Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cabin Crews' Worst Route?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2014, 1:56 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 597
I haven't operated a LAS (yet) and I don't have an urgent desire of doing so. It's a 3-class aircraft to/from LGW... I've done a few IBZs and they're very hard work. Then again, any flight can be really hard work, depending on the timing of the flight, time of year etc.

I do like doing JER flights though. Quick flight time, rush rush rush, but the customers are always great, and it's fun to challenge the flight crew to set new speeding records
Yesitsme is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:00 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: LHR- ish
Programs: MUCCI, BA Blue
Posts: 4,295
One crew member told me she didn't like ICN, not sure why - don't know if it was her least favourite route though.
exilencfc is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:04 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK. BAEC AAdvantage
Programs: Mucci Des Oeufs Brouilles et des Canards
Posts: 3,671
Over the years, I've met different crews from different airlines and Mumbai was the least favourite from BA, NW (now Delta) and QF crews (not sure if they still fly there).
dddc is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:11 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KT7
Programs: BA & BD Gold Once Upon a Time
Posts: 530
A layover in RUH can't be much fun.
Oil-man is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:22 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
You would be surprised.
Can I help you is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:27 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: Mucci de la Cuisine Aérienne du Réseau Courte Durée de British Airways
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by OldHigsonian
In Y on most transatlantic routes it looks like they have a couple hours of frantic activity followed by many hours of relative peace. The odd person brave enough to press the button and occassional visits to the galley.

I would expect in F there is more of a constant stream of serving to be done.

Of course on a route like Las Vegas the button pressing and visting is probably much more frequent.
I don't think so, in WT it is harder to sleep for the passengers and the crew therefore have a constant flow of customers often wanting to chat to the crew but in First they tend to be comfy and asleep and it is much more quiet after the service. Completely the opposite really.
Remember there are 3 crew up the front and 14 passengers, down the back there are 4 or 5 with 150-200 passengers.
Littlegirl is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:28 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,519
The thing is: for crew, I imagine there are so many different reasons to like a roster or not: it could be that the flight is "hard work" on the passengers' side as some have said, it could be the timings, the length of the time off, it could be the city itself, or the hotel where BA puts them up, etc. It could even be that some routes might be more crowded than others (e.g. cabin configuration, loads) or that some planes might be more pleasant to fly than others (e.g. crew/pax ratio)? I imagine that some routes might even be more pleasant in some seasons than in others. I would guess that different crew members weigh those different elements in different ways (or even that for some, priorities could change at different times in their life and carrier, ie it might be better to explore far flung exotic destinations for a single crew and more tempting to get a more "compact" roster if they have a family with small children?) I may be completely off the mark though.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:31 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: Mucci de la Cuisine Aérienne du Réseau Courte Durée de British Airways
Posts: 4,704
I have a feeling that the night IBZ out of EDI this Summer will be very hard work for our Mixed Fleet crew as many of the customers will be in the party mood!
Littlegirl is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:33 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: Mucci de la Cuisine Aérienne du Réseau Courte Durée de British Airways
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by orbitmic
The thing is: for crew, I imagine there are so many different reasons to like a roster or not: it could be that the flight is "hard work" on the passengers' side as some have said, it could be the timings, the length of the time off, it could be the city itself, or the hotel where BA puts them up, etc. It could even be that some routes might be more crowded than others (e.g. cabin configuration, loads) or that some planes might be more pleasant to fly than others (e.g. crew/pax ratio)? I imagine that some routes might even be more pleasant in some seasons than in others. I would guess that different crew members weigh those different elements in different ways (or even that for some, priorities could change at different times in their life and carrier, ie it might be better to explore far flung exotic destinations for a single crew and more tempting to get a more "compact" roster if they have a family with small children?) I may be completely off the mark though.
Yes, different crew like different destinations for many different reasons!
Littlegirl is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:41 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Programs: BA Exec
Posts: 647
As Littlegirl has said, it's personal preferences. We fly to a large number of destinations, each flight has it's own unique characteristics and it's horses for courses really. Example: Kuwait is probably my favourite. Quick flight time on a 747, two free Breakfasts at the hotel, very nice souk with cheap and healthy food. Nice, easy trip.

I'm sure some people wouldn't like it though!
Bar Operator is online now  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 2:47 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Robin Hood Territory
Programs: BA Silver, MUCCI des Soins Medicaux, Le médecin personnel ŕ PUCCI GALORE
Posts: 1,613
Originally Posted by baggageinhall
One former crew member told me that they much prefered serving Y to F given that 'the expectations of a Y passenger are generally a lot lower and they are grateful for what they get, the reverse being true in F'.
I think it's a good job that they 'saw the light' then

I'm sure there are plenty of arses in whichever class they fly, however if you are going to chose a hospitality industry in which to work then one must be flexible to the demands of that industry. If BA set their service to match the lowest expectations (god forbid I should give them ideas) then we are all doomed… It's not a flying Harvester.
badoc is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 3:40 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: York, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, Hilton Diamond, Marriott GOLD, Accor Club Gold
Posts: 709
I fly TLV frequently, and I have had more than one crew make plain to me they find it a uniquely trying route - and all the worse since it went narrow-bodied. It has perks (one of the shortest long haul flights, with a nice TLV hotel between the flights, etc - but the behaviour of the pax can be very wearisome indeed, and often with a very high percentage of special meals to boot....
DominicB is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 4:10 pm
  #28  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, VS Gold
Posts: 274
Originally Posted by DominicB
and often with a very high percentage of special meals to boot....
When I flew back from Tel Aviv on Monday night they ran out of kosher meals! It must take a special kind of (lack of planning) to do that on that route. The chap next to me, who had pre-ordered, wasn't happy as it was Passover so he couldn't eat the vegetarian (pasta) option he was offered instead (ie no flour for Passover). Cabin Service Director gave him 4000 Avios on the spot, but still a rather major fail by whichever department is in charge of such things.
Whenderson is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 4:24 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA
Posts: 2,368
Originally Posted by badoc
I think it's a good job that they 'saw the light' then

I'm sure there are plenty of arses in whichever class they fly, however if you are going to chose a hospitality industry in which to work then one must be flexible to the demands of that industry. If BA set their service to match the lowest expectations (god forbid I should give them ideas) then we are all doomed… It's not a flying Harvester.
Quite! I couldn't think of a more unsuitable person to be a crew member. Without going into detail it wasn't their true calling and they did the job with their nose in the air.
baggageinhall is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2014, 5:09 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London-etc
Posts: 3,893
Crew used to tell me the Tel Aviv and Delhi were not exactly the most fun routes for them. One was because the pay they got. Not sure if that has changed
Polomarc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.