Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

A380 G-XLEB SFO-LHR diverted to YVR due to staff sickness [25 Oct 2016]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A380 G-XLEB SFO-LHR diverted to YVR due to staff sickness [25 Oct 2016]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2016, 8:17 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PHX
Programs: UA Premier Gold 1MM
Posts: 190
Having only recently taken off from SFO, wonder how close the aircraft was to Maximum Landing Weight. Looking at the Flight Aware tracking, doesn't seem it circled, although I suppose it could have been dumping fuel from Calgary to Vancouver.
lsbuffs is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 8:19 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Programs: BA Gold for Life
Posts: 1,389
BA.COM showing the flight due to arrive into LHR at 19:10. Presume that is just a ferry flight with no passengers.
Rubecula is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 8:22 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 72
BBC now reporting it

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37761980

"Twenty-five crew members went to local hospitals as a precaution but were later discharged, said BA spokeswoman Michele Kropf.

The crew were not treated for smoke inhalation as reported, she said."
Where am I today? is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 8:38 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA
Posts: 174
Twenty-five crew members went to local hospitals as a precaution but were later discharged, said BA spokeswoman Michele Kropf.
I know there are lots of crew on an A380 but surely 25 would be all of them including Pilots?!
The Ginge is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 8:57 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, CA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 669
Originally Posted by Rubecula
BA.COM showing the flight due to arrive into LHR at 19:10. Presume that is just a ferry flight with no passengers.
BA.com shows the flight as having left at 2 AM (it landed at around midnight). That's an impressively fast turn-around considering the entire crew was taken sick (and would have eventually run out of hours). I wonder if they had an A380 crew standing-by in Vancouver? The daily Vancouver service is back to 747 so wouldn't really know why an A380 crew would be here.
theultimateflyer is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 9:04 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA, CX, AS, DL / Hilton, SPG
Posts: 153
Originally Posted by The Ginge
I know there are lots of crew on an A380 but surely 25 would be all of them including Pilots?!
http://www.avherald.com/h?article=49fd405e&opt=0
RunningforMiles is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 9:13 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold
Posts: 6,911
Good to hear that all pax and crew are safe and sound and hopefully everyone will make it back to LHR soon.
totti is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 9:18 am
  #38  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Marriott Bonvoy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Englandshire
Programs: SPG LT Plat, BA G, BD*LG, MG Blue+ ...
Posts: 16,017
Originally Posted by RunningforMiles
Declaring an emergency when 680nm away from Vancouver, and landing there 30 minutes later ?
Oxon Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 10:35 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,100
Originally Posted by Oxon Flyer
Declaring an emergency when 680nm away from Vancouver, and landing there 30 minutes later ?
This has been fixed since but the post makes no sense: "Accident: British Airways A388 near Vancouver on Oct 24th 2016, 25 treated for smoke inhalation" and then later " none of the occupants was treated for smoke inhalation". Erm, what?
chx1975 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 10:51 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by chx1975
This has been fixed since but the post makes no sense: "Accident: British Airways A388 near Vancouver on Oct 24th 2016, 25 treated for smoke inhalation" and then later " none of the occupants was treated for smoke inhalation". Erm, what?
The real Sun quotes a BA spoke as saying they "can't confirm it was smoke inhalation":

http://vancouversun.com/news/local-n...-with-ill-crew
chucko is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 11:03 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Herts, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, HH Diamond.
Posts: 3,176
also seems strange all crew were affected, but relatively no pax?

would pax have had air masks deployed hence being OK?
stewaran is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 11:11 am
  #42  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,736
Originally Posted by stewaran
also seems strange all crew were affected, but relatively no pax?

would pax have had air masks deployed hence being OK?
My suspicion is that someone (London? the Commander? the local transportation agency? a doctor?) made the decision that all crew would be checked out, as a precaution, even if they hadn't reported or seen anything (which would surely apply to the flight deck); but those directly affecting were a few cabin crew plus a few passengers in one particular area of the lower deck.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 11:21 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Herts, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, HH Diamond.
Posts: 3,176
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
My suspicion is that someone (London? the Commander? the local transportation agency? a doctor?) made the decision that all crew would be checked out, as a precaution, even if they hadn't reported or seen anything (which would surely apply to the flight deck); but those directly affecting were a few cabin crew plus a few passengers in one particular area of the lower deck.
I guess they need that crew to fly the A380 home today/tomorrow not a bad idea to make sure they are all fit :-)

although as you say from pilot at the nose, to crew at the back all checked out. but presumably (from the sparse information available) pax seating just a few seats away not sent to hospital.
stewaran is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 12:07 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Programs: BA Bronze
Posts: 181
Out of curiosity what would happen if you aren't allowed into Canada? I know they have very strict rules about foreign visitors with a background not squeaky clean and prior waivers? Suppose they can't leave you on the plane on the other hand?

Hope everyone is not in too much distress and recovers soon!
CountryKerry is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016, 1:09 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Programs: BA Gold, Geek platinum
Posts: 2,004
25 people with smoke inhalation? What would that many crew be doing standing in one place during a flight?

Without appearing to be too indelicate but has a case of the trots due to the crew having a dodgy meal the night before been ruled out?
Joely is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.