
Originally Posted by moondog
I've yet to experience a CX "long haul" A330 on PVG-HKG. What flight typically uses these birds?

I have had 7 flights between PVG - HKG in the past 6 months, all long haul J.

Flights were: CX365, CX367, CX360, CX369, CX364, CX369, CX360

I usually try to pick the long haul J, I get that there are flights with regional J too.
jah718 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 4:47 am
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: DUB / DOH
Posts: 682
Originally Posted by moondog
They are different airlines.
I get that they are different airlines, however, they are sold as the same airline, therefore service should be consistent, which it is not.
jah718 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 4:51 am
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
Originally Posted by jah718
I have had 7 flights between PVG - HKG in the past 6 months, all long haul J.

Flights were: CX365, CX367, CX360, CX369, CX364, CX369, CX360

I usually try to pick the long haul J, I get that there are flights with regional J too.
I stopped flying CX on that route about a year ago, due to equipment substitutions, and the fact that ka is categorically better.

Furthermore, i try my best to fly into Hongqiao northbound because immigration takes less than a minute there, and changing to a PVG flight is pretty easy. However, I still fly out of PVG due to the much more frequent schedule.
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 8:02 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: pleb
Posts: 563
Originally Posted by jah718
I get that they are different airlines, however, they are sold as the same airline, therefore service should be consistent, which it is not.
Not really. They're sold as the "same" airline since KA is a subsidiary of CX (think codeshare), especially now with the re-branding. But they are technically two different airlines so services will still be different between the two.
nightkhan is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 8:14 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: country Western Australia
Programs: QF SG(LTS) - AA LTG(1MM)
Posts: 2,770
jah718
One other question, why would anyone pay for F on KA, when they can get the same seat on J on CX?
There are many partner FF programs where first class fares credit far better. And I suspect exiting the airplane at the destination is faster.

Happy wandering

Fred
wandering_fred is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2016, 8:55 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
Originally Posted by jah718
I get that they are different airlines, however, they are sold as the same airline, therefore service should be consistent, which it is not.
Different crews
Different caterers
Different airplanes
...shall I continue?
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2016, 3:15 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,053
A bit OT, but I can see how someone can be led to believe that they are "sold as the same airline".

How could an unsuspecting traveler possibly guess that CX360 is a CX operated flight, whereas CX6869 will be on a KA plane?



They are not making it easier by sending out pre-flight reminders with a big fat Dragonair logo on it, for routes that are not even served by KA.



Until I figured out the 3/4 number code system on these routes, I had to hike hiking from one end of the check-in aisles to the other more than once (why do they need to be so far apart, anyway?!)
gpia is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2016, 3:32 am
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
The 3/4 digit numbering scheme should be obvious to even casual readers of FT.
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2016, 3:58 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted by moondog
The 3/4 digit numbering scheme should be obvious to even casual readers of FT.
While I would go as far as to challenge that assessment, I was not one of those in 2011 anyhow. I was also a lot slimmer back then. Probably from all those hikes between A and J. FT has made me fat.
gpia is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.