Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IAG Half Year 2017 Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2017, 1:54 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,464
IAG Half Year 2017 Results

It looks like, overall, a solid set of numbers:

SIX MONTHS RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

International Consolidated Airlines Group (IAG) today (July 28, 2017) presented Group consolidated results for the six months to June 30, 2017.

IAG period highlights on results:

· Second quarter operating profit €805 million before exceptional items (2016: €555 million)
· Passenger unit revenue for the quarter up 1.5 per cent, up 4.0 per cent at constant currency
· Non-fuel unit costs before exceptional items for the quarter down 0.3 per cent, up 3.5 per cent at constant currency
· Fuel unit costs before exceptional items for the quarter down 10.4 per cent, down 13.2 per cent at constant currency
· Operating profit before exceptional items for the half year €975 million (2016: €710 million), up 37.3 per cent, including the adverse foreign exchange impact for the half year of €44 million
· Cash of €7,944 million at June 30, 2017 was up €1,516 million on 2016 year end
· Adjusted net debt to EBITDAR improved by 0.4 to 1.4 times
Willie Walsh, IAG Chief Executive Officer, said:

"We're reporting a very strong performance in quarter 2 with an operating profit of €805 million before exceptional items which is up from €555 million last year.

"The underlying trend in unit revenue improved, benefitting partially from Easter and a weak base last year.

"Non-fuel unit costs before exceptional items are up, at constant currency. These costs include the financial impact of the power failure which affected British Airways' customers.

"In June, LEVEL started longhaul flights from Barcelona to four destinations. Sales continue to be well ahead of our expectations. We've ordered three additional aircraft and are considering other European bases for the operation."
Source: http://www.iairgroup.com/phoenix.zht...int&ID=2289772

Apparently, the IT fiasco has/will cost £58m.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40750168
rossmacd is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 1:59 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,663
A breakdown of the profits.

'IAG's operating profit for the six months to June 30, 2017 was €975 million before exceptional items, an improvement of €265 million from last year. British Airways made a profit of €741 million before exceptional items (2016: €631 million); Iberia made a profit of €84 million (2016: loss €6 million); Aer Lingus made a profit of €59 million (2016: €42 million) and Vueling's loss was €6 million (2016: loss €54 million).'
BApilotinsider is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 2:03 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
"Ticket prices should rise in the second half when stripping out currency effects, IAG said, joining Air France-KLM in suggesting that network carriers may enjoy a prolonged period of rising airfares. "
Calchas is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 2:08 am
  #4  
Moderator: Qatar Airways
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LHR/NCE/MIA
Programs: BAEC GfL & GGL, SQ Gold, Amex Centurion, Mucci des Chevaliers des Bons Mots et Qui Savent Moucher
Posts: 8,948
I believe WW was on Radio 4 earlier, but I missed him, and only heard Simon Caulder (and a lady who's name I cannot recall) speaking.

M
msm2000uk is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 2:13 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,655
Originally Posted by rossmacd

Apparently, the IT fiasco has/will cost £58m.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40750168
I read it as 'has' and there may be further costs booked in H2.
Dave_C is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 2:16 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DEL
Programs: Mucci du Miel d'Or
Posts: 2,374
I thought the results might be more mixed following the strike and IT failure. But instead I see good results that presumably will only encourage BA to conclude that it's strategy is right.

I don't see that BA will be changing its cost-cutting focus anytime soon.
Dan72 is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 2:29 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,655
Originally Posted by Dan72
I thought the results might be more mixed following the strike and IT failure. But instead I see good results that presumably will only encourage BA to conclude that it's strategy is right.

I don't see that BA will be changing its cost-cutting focus anytime soon.
Sadly, I agree.
Dave_C is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 2:55 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold (thanks to BOB), UA, Flying Blue, Miles & Smiles, Amex BAPP & Platinum
Posts: 392
Well, there you go. The people voted with their feet.
nwmgc is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 3:14 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold4life, ICH RA, Hyatt Gold and others
Posts: 701
And Walsh was quoted during an interview with the BBC saying they will get BA back into a Top 10 carrier over the coming years after being challenged about the "fall" from Worlds Favourite to number 40!!

No substance given though
Mutu is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 3:19 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Programs: BA, IHG, 5C
Posts: 4,413
Originally Posted by Dave_C
I read it as 'has' and there may be further costs booked in H2.
"Other provisions includes a €65 million provision recognised during the period on additional compensation fees and baggage claims related to operational disruption at British Airways due to a power failure in quarter 2, 2017."

They should be taking a charge of the full excepted costs, not just the payouts to date, and appear to have done so.
pauldb is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 3:20 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
Revenues were always going to go up when they started charging for something that used to be free. There is no surprise there.

A key figure is another fall in passenger revenue per RPK, although dont they usually break this up by airline?

Last edited by 1010101; Jul 28, 2017 at 3:54 am
1010101 is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 3:25 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Munich, Algarve, Sussex or S.F Bay Area
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, A3*Gold, AA Plat, HH Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,163
Originally Posted by 1010101
A key figure is another fall in passenger revenue per ASK, although dont they usually break this up by airline?
Isn't that inherent to the LCC / no-frills airline model ?

Increased profits though volumes rather than increased margins?
Tafflyer is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 3:31 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,194
So they are sticking with the 'power failure' excuse? Making it sound like it was the fault of their electricity supplier / national grid rather than one of their own staff / contractors!

but 58m is pretty bad. Bet they are breathing a sigh of relief it's not a lot more due to people not claiming.
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 3:54 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
Originally Posted by Tafflyer
Isn't that inherent to the LCC / no-frills airline model ?

Increased profits though volumes rather than increased margins?
Yes, especially considering passengers are now paying for food that was previously free. They're filling more aircraft but they're doing it with lower fares. Whether the strategy works wont be shown for a couple of years yet.
1010101 is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2017, 4:13 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DEL
Programs: Mucci du Miel d'Or
Posts: 2,374
Originally Posted by 1010101
Revenues were always going to go up when they started charging for something that used to be free. There is no surprise there.
Not if people stopped flying with them, as many suggested would happen.
Dan72 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.