Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

Cathay waiting for 747-8I service entry before jumbo decision

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cathay waiting for 747-8I service entry before jumbo decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2011, 4:49 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Programs: Asia Miles, Marco Polo, Virgin Flying Club, Etihad Guest & Silver BA Executive Club
Posts: 284
Cathay waiting for 747-8I service entry before jumbo decision

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...cision-364252/

Cathay Pacific will make a decision on an order for new jumbo aircraft only after evaluating the performance of Boeing's 747-8 Intercontinental, which is due to enter into service in 2012.

The company has in the past said it would make a "substantial order" of 10-15 aircraft if it goes ahead. These, and the airline's existing orders for Boeing 777-300ERs and Airbus A350s, would replace the 21 Boeing 747-400, 11 Airbus A340-300 and some older Airbus A330s in its fleet.

Cathay, however, will not follow the likes of Lufthansa and Korean Air Lines and order both types of aircraft as that would not "make sense" for the airline.

"We would like only one type of aircraft in our fleet as that would be more economical. I don't see how having both would work for us," said Slosar. "By next year, we will get details on the strengths and weaknesses of both aircraft and how they will fit into our route network, and be in a better position to make that decision."
g.yau is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2011, 11:23 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Marco Polo
Posts: 546
I have a good feeling that sometime next year, CX will order the 747-8I, it would have fleet commonality with the 748F version, and 744 flight crews can transition easily, also the cargo volume is larger than A380, but less than 77W.
KrazyTrain18 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2011, 1:49 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by KrazyTrain18
I have a good feeling that sometime next year, CX will order the 747-8I, it would have fleet commonality with the 748F version, and 744 flight crews can transition easily, also the cargo volume is larger than A380, but less than 77W.
Not to mention A380 seems to have non-stop problems. The new one China Southern got has already been grounded after a few months flying, and Airbus sent them a substitute A380 while they take care of the problem. Not good...
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2011, 4:56 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Marco Polo
Posts: 546
Yeah, not even a month and a half and grounded, QF is having problems too (I know more engine stuff) but still it's on an A380.
KrazyTrain18 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 8:47 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,321
Originally Posted by KrazyTrain18
Yeah, not even a month and a half and grounded, QF is having problems too (I know more engine stuff) but still it's on an A380.
VH-OQA is still in SIN but, they are undergo to repaired the engines. How much longer when Nancy Bird will be back on the air again.
N830MH is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 8:50 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: skudai, Johor
Posts: 417
http://www.facebook.com/#!/media/set...9870307&type=1

The CX facebook link shows off thier new 747-8
inlandrev is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 9:25 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 904
Part of their decision is ultimately also based on the performance of this cargo variant.

Wonder what was the long wait at Paine Field before delivery though. I think those yet-to-be-delivered B747-8Fs were sitting there since the start of the year, maybe even through to 2010.
GE90-115B is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2011, 5:07 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tokyo, Singapore, Seoul
Programs: CX DM, OZ Diamond+, JAL JMB Nobody
Posts: 78
A good friend of mine is an SQ pilot based in SG now flying the 380 after years of doing long haul 777. He tells me the 380 malfunctions "all the time" and has even heard of flap malfunctions. That said, he does like the plane and thinks Airbus will work out the kinks eventually. Personally, I avoid the 380 at all costs though I'm sure the 748 will suffer through some initial teething pains as well.
heavyascent is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2011, 6:08 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 208
Who will be the first customer fly 748I?
untamed is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2011, 8:41 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
Originally Posted by untamed
Who will be the first customer fly 748I?
....you should be able to roughly figure this information out from the Wikipedia page for the 747-8. I believe the first is going to a ME customer for a VIP order. And then, since there are only three airlines who have ordered them (I think Air China has ordered the pax variant as well, but it seems omitted from the Wikipedia list), one of those three (I think Lufthansa) will be the first to get commercial service going
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2011, 6:16 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by QRC3288
....you should be able to roughly figure this information out from the Wikipedia page for the 747-8. I believe the first is going to a ME customer for a VIP order. And then, since there are only three airlines who have ordered them (I think Air China has ordered the pax variant as well, but it seems omitted from the Wikipedia list), one of those three (I think Lufthansa) will be the first to get commercial service going
Thanks. Previous I though 748 is for freight only.
untamed is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2011, 8:37 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by heavyascent
A good friend of mine is an SQ pilot based in SG now flying the 380 after years of doing long haul 777. He tells me the 380 malfunctions "all the time" and has even heard of flap malfunctions. That said, he does like the plane and thinks Airbus will work out the kinks eventually. Personally, I avoid the 380 at all costs though I'm sure the 748 will suffer through some initial teething pains as well.
There is teething and there is design flaw. I mean 787 is going through some teething issues too, but come one, engine blow outs, engine shut downs, and now flap malfunctions? These are not "teething" but critical flaws that can jeopardize the lives of everyone on board. Not good....
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2011, 11:33 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 91
747-8I Seat Count?

How many seats do you think a CX 748i could fit in a 4 class config? Initial guesses put this to around 355 seats (F9/J54/Y+40/Y252) with standard configuration, i.e. current F, Cirrus J, 42" Y+, 32" Y.

This, along with other factors (economics, etc.), will decide whether CX buys the 748i. Hopefully, CX will buy this wonderful looking bird (but that's not the most important thing for the beancounters...)

FYI, the current CX 74A (Olympus 744) seats 379 (F9/J46/Y324).
comcats is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2011, 10:25 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by comcats
How many seats do you think a CX 748i could fit in a 4 class config? Initial guesses put this to around 355 seats (F9/J54/Y+40/Y252) with standard configuration, i.e. current F, Cirrus J, 42" Y+, 32" Y.

This, along with other factors (economics, etc.), will decide whether CX buys the 748i. Hopefully, CX will buy this wonderful looking bird (but that's not the most important thing for the beancounters...)

FYI, the current CX 74A (Olympus 744) seats 379 (F9/J46/Y324).
Y+ will be more for J, remember, Y+ more often than not reduce would-be J travelers rather than lure Y travelers paying double price to sit in Y+.

More likely: F4, J40, Y+70, Y230:344
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2011, 4:01 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 91
Adjusted Seat Numbers

Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
Y+ will be more for J, remember, Y+ more often than not reduce would-be J travelers rather than lure Y travelers paying double price to sit in Y+.

More likely: F4, J40, Y+70, Y230:344
Oh. I always thought that it would be a Y+ and a Y+ only, not a J- (that is, according to this page).

Anyways, if it is indeed a J- called "Premium Economy", then the seat numbers (using a similar ratio to yours) would be F9, J40, Y+64, Y252=365

Not too much different to 77W in seat numbers. Remember that you need to fill up a 748i or a A388 to justify buying a VLA. A 4 class 77W would seat about 274 (F6, J53, Y+40, Y175; the 3 class 77G has even lower Y+ to Y ratio).
comcats is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.