Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Rumor: MPC will go way of PPS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2015, 8:28 am
  #436  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by sxc
To an extent the really top fliers are not going to alter their flying pattern. And CX is going to shut out people to appease those top fliers. Those people who get shut out may decide that being loyal to CX is no longer necessary because the bar is too high.

So CX retains the customers that wouldn't move anyway, and the customers with discretionary spend (personal fliers, those who can choose their carrier and not on commercial contract) may decide that loyalty isn't worth it, and choose the lowest fare available.

Is this a net loss for CX in the end?
This is exactly what will happen. True F/J fliers don't worry about benefits and program perks the way frequent Y fliers do. Their flying pattern won't change much just because CX kicked out Y-DM from their lounges or make priority boarding more exclusive.

Frequent Y fliers on the other hand are the ones that bean counts benefits, compares programs, and aim for highest tier possible with one airline. If I had to choose between AA EXP or CX GO (the highest tier the enhanced MPO will allowed me to make, or some watered down future DM tier that is pretty much the current CX GO), it's a no-brainer.

So in essence, CX forced someone like me to give my $35,000 to $40,000 annual revenue to AA, and of course once I saved up all the AA points guess which airline I'll spend it on, CX.....

As for posters that argues lounge access is a cost, it's a OW benefit, as OWE I will have access to F lounge, so ironically the new enhanced CX DM might bar DMs from going to a lounge that OWE can easily enter. And please don't say CX is making money at $50 a pop, that's the best guess in this group, that number seems high, in reality it's probably around $20 USD a pop.
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 10:33 am
  #437  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
TPG recommends going for AAdvantage for Y travellers http://thepointsguy.com/2015/01/brit...+Points+Guy%29
percysmith is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 11:25 am
  #438  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
This is exactly what will happen. True F/J fliers don't worry about benefits and program perks the way frequent Y fliers do. Their flying pattern won't change much just because CX kicked out Y-DM from their lounges or make priority boarding more exclusive.
I argued a bit earler that this may bind some members with discretionary spend to CX more.

But to achieve the new requirements these people will have to be J/F fliers.

If they're already in J/F (i.e. qualifying for the next renewal), they don't see a lot more for being MPO.

They have to be back in Y for some reason (e.g. corporate travel in J, business travel in Y or redemption) in order to get any bang for their discretionary buck.

---

Why would CX do this I wonder. They won't bother with the trial balloons like the SCMP pieces unless they think it's a win for them at least initially (te trial balloons get us talking and they can fine-tune their models)

Perhaps there really are some split J/Y fliers out there. Or CX is merely trying to cut cost (they can charge AA if Cathay Boy and QRC3288 went over to AA EXP, for instance). Perhaps a bit of both.
percysmith is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 12:58 pm
  #439  
Ambassador: Japan Airlines
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: JAL Mileage Bank, JMB Diamond, oneworld Emerald, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 16,394
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
This is exactly what will happen. True F/J fliers don't worry about benefits and program perks the way frequent Y fliers do. Their flying pattern won't change much just because CX kicked out Y-DM from their lounges or make priority boarding more exclusive.

Frequent Y fliers on the other hand are the ones that bean counts benefits, compares programs, and aim for highest tier possible with one airline. If I had to choose between AA EXP or CX GO (the highest tier the enhanced MPO will allowed me to make, or some watered down future DM tier that is pretty much the current CX GO), it's a no-brainer.

So in essence, CX forced someone like me to give my $35,000 to $40,000 annual revenue to AA, and of course once I saved up all the AA points guess which airline I'll spend it on, CX.....

As for posters that argues lounge access is a cost, it's a OW benefit, as OWE I will have access to F lounge, so ironically the new enhanced CX DM might bar DMs from going to a lounge that OWE can easily enter. And please don't say CX is making money at $50 a pop, that's the best guess in this group, that number seems high, in reality it's probably around $20 USD a pop.
Sure hard-core Y FTers will compare programs and shop around. But is this true for regular Y frequent flyers?

Please...you are not going to give your revenue to AA. You have already admitted that.
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
Originally Posted by percysmith
Well would you really fly more AA? Or simply credit CX flights to AA.

And if they think they are giving too many premium seats to partners they can easily do something about that.
Well, my company is flying me Y+ now (but not J) so I'll probably still stick with CX because Y+ is Y+.... darn you CX, you got me, darn you!
JALPak is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 4:03 pm
  #440  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: JGC Sapphire
Posts: 283
Originally Posted by JALPak
Sure hard-core Y FTers will compare programs and shop around. But is this true for regular Y frequent flyers?

Please...you are not going to give your revenue to AA. You have already admitted that.
If he switch he will need to change his ID to American boy
nshizuka25 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 5:31 pm
  #441  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: country Western Australia
Programs: QF SG(LTS) - AA LTG(1MM)
Posts: 2,771
Originally Posted by percysmith
Perhaps there really are some split J/Y fliers out there. Or CX is merely trying to cut cost (they can charge AA if Cathay Boy and QRC3288 went over to AA EXP, for instance). Perhaps a bit of both.
Depends I guess on how you define "split". In HKG, there are the exHKG fliers and the exTPE fliers. Or in my case exCMB fliers. Which of those category of J fliers does (or will) CX value if the "new MPC" comes into being?

And where will the regular PEY fliers find themselves?

Happy wandering

Fred
wandering_fred is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 7:24 pm
  #442  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SIN, PIE
Programs: AA-EXP, SQ-PPS, Marriott PP
Posts: 210
Originally Posted by percysmith

Perhaps there really are some split J/Y fliers out there.
I'm one of them and it's on my own dime. J/PE on CX, J/Y on AA. I started out pure Y but each year my ratio of paid J increases to the point it's was about 50/50 last year. Mostly J so far this year.
iadp is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 12:22 am
  #443  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,555
Originally Posted by percysmith
Perhaps there really are some split J/Y fliers out there. Or CX is merely trying to cut cost (they can charge AA if Cathay Boy and QRC3288 went over to AA EXP, for instance). Perhaps a bit of both.
Of course, there are many split J/Y flyers. Many companies pay for J travel for 10+ hrs flights to Europe or America but for Y travel regional.

And cost is becoming increasingly important when pax are increasingly price sensitive. In my experience there is a huge number of DMs in the wing F lounge gorging themselves on the food before their weekly regional flight in cheap Y. It is a business decision for CX to be more price competitive while reducing the lounge cost of all these SL/GO/DM. BA just did the same for the same price-competitiveness motivation (they also greatly reduced the ear/burn rate for most Y flyers, so much more expensive awards, meaning less cost for BA). And CX gets paid for other OW elites using their lounge, so that is not an issue.
brunos is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 4:27 pm
  #444  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by percysmith
TPG recommends going for AAdvantage for Y travellers http://thepointsguy.com/2015/01/brit...+Points+Guy%29
Between CX service, hardware, and current DM benefits I still prefer MPO even thought I know AA will just shower me with freebie upgrades, bonus points, etc.

But of course MPO benefits reduction, I need to reevaluate.
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 4:52 pm
  #445  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
Between CX service, hardware, and current DM benefits I still prefer MPO even thought I know AA will just shower me with freebie upgrades, bonus points, etc.

But of course MPO benefits reduction, I need to reevaluate.
Understandable... For economy, you can only get AA miles for CX class H or above. As you are flying PEY these days, you can get 110% AA miles anyway.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 9:01 pm
  #446  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by cxfan1960
Understandable... For economy, you can only get AA miles for CX class H or above. As you are flying PEY these days, you can get 110% AA miles anyway.
Exactly since I don't fly Y anymore, and then I can make AA EXP easy and get more bonus miles, freebie upgrades, etc.

so in essence, with this "enhancement" I'm still going to "clug" the priority line as OWE, use the F lounges, and get more miles to redeem CX F/J cabins more easily and not even paying CX YQ/YR?

Is CX really better off with their top tier Y fliers all going this route?
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 9:07 pm
  #447  
Ambassador: Japan Airlines
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: JAL Mileage Bank, JMB Diamond, oneworld Emerald, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 16,394
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
Exactly since I don't fly Y anymore, and then I can make AA EXP easy and get more bonus miles, freebie upgrades, etc.

so in essence, with this "enhancement" I'm still going to "clug" the priority line as OWE, use the F lounges, and get more miles to redeem CX F/J cabins more easily and not even paying CX YQ/YR?

Is CX really better off with their top tier Y fliers all going this route?
Absolutely. They get paid even more every time you fly with them and use their lounges. Also don't have to pay others when you enter other lounges. No liability for the miles from your flight once it paid AA to credit your flights. CX got paid when you redeem miles and it could care less whether you pay YQ or not on that redemption as AA pays a pre-negotiated rate.
JALPak is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 9:11 pm
  #448  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: KUL/BOS
Programs: AZ FA+, BA & UA Gold
Posts: 342
Originally Posted by JALPak
Absolutely. They get paid even more every time you fly with them and use their lounges. Also don't have to pay others when you enter other lounges. No liability for the miles from your flight once it paid AA to credit your flights. CX got paid when you redeem miles and it could care less whether you pay YQ or not on that redemption as AA pays a pre-negotiated rate.
Well then, so much for actually improving the experience for people front of the cabin...
Enhancements is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2015, 9:19 pm
  #449  
Ambassador: Japan Airlines
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: JAL Mileage Bank, JMB Diamond, oneworld Emerald, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 16,394
Originally Posted by Enhancements
Well then, so much for actually improving the experience for people front of the cabin...
Not if CX is creating a Titanium lounge and implementing extra benefits for its F pax and top tier members which those people won't have access to.
JALPak is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2015, 1:36 am
  #450  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
Jalpak: is it likely? Where's this new Titanium/F lounge going to be implemented (in HKG)?
percysmith is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.