Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

BA Masterclass in Mis-managing IRROPS (LGW-JFK)

BA Masterclass in Mis-managing IRROPS (LGW-JFK)

Old Apr 27, 2017, 2:24 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: in a cabin
Posts: 6,513
Originally Posted by krispy84
Summary: Flight gets cancelled, rebooking and hotel reservations is a bit of a mess.
Where you there? Did you experience the ordeal as reported by the OP?

Posts like this are not helpful nor do they contribute.

Just a thought...

Thanks,
Petrus
Petrus is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 2:36 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,189
Originally Posted by Petrus
Where you there? Did you experience the ordeal as reported by the OP?

Posts like this are not helpful nor do they contribute.

Just a thought...

Thanks,
Petrus
One might suggest that ascribing terms such as "ordeal" to what took place is equally unhelpful, given that you were presumably also not there?
TabTraveller is online now  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 2:39 am
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,453
Originally Posted by rather_be_on_a_griffin
Also a masterclass from FT in how to respond to a perfectly understandable vent; post 4 'it's no big deal' and post 10 'you only have yourself to blame'. I hope we don't get to armchair lawyer disputes, 'that's what insurance is for' or 'QR J>>BA F' too quickly or my drinking game will lead to serious liver damage
Ha ha ha. I really wonder if some of them care more about BA than their own mother and father (or two mothers or two fathers to be compliant with the open ethos of the forum #nohatespeech ).
hugolover is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 2:52 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
In all of this thread, the thing that upset me most was the fact that a young woman and her disabled mother were apparently crying without a hotel room stuck in LGW. Probably they had no idea what EU261 or duty of care means. Not everyone is an FT'er or an armchair lawyer.

If I was there and had the means, I would have booked them a 200 GBP hotel room myself, booked them a cab, charged BA for all that, and give a call to DailyMail and add yet more bad publicity to BA.
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:06 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Munich, Algarve, Sussex or S.F Bay Area
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, A3*Gold, AA Plat, HH Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,126
The OP was was written, not at all argumentative, reasoned and in my opinion restrained under what must have been difficult circumstances.

Trivialising it as one poster did or making excuses for clearly shoddy, though not at all unusual handling from BA is not helpful.

Answering back a Mod after a justified intervention is also not appropriate. What has this place become?

Yes, we've all been in this situation and yes, some of us may have handled it better than the masses flying LGW-JFK once per year but that is no excuse for the airline and certainly no reason to confront the OP, who is clearly not in that category.

BA has a moral and more important legal duty to it's customers which it once again did not fulfil. Worse, it did not fulfil it by policy rather than temporary inability. BA is not alone in this attitude, which is also no excuse for also doing so. It really is about time that airlines started being fined for not meeting their obligations.

Leaving a disabled passenger in tears with no assistence is the icing on the cake that is worthy of far greater censure and punishment.
Tafflyer is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:26 am
  #51  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland / Estonia
Programs: AY+ Platinum, BAEC Silver, airbaltic VIP, HH Diamond, Radisson VIP, IHG Diamond Elite
Posts: 6,510
My bolding

Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
Absolutely CWS but you have to remember many passengers do not have that much money on them to just book a 200 GBP a night hotel without worrying about going over their credit limit, and then waiting for BA to pay them a month or so later. And with the way BA's reputation is at the moment, I doubt many passengers would even believe that BA will pay them for booking their own hotel, even though the regulation provides for it!
Surely people who travel (longhaul) would have either a credit card, cash or a bank card to get some money at the next ATM for any unexpected expenses.
florens is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:27 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by florens
My bolding



Surely people who travel (longhaul) would have either a credit card, cash or a bank card to get some money at the next ATM for any unexpected expenses.
You'd be surprised at the amount of people who are travelling on the trip of a lifetime and spent all their spare money for their trip and do not want to give 200 GBP and worry about never getting it back.
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:28 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
Absolutely CWS but you have to remember many passengers do not have that much money on them to just book a 200 GBP a night hotel without worrying about going over their credit limit, and then waiting for BA to pay them a month or so later. And with the way BA's reputation is at the moment, I doubt many passengers would even believe that BA will pay them for booking their own hotel, even though the regulation provides for it!

BA should have dealt with this better. The main issue here seems to be lack of staffing, and unwillingness to pay for hotels. The fact that people were left without hotels overnight is absolutely disgraceful in my book. This is London, not the Sahara Dessert.
Exactly. I can imagine the stress if this type of thing happened to my parents (80s) or kids (20s) or indeed anyone else who is an inexperienced traveller.

Let's face it, BA don't really give a wotsit in these situations. No point pretending otherwise really.
simons1 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:39 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by florens
Surely people who travel (longhaul) would have either a credit card, cash or a bank card to get some money at the next ATM for any unexpected expenses.
Sorry that is complete tosh.

My daughter (aged 21) has just come back from a holiday in Thailand. She wouldn't immediately have 200 available, nor would she have known what to do in such circumstances.

Many families operate to tight budgets.

The whole 'I would have booked myself a hotel and left it to the next day' routine is frankly nonsense for such people. 90% of passengers wouldn't know the rules, or that 200 is the accepted amount. Not to mention the risk of BA then denying the claim with their usual excuses. Why don't the airline just do the job properly? You do have to laugh at some of this 'defend BA at all costs' forum content.
simons1 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:41 am
  #55  
V10
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Provincie Antwerpen, Vlaanderen, Belgi
Programs: MUCCI Gold
Posts: 2,511
Originally Posted by florens
Surely people who travel (longhaul) would have either a credit card, cash or a bank card to get some money at the next ATM for any unexpected expenses.
One of the less palatable aspects of this forum as far as I am concerned is the assumption that all travellers know exactly what to do in these situations, and that they have the means (financial and other) to take matters in their own hands. It's far too easy to ascribe the capabilities and means available to frequent and experienced travellers (largely in premium cabins) to 100% of people who turn up at an airport in order to travel.

Even less palatable is the unwritten view undoubtably held by some that people who can't or won't deal with this themselves for financial or other reasons shouldn't be travelling at all.
V10 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:41 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Munich, Algarve, Sussex or S.F Bay Area
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, A3*Gold, AA Plat, HH Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,126
Originally Posted by simons1
Exactly. I can imagine the stress if this type of thing happened to my parents (80s) or kids (20s) or indeed anyone else who is an inexperienced traveller.

Let's face it, BA don't really give a wotsit in these situations. No point pretending otherwise really.
Indeed. I have often purchased tickets for relatives to come and visit us in various locations and many would not have had the resources to simply shell out 200 for a hotel room. And by now, none of them would ever again assume that they would be able to reecover it from BA without at least some hassle. But then again, the chances that I would be flying them on BA to visit us is also much lower than before and diminishing further with every one of these stories I read.
Tafflyer is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:42 am
  #57  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland / Estonia
Programs: AY+ Platinum, BAEC Silver, airbaltic VIP, HH Diamond, Radisson VIP, IHG Diamond Elite
Posts: 6,510
Originally Posted by simons1
Sorry that is complete tosh.

My daughter (aged 21) has just come back from a holiday in Thailand. She wouldn't immediately have 200 available, nor would she have known what to do in such circumstances.

Many families operate to tight budgets.

The whole 'I would have booked myself a hotel and left it to the next day' routine is frankly nonsense for such people. 90% of passengers wouldn't know the rules, or that 200 is the accepted amount. Not to mention the risk of BA then denying the claim with their usual excuses. Why don't the airline just do the job properly? You do have to laugh at some of this 'defend BA at all costs' forum content.
Blaiming people for not having any money on them has nothing to do with defending BA.

I do agree on the bad IRRPOS handling, but this has nothing to do with it.

Also nowadays where everyone has a smartphone or tablet, I don't understand why people don't google their rights during IRROPS.
florens is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:42 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 404
Originally Posted by florens
Surely people who travel (longhaul) would have either a credit card, cash or a bank card to get some money at the next ATM for any unexpected expenses.
Is not a question about money, is a question about duty of care.

You are assuming everyone is an experienced traveller who speaks fluent english and knows how how to move around in London.

But most probably at least half of the people in the flight travel just 1-2 times per year, some of them would not speak to much english (some of them none at all) and I would not be surprised if for some it was the first time in London (especially if they were connecting from EU).

So 'book a hotel by yourself and go to LHR tomorrow' is NOT a good way of handle things. Even when IB overbooked by 40 my MAN-MAD christmas flight last year and made a big mess on the rebooking, at least the handling agents stayed with us until 2am to be sure everyone have an hotel room (they booked us hotels 45min from the airport as all the hotels nearby the airport and the city).
schrodingerdog is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 3:46 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,189
Originally Posted by simons1
Sorry that is complete tosh.

My daughter (aged 21) has just come back from a holiday in Thailand. She wouldn't immediately have 200 available, nor would she have known what to do in such circumstances.

Many families operate to tight budgets.

The whole 'I would have booked myself a hotel and left it to the next day' routine is frankly nonsense for such people. 90% of passengers wouldn't know the rules, or that 200 is the accepted amount. Not to mention the risk of BA then denying the claim with their usual excuses. Why don't the airline just do the job properly? You do have to laugh at some of this 'defend BA at all costs' forum content.
I know it's often trotted out on FT, but if you know that your travel insurance covers you for this type of thing then surely you book what your policy would allow and then let your insurer sort it out with BA. One doesn't need to know the rules or whether 200 is usually accepted.

Whilst I appreciate that many families operate to a budget, not travelling with a credit card that has at least a few hundred pounds of credit on it for emergencies is pretty foolish. Many responsible parents give their kids a credit card for exactly this type of situation.
TabTraveller is online now  
Old Apr 27, 2017, 4:10 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAEC Silver, IHG Diamond
Posts: 7,699
The first time I had a cancelled flight, I had no idea what to do.
I just rang my travel insurance company up assuming they would sort things out for me then and there but I had to sort things out myself and then claim later.

I'm sure most people would assume the airline would deal with things if something goes wrong rather than being expected to do everything yourself.

Not everyone has 10k+ limits like a lot of people have here.
Maybe funds and already allocated to something or are due to be i.e. car hire, hotels taking 150 a night as a security deposit that doesn't get returned for 1-3 weeks etc.
A lot of people may be happier with cash so may be carrying that (or in the bank) rather than on a card.

It does give the impression here from various posters that the airline is actually doing you a favour by possibly letting you fly. If something goes wrong, it's always your fault and you should be prepared for the consequences.
xenole is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.