Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Americas > Canada
Reload this Page >

Why do USA-Eastern Canada flights never last?

Why do USA-Eastern Canada flights never last?

Old Apr 20, 2015, 9:41 pm
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Why do USA-Eastern Canada flights never last?

I seem to have very bad luck booking flights to Eastern Canada: about half the time I book a ticket -- usually for a leisure trip several months in advance -- my flight gets cancelled before I get to fly. In the past half-dozen years, I've compiled an "impressive" track record of cancelled flights:

JFK-YHZ
EWR-YQM
JFK-YYQ
ACY-YYZ
PHL-YQB (was able to rebook: service reduced to one frequency)

So what is it that makes airlines want to try these flights -- and then give up? Why are new routes to Canada from the USA so unsuccessful?

This summer, I've booked UA's EWR flight to St. John's Newfoundland. I check it every month or so to see if it's still operating. So far, so good, but something tells me (past experience?) that flying A320s to St. John's is a stone-cold loser. The seat map currently shows my flights booked to about 10% capacity. Fingers crossed.
iahphx is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2015, 10:13 pm
  #2  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,426
Wow, a 320

My guess is it won't be cancelled, but downgauged @:-)

Cross border flights tend to be expensive due to taxes and perhaps other things which may be why they never get off the ground.

You only check once a month

With UA, I find the need to check is more like daily, probably more often. If they change to RJ like I suspect, it will involve a flight number change and possibly loss of seat assignment.
EmailKid is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2015, 10:39 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Originally Posted by EmailKid
Wow, a 320

My guess is it won't be cancelled, but downgauged @:-)

Cross border flights tend to be expensive due to taxes and perhaps other things which may be why they never get off the ground.

You only check once a month

With UA, I find the need to check is more like daily, probably more often. If they change to RJ like I suspect, it will involve a flight number change and possibly loss of seat assignment.
Hey, at least it's a UA award ticket I booked on UA. I figure they'll at least call me if they cancel it. I'm more careful when, for example, I book an award ticket on a partner airline. Nobody tells you anything.

I know UA changes its schedule with remarkable frequency, and little tweaks have occurred every month on these flights. But I figure if they're going to pull the plug for summer on this flight, they'd do it by now.

That said, if anyone else from the East Coast wants to get to Newfoundland easily, this is probably your summer: the odds that this flight makes it to 2016 seem slim to me.
iahphx is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 9:46 am
  #4  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,426
Originally Posted by iahphx
Hey, at least it's a UA award ticket I booked on UA. I figure they'll at least call me if they cancel it. I'm more careful when, for example, I book an award ticket on a partner airline. Nobody tells you anything.

I know UA changes its schedule with remarkable frequency, and little tweaks have occurred every month on these flights.
I would not count on a notification.

I've had them eliminate service on one of my connecting flights and they automatically rebooked me on a flight that would land AFTER my connection took off.

I had a reward flight on cancelled DAL-DEN (service entirely eliminated) and without notice they changed my flights to DFW-DEN at an ugodly early hour
EmailKid is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 10:57 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NYC
Programs: AA GLD, AC
Posts: 4,212
So you basically mean the Northeast US and eastern Canada.

Flights between the NE and YYZ/YUL definitely last. Porter seems to be doing OK with YTZ as well.

Other than that, there aren't really any big cities in eastern Canada. The cities (YHZ, YQB, YYT) don't have huge business ties to the US, and they don't attract large numbers of US tourists, particularly outside summer. Plus cross-border flights to the smaller cities tend to be rather expensive - combination of high Canadian taxes plus the prices they need to charge in order to make up for the fact that few people are flying. For a family, it can be much cheaper to drive from the NYC area or New England to YQB/YHZ, etc.

Also, AC is going to dominate the market in those cities because it's a Canadian carrier and has the Aeroplan reward program - so that's going to draw much of the Canadian traffic.

And I think your mention of ACY-YYZ is a red herring. The problem isn't that it's a flight to eastern Canada; the problem is that it's a flight to/from a one-horse casino town that's imploding.
M60_to_LGA is online now  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 7:55 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Originally Posted by M60_to_LGA
So you basically mean the Northeast US and eastern Canada.

Flights between the NE and YYZ/YUL definitely last. Porter seems to be doing OK with YTZ as well.

Other than that, there aren't really any big cities in eastern Canada. The cities (YHZ, YQB, YYT) don't have huge business ties to the US, and they don't attract large numbers of US tourists, particularly outside summer. Plus cross-border flights to the smaller cities tend to be rather expensive - combination of high Canadian taxes plus the prices they need to charge in order to make up for the fact that few people are flying. For a family, it can be much cheaper to drive from the NYC area or New England to YQB/YHZ, etc.

Also, AC is going to dominate the market in those cities because it's a Canadian carrier and has the Aeroplan reward program - so that's going to draw much of the Canadian traffic.

And I think your mention of ACY-YYZ is a red herring. The problem isn't that it's a flight to eastern Canada; the problem is that it's a flight to/from a one-horse casino town that's imploding.
Right, it's Northeast USA to Eastern Canada flights. And you're right: there's obviously demand to YUL and YYZ and these flights do fine. It's all the other flights that fail. And I think the reasons you give are likely the cause. These routes are often on small aircraft, so you have to generate significant RASM. Yet, combined with high taxes, that makes the seats expensive. And most Americans are completely indifferent to Canada, especially Eastern Canada, and really wouldn't think of touring anything other than Niagara Falls. And there's apparently not enough Canadian tourists heading south -- which won't be getting better with the fall in the value of the Loonie.

BTW, I'm a bit surprised the Canadians don't ask the USA to change the air taxes. They're kind of stupid. When you drive across the border, it's free. When you fly, you get soaked. It's stupid, and obviously discourages cross-border flying. Does anyone know the percentage of BTV's leisure pax who are Canadian?
iahphx is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 4:46 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,682
Half of the cars parked at the long term lot at BUF seems to have Ontario plates on them.
tentseller is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 8:49 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NYC
Programs: AA GLD, AC
Posts: 4,212
Originally Posted by iahphx
BTW, I'm a bit surprised the Canadians don't ask the USA to change the air taxes. They're kind of stupid. When you drive across the border, it's free. When you fly, you get soaked. It's stupid, and obviously discourages cross-border flying. Does anyone know the percentage of BTV's leisure pax who are Canadian?
Actually, most of the taxes on cross-border flights are imposed by the Canadians. They have very high taxes even on domestic flights. So there's not much the US can really do (not that it should - what's the compelling US national interest in having more Americans fly to Canada?):

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/why-it-costs-so...nada-1.1733387
M60_to_LGA is online now  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 9:35 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,682
Taxes on trans-boarder flights is a shooting self in the foot policy of the Canadian government.

I redeem flights to FL or CA. Flying from YYZ the taxes and fees are usually $150-$175pp. Flying from BUF is $5pp. For a cruise out of FL, including SIL and DIL now, the savings paid for two cruise tickets.

The four most important airports to Canadians are: BLI DTW BUF BTV
tentseller is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 11:14 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Originally Posted by M60_to_LGA
Actually, most of the taxes on cross-border flights are imposed by the Canadians. They have very high taxes even on domestic flights. So there's not much the US can really do (not that it should - what's the compelling US national interest in having more Americans fly to Canada?):

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/why-it-costs-so...nada-1.1733387
Originally Posted by tentseller
Taxes on trans-boarder flights is a shooting self in the foot policy of the Canadian government.

I redeem flights to FL or CA. Flying from YYZ the taxes and fees are usually $150-$175pp. Flying from BUF is $5pp. For a cruise out of FL, including SIL and DIL now, the savings paid for two cruise tickets.

The four most important airports to Canadians are: BLI DTW BUF BTV
Interesting. I knew the US gov't taxes flights coming from Canada, but it would seem the Canadian gov't taxes them even more! The taxes GOING to Canada from the US are quite modest. I just redeemed Avios miles and it was only $5.60 (the US security fee).

It is obviously bad public policy to encourage your citizens to cross the border to fly. You would think Canada would slash the taxes on USA flights to bring this traffic back to Canada.
iahphx is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2015, 4:44 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NB, Canada
Programs: Fairmont, Amex MR, Marriott
Posts: 2,531
Originally Posted by iahphx
It is obviously bad public policy to encourage your citizens to cross the border to fly. You would think Canada would slash the taxes on USA flights to bring this traffic back to Canada.
Why is it bad to have US taxpayers subsidize their airports for our residents?
drwilliams is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2015, 6:35 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC*Tangerine
Posts: 417
Are you saying the routes are cancelled or that the flights are cancelled?

I know that in bad weather, busy airports (e.g. JFK, LGA, EWR) may have to reduce capacity, even if the airport is still open. Thus, the airport orders the airlines to reduce flights. Minor routes with the fewest number of passengers get their flights cancelled first. My bf had his LGA-YOW flight cancelled 2 days in a row last March.
i59bravo is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2015, 10:40 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Originally Posted by i59bravo
Are you saying the routes are cancelled or that the flights are cancelled?

I know that in bad weather, busy airports (e.g. JFK, LGA, EWR) may have to reduce capacity, even if the airport is still open. Thus, the airport orders the airlines to reduce flights. Minor routes with the fewest number of passengers get their flights cancelled first. My bf had his LGA-YOW flight cancelled 2 days in a row last March.
Cancelled routes. I do also have problems with cancelled flights to Canada, but that's just an RJ-reliability issue in bad weather.
iahphx is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2015, 10:12 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: United MileagePlus Silver, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 8,798
Originally Posted by iahphx
It is obviously bad public policy to encourage your citizens to cross the border to fly. You would think Canada would slash the taxes on USA flights to bring this traffic back to Canada.
To me, the 'bad policy' is the subsidies that the American governments (at all levels) provide to the airlines in the USA.

Seems ludicrous that the social safety net in the USA is cut left, right and centre while at the same time billions of tax dollars subsidize air travel.

Apologies to the mods for the journey to P/R.
gglave is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2015, 9:03 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Originally Posted by gglave
To me, the 'bad policy' is the subsidies that the American governments (at all levels) provide to the airlines in the USA.

Seems ludicrous that the social safety net in the USA is cut left, right and centre while at the same time billions of tax dollars subsidize air travel.

Apologies to the mods for the journey to P/R.
Um, I don't think so.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/tedreed/...re-subsidized/
iahphx is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.