What's going on with CX food in J?
#91
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: EWR
Programs: CX Green | UA Silver | Marriott Lifetime Platinum | Hyatt Globalist | Hilton Gold | AA EXP
Posts: 813
Can CX management please seriously take a flight with SQ? And observe and experience what F&B really is all about as a premier airline! I am amazed they haven't yet realised how far behind they are in the game.
PS I like the garlic bread...it is the highlight of J meal! (Sad but true)
PS I like the garlic bread...it is the highlight of J meal! (Sad but true)
It would be nice if CX would just take all the best bits of different airlines but I think we all know that's not possible. I do hope CX improves its onboard F&B experience (which would be consistent with the overall theme of better rewarding J passengers) but I wonder what's the cost to non-J passengers ...
Last edited by Rivarix; Jul 7, 2015 at 1:59 pm
#92
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: EWR
Programs: CX Green | UA Silver | Marriott Lifetime Platinum | Hyatt Globalist | Hilton Gold | AA EXP
Posts: 813
When did you receive this response from CX? I don't know about you but I would consider responding by saying thank you for your response. I appreciate that CX is looking into this. May i suggest CX hires Cho Hyun-ah to head the in-flight service dept?
#93
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco
Programs: QF Platinum, Former CX Diamond, TG Gold, HH Diamond, IHG Spire Ambassador, Amex Platinum
Posts: 173
I flew SQ long haul and regional J for the first time in a decade last week and could not believe the difference in food quality compared to CX long haul and regional J. While the SQ crew continue to be a little too robotic for my liking and the SQ J seat leaves plenty to be desired, the outstanding part of the experience was the superior food offering. I knew CX J food was average but now that I have a valid point of comparison, I realize that the slop in a casserole that CX serve is completely substandard for a leading airline.
I should point out that the only reason I flew SQ on this trip was because there is simply no incentive to continue flying CX (or oneworld) once I requalify for DM. But now I’ve had a taste (pun intended) of what’s out there, there’s even less incentive to continue flying with CX after requalification.
I should point out that the only reason I flew SQ on this trip was because there is simply no incentive to continue flying CX (or oneworld) once I requalify for DM. But now I’ve had a taste (pun intended) of what’s out there, there’s even less incentive to continue flying with CX after requalification.
#94
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: MNL
Programs: CX MPO DM, Le Club Accor Platinum, World of Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,284
Anyway when the SP asked me if I wanted dessert, I said I have my own and showed her the small plastic container. She took it and said that she will put it in a plate for me, I just thought it was a nice gesture. Plus when it was served the coconut cream was placed in a separate dipping dish.
So I guess it really depends on the crew...
#95
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
Oh dear... But seriously though...on a flight from BKK to HKG on F (again sorry a little off topic), I brought mango and sticky rice from the duty free in BKK with the intention of having it for dessert on the flight. (is that allowed??)
Anyway when the SP asked me if I wanted dessert, I said I have my own and showed her the small plastic container. She took it and said that she will put it in a plate for me, I just thought it was a nice gesture. Plus when it was served the coconut cream was placed in a separate dipping dish.
So I guess it really depends on the crew...
Anyway when the SP asked me if I wanted dessert, I said I have my own and showed her the small plastic container. She took it and said that she will put it in a plate for me, I just thought it was a nice gesture. Plus when it was served the coconut cream was placed in a separate dipping dish.
So I guess it really depends on the crew...
My assumption above is that very, very few HK-based travelers buy those F tickets with cash. More than a few HKG-based folks come to mind who purchase cash F fares to New York, San Francisco and London, and yet happily fly Y and J class regionally. The argument for a HK-based traveler - no matter how wealthy - to insist on regional F is silly, given the horrible lack of frequencies (compared to Y and J offerings) and the routine equipment swaps even when "F" is sold. And flying private is truly a gouge in the eye to a place like TPE or BKK, because the # of frequencies ex-HKG (and the convenience of HKG) are so great that you really aren't getting that much more flexibility by going private, and are paying a massive premium to do so.
On "protected" F flights - aka, every long-haul F and the Japan F flights, CX catering is good enough IMO. I have limited experience with SQ F (but growing!!), but on my first pass I actually preferred CX's Chinese offerings. I have another one coming up and will try this "book the cook" thing.
Back to the J section, what it sounds to me like is I need to fly SQ J regionally more. I certainly respect what some of the posters have said based on their history on here, and I think if the situation calls for regional J - especially on my SIN flights, which are at least 4-6x annually - I should hit up SQ. Plus you can guarantee the hard product you're getting with 3x daily long-haul metal (2x 77W and 1x daily A380 at regular schedule), as well as a few other regional metal mixed in (772 and A333). When I fly SQ regionally ex HKG it seems like the equipment is very predictable.
#96
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: MNL
Programs: CX MPO DM, Le Club Accor Platinum, World of Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,284
Manila has been consistent with at least 1 F (CX900/901 or CX906/907) flight a day, sometimes they add another one in the afternoon (CX903/902 or CX935/934). Mostly I guess are for passengers traveling from Europe or NA on F, its also nice for MPC members because theres a huge chance that the flight is oversold hence you get free opups to F. Its not really much IMO, food is pretty much the same with J, but at least you get better service (technically).
In the end I think the quality and taste of the food aside (I've had good F on a MNL-HKG once with a lobster appetizer), it really boils down to the crew if they will go the extra mile, on the BKK sector it was 6/6, MNL was 3/6, so they can't claim that they are busy.
In the end I think the quality and taste of the food aside (I've had good F on a MNL-HKG once with a lobster appetizer), it really boils down to the crew if they will go the extra mile, on the BKK sector it was 6/6, MNL was 3/6, so they can't claim that they are busy.
to be fair mate, those MNL, TPE, BKK etc. regional flights are not really what CX intends for their "F" offering (also referring to your poor catering service on your MNL F flight). It's a scam IMO CX continues to "offer" F on those segments, I think mainly their intention is to grab a little extra incremental revenue from AA and BA partners booking award tickets through to final destinations. Those AA guys obviously care most about the long-haul sector, so even while they might whinge on FT about losing F to BKK or MNL, they'll still redeem their next annual holiday on CX F regardless what CX did to this year's MNL sector, because F on the New York - HKG sector is what really matters. CX clearly has no intention of protecting F on those regional flights - meaning they'll swap away metal on those flights whenever it suits them. It's basically CX scamming back the AA/BA/etc partner customers who are going to keep burning their partner awards on CX regardless if CX swaps their 77W to TPE for A333. Their (successful, if not highly annoying) logic has been, "you won't really care that much in the grand scheme of things."
My assumption above is that very, very few HK-based travelers buy those F tickets with cash. More than a few HKG-based folks come to mind who purchase cash F fares to New York, San Francisco and London, and yet happily fly Y and J class regionally. The argument for a HK-based traveler - no matter how wealthy - to insist on regional F is silly, given the horrible lack of frequencies (compared to Y and J offerings) and the routine equipment swaps even when "F" is sold. And flying private is truly a gouge in the eye to a place like TPE or BKK, because the # of frequencies ex-HKG (and the convenience of HKG) are so great that you really aren't getting that much more flexibility by going private, and are paying a massive premium to do so.
On "protected" F flights - aka, every long-haul F and the Japan F flights, CX catering is good enough IMO. I have limited experience with SQ F (but growing!!), but on my first pass I actually preferred CX's Chinese offerings. I have another one coming up and will try this "book the cook" thing.
Back to the J section, what it sounds to me like is I need to fly SQ J regionally more. I certainly respect what some of the posters have said based on their history on here, and I think if the situation calls for regional J - especially on my SIN flights, which are at least 4-6x annually - I should hit up SQ. Plus you can guarantee the hard product you're getting with 3x daily long-haul metal (2x 77W and 1x daily A380 at regular schedule), as well as a few other regional metal mixed in (772 and A333). When I fly SQ regionally ex HKG it seems like the equipment is very predictable.
My assumption above is that very, very few HK-based travelers buy those F tickets with cash. More than a few HKG-based folks come to mind who purchase cash F fares to New York, San Francisco and London, and yet happily fly Y and J class regionally. The argument for a HK-based traveler - no matter how wealthy - to insist on regional F is silly, given the horrible lack of frequencies (compared to Y and J offerings) and the routine equipment swaps even when "F" is sold. And flying private is truly a gouge in the eye to a place like TPE or BKK, because the # of frequencies ex-HKG (and the convenience of HKG) are so great that you really aren't getting that much more flexibility by going private, and are paying a massive premium to do so.
On "protected" F flights - aka, every long-haul F and the Japan F flights, CX catering is good enough IMO. I have limited experience with SQ F (but growing!!), but on my first pass I actually preferred CX's Chinese offerings. I have another one coming up and will try this "book the cook" thing.
Back to the J section, what it sounds to me like is I need to fly SQ J regionally more. I certainly respect what some of the posters have said based on their history on here, and I think if the situation calls for regional J - especially on my SIN flights, which are at least 4-6x annually - I should hit up SQ. Plus you can guarantee the hard product you're getting with 3x daily long-haul metal (2x 77W and 1x daily A380 at regular schedule), as well as a few other regional metal mixed in (772 and A333). When I fly SQ regionally ex HKG it seems like the equipment is very predictable.
#97
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: MNL
Programs: CX MPO DM, Le Club Accor Platinum, World of Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,284
Back to the J section, what it sounds to me like is I need to fly SQ J regionally more. I certainly respect what some of the posters have said based on their history on here, and I think if the situation calls for regional J - especially on my SIN flights, which are at least 4-6x annually - I should hit up SQ. Plus you can guarantee the hard product you're getting with 3x daily long-haul metal (2x 77W and 1x daily A380 at regular schedule), as well as a few other regional metal mixed in (772 and A333). When I fly SQ regionally ex HKG it seems like the equipment is very predictable.
#98
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 73
Over the years I think CX has been fairly consistent in F&B in J and F. Personally they are scarily consistent it is terribly tedious. Good thing is you know what to expect but rather unfortunately it has never really been top notch. I do hope they are doing something about it.
#99
Ambassador: Japan Airlines
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: JAL Mileage Bank, JMB Diamond, oneworld Emerald, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 16,394
#100
Formerly known as jsfrSuperElite
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hong Kong, Montreal
Programs: Air Canada SE100K-1MM, Hilton Honors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 590
[QUOTE=Justinroundtheworld;25080718]
No.
For those of us who have top tier status with CX and with another carrier in Star Alliance for instance, they do listen, as we have a choice and I always point this out.
For those of us who have top tier status with CX and with another carrier in Star Alliance for instance, they do listen, as we have a choice and I always point this out.
#102
Suspended
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11A501 Safari/9537.53)
My first cx j ME mid-haul. Dxb-hkg. Meal1: food was... Soso. At least it was hot. Chicken in black bean scallion and ginger sauce or some sort of that. The chicken was diced w a course outterskin. Dry meat. Amazing (then i dozed off)
Breakfast was a tray full of freezing cold food: bun, sweet pastry, oatmeal and fruits. Couldnt take any of that.
My first cx j ME mid-haul. Dxb-hkg. Meal1: food was... Soso. At least it was hot. Chicken in black bean scallion and ginger sauce or some sort of that. The chicken was diced w a course outterskin. Dry meat. Amazing (then i dozed off)
Breakfast was a tray full of freezing cold food: bun, sweet pastry, oatmeal and fruits. Couldnt take any of that.
#103
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: EWR
Programs: CX Green | UA Silver | Marriott Lifetime Platinum | Hyatt Globalist | Hilton Gold | AA EXP
Posts: 813
#104
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: MNL
Programs: CX MPO DM, Le Club Accor Platinum, World of Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,284
There's been some improvement last June for Breakfast exMNL when they served Beef Tapa and Garlic Rice....they changed back to dimsum for July...I know CX is a Hong Kong Based airline but they should stop asking MNL to try making dim sum because it just doesn't taste good. Most of the dimsum exMNL look like those sold from food carts at a local mall. When they do a Filipino breakfast it's normally tasty...and of course works well with the fresh Mango Juice.
#105
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,783
There's been some improvement last June for Breakfast exMNL when they served Beef Tapa and Garlic Rice....they changed back to dimsum for July...I know CX is a Hong Kong Based airline but they should stop asking MNL to try making dim sum because it just doesn't taste good. Most of the dimsum exMNL look like those sold from food carts at a local mall. When they do a Filipino breakfast it's normally tasty...and of course works well with the fresh Mango Juice.
For Philippine flights - Something like a Beef Tapa or Daing (local fish) for breakfast, Adobo (chicken in vinegar and soy sauce) or something like Mechado (beef stew) for lunch or dinner
For KUL flights - Beef Rendang or some other native dish for lunch or dinner
And so forth.
And for the Western breakfast option - It's the same eggs over and over again. Whether its sausage or bacon on the side, it's the same thing and its getting pretty bad. Some pancakes, french toast or something different from the usual eggs would be nice