Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

Changes to Gold Guest List Qualification Criteria

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Changes to Gold Guest List Qualification Criteria

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:36 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Manchester, UK
Programs: BAEC Gold, Alitalia Freccia Alata, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 52
Originally Posted by BlackBerryAddict
That makes quite a gap between 1500 for Gold and 5000 for GGL. It might be better after Gold to credit to other oneworld programs - or even non-oneworld programs.
Quite. I will achieve Gold with 10 months left on my year, and 4-5 long haul trips planned in that time. I will fly with BA if I am in Y, but if any of these flights are in J there is little point in using BA, as the tier points I will accrue will not be sufficient to reach a higher status, and I can get avios easily through other means. When a loyalty program is not producing a motivation to be loyal for J flights it rather suggests there is something a little awry.
tobaornottoba is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:39 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: GGLfL
Posts: 1,126
Originally Posted by jmc1K
Gotta say, this one doesn't hurt my feelings. I've had a sense of GGL service levels and accommodations slipping lately.
I agree. Call centre wait times are not what they used to be. The "special" and "exclusive" feel was lost years ago.

I doubt that the TP runners (aka GGL abusers) make up anything but a tiny minority of GGL members, and are not the issue.

The issue is just that 3000 TPs is not that hard to get and there are too many GGL members to deliver the personal and special service which was originally intended.
MrSimonR is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:39 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Edinburgh
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 9,034
Originally Posted by jmc1K
Gotta say, this one doesn't hurt my feelings. I've had a sense of GGL service levels and accommodations slipping lately. Hopefully this will reverse that trend. Now, time to add the escorts & tarmac transfers please.
Paralytic is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:43 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cumbria
Programs: BA, Marriott, Hertz, Dennis The Menace Fan Club
Posts: 2,015
Originally Posted by MrSimonR
The issue is just that 3000 TPs is not that hard to get and there are too many GGL members to deliver the personal and special service which was originally intended.
Depends on your flying patterns though. I made 3k TPs last year and probably will this year, via domestic, ET and a couple of long haul WT flights. Nearly 200 legs each year. I think that was pretty hard to get and there is no longer any incentive to do that again, apart from creeping ever nearer to the magical 35k for Lifetime Gold. Then again, BA will probably lift that bar too.
nobbyclark is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:47 am
  #50  
Moderator: Qatar Airways
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LHR/NCE/MIA
Programs: BAEC GfL & GGL, SQ Gold, Amex Centurion, Mucci des Chevaliers des Bons Mots et Qui Savent Moucher
Posts: 8,944
Surely it is now just a matter of time before the other thresholds are raised...

Bronze to 400
Silver to 1,000
Gold to 2,000

Those would be my guesses - remember the travel market has bounced back since the crash in 2008-2010, and so I suppose BA has noticed the trend hence the move upward
msm2000uk is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:51 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: LHR / LAS
Programs: BA GfL, GGL/CCR
Posts: 2,409
I really cant see this change being down to those riffraff TP runners .

If it was then surely the renewal qualification would also have been 5000 TP.

Maybe, with the economy 'booming' , there are just more people flying at the moment in premium cabins.
crazyarmadillo is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 3:56 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Programs: BA GGL/CCR
Posts: 370
Originally Posted by Paralytic
Lol. Not sure Mrs. jmc1k would appreciate that.
jmc1K is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:01 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: TLV/ATH/LON/EZE/NYC/UIP
Programs: BA*GGL, A3*G, AF*P, VS*S
Posts: 1,011
Cost/benefit ratio was probably considered quite carefully but I definitely fall on the wrong side of it.

I am now cancelling a couple of CW rev flights I wedged in to ensure I crossed 3,000 TPs before 8th Feb, and now will not be booking a TLV-LHR-USA/LatAm rev J ticket for the summer as part of getting 3,000 TPs in 2015. May as well do it all on OB and Avios (who knows when they will be devalued anyway?!) and just scrape my usual 1,500 TPs.

What a pity.
frb98mf is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:01 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,436
Originally Posted by LondonElite
This, and/or a minimum 'spend' on BA. That would be a lot smarter, in my view, than sending money into AA's coffers from some TP running.
Totally agree.

I am directly affected by this change- I was going to hit the first year / 3k TPs this membership year and with an increase in the amount of F travel that I am currently taking would make 3k TPs 2015/16 too.

Having said that, I have always been a bit unconvinced by the GGL benefits if you don't have the CCR card (my wife has her own status so I don't need partner cards, the GGL line might be 'wonderful' but honestly the silver line has done everything I ever needed, lack of change fees is something but in truth I don't change award booking much anyway).

I will still fly BA but instead concentrate on LTG as a goal.
crazy8534 is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:05 am
  #55  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by jmc1K
Now, time to add the escorts & tarmac transfers please.
I don't think BA will go the way of condoning mile-high behaviour, much less subsidise it, but it would be an interesting benefit.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:07 am
  #56  
Hilton Contributor BadgeAccor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bristol, UK
Programs: HH D, Rad Plat
Posts: 5,352
Given the change to the entry level of GGL, and the double TP's over Gold to maintain GGL...will BA finally recognise GGL as a new tier please?

In other words a soft landing to gold if threshold are not met.

Only seems fair given the change to entry and it is obvious, now more than ever that GGL is Gold, Gold is Silver, Silver is Silver and Bronze is very nice as well.

Glad I didn't do my TP run plan for the new year, silver is good enough and now ranges from 600 TP's to 5000!
BotB is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:07 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Programs: Mucci, BA, Hilton.
Posts: 1,158
Originally Posted by LondonElite
This, and/or a minimum 'spend' on BA. That would be a lot smarter, in my view, than sending money into AA's coffers from some TP running.
This to me is a much better idea. A revenue based system would be much fairer although probably impossible to apply in practice.
MickV is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:26 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ireland
Programs: VS Silver, EK Gold, BA GGL/CCR
Posts: 487
Interesting change and would agree with c-w-s's assertion that the grandfathering of existing members with the 3k renewal threshold seems to imply those in the 3-5k TP range are a little too valuable to BA to risk alienating them with this change.

Hopefully this reduction in GGL volume is paving the way for some additional improvements in the ground handling experience at LHR as alluded to by another poster some time ago.
Aztec_Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:36 am
  #59  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,888
Originally Posted by MickV
This to me is a much better idea. A revenue based system would be much fairer although probably impossible to apply in practice.
There are problems with both points based systems and revenue based systems both for passengers and the airline. Both types mean some folks gain and some lose out. So suggest one is fairer than another is a little over simplistic.

Anyway, there have been many discussions about this in the past and I am sure there will be many threads in the furture - and this isn't a thread to discuss the merits of a revenue based system so I won't go any further in to it.
KARFA is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2014, 4:37 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Programs: BA CCR/GGL, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,483
Originally Posted by crazy8534
I will still fly BA but instead concentrate on LTG as a goal.
The GGL change doesn't impact me, as the gap between 1,500 and 3,000 was too high for me, as a leisure traveller, to bridge. If the Gold threshold is increased to (say) 2,000 or 2,500 I'll simply not bother trying.

I too am keeping an eye on LTG, but fear that it will be scrapped by the time I get there.
LondonAndy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.