Al Ex
Mar 10, 08, 4:55 am
Not a lot info from Russian TV, but - QF is going to Moscow from 01 of June 2008.
Does anybody any clear information about these plans? :confused:
Does anybody any clear information about these plans? :confused:
Qantas Frequent Flyer - Qantas to MOW from Jun,01
View Full Version : Qantas to MOW from Jun,01
bensyd
Mar 10, 08, 4:59 am
Are you sure? This has not been flagged by QF anywhere and I'm not sure MOW is high on their list of priorities
eoinnz
Mar 10, 08, 5:07 am
Qantas is not flying to Russia from June. Somebody has got their wires crossed.
moa999
Mar 10, 08, 5:25 am
How long does the 747 sit at LHR for waiting for the Kangaroo route turnaround?
I always thought QF should wetlease their planes to a US/UK operator and get them flown JFK-LHR during the down time. Keep the birds in the air and keep earning some cash.
I always thought QF should wetlease their planes to a US/UK operator and get them flown JFK-LHR during the down time. Keep the birds in the air and keep earning some cash.
og
Mar 10, 08, 6:14 am
Codeshare on BA or SU metal?
Traveloguy
Mar 10, 08, 6:52 am
How long does the 747 sit at LHR for waiting for the Kangaroo route turnaround?
I always thought QF should wetlease their planes to a US/UK operator and get them flown JFK-LHR during the down time. Keep the birds in the air and keep earning some cash.
Letting someone else use your planes means someone else controls your brand which is something I am sure QF would be keen to protect. Also how many carriers want to fly a plane branded with someone else's product?
I always thought QF should wetlease their planes to a US/UK operator and get them flown JFK-LHR during the down time. Keep the birds in the air and keep earning some cash.
Letting someone else use your planes means someone else controls your brand which is something I am sure QF would be keen to protect. Also how many carriers want to fly a plane branded with someone else's product?
bensyd
Mar 10, 08, 8:42 am
Letting someone else use your planes means someone else controls your brand which is something I am sure QF would be keen to protect. Also how many carriers want to fly a plane branded with someone else's product?
iirc QF planes are occasionally used during the summer months for charter flights ex LON to the Canary Islands etc....
I don't think QF would loose control of their brand by wet leasing. The flights would still be crewed by QF just sold under a different name, no different to codeshares really.
iirc QF planes are occasionally used during the summer months for charter flights ex LON to the Canary Islands etc....
I don't think QF would loose control of their brand by wet leasing. The flights would still be crewed by QF just sold under a different name, no different to codeshares really.
Traveloguy
Mar 10, 08, 9:43 am
iirc QF planes are occasionally used during the summer months for charter flights ex LON to the Canary Islands etc....
I don't think QF would loose control of their brand by wet leasing. The flights would still be crewed by QF just sold under a different name, no different to codeshares really.
A daily service however is a little different to the odd canary run though! ;)
I don't think QF would loose control of their brand by wet leasing. The flights would still be crewed by QF just sold under a different name, no different to codeshares really.
A daily service however is a little different to the odd canary run though! ;)
willyroo
Mar 10, 08, 3:40 pm
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=319751
bensyd
Mar 10, 08, 3:42 pm
A daily service however is a little different to the odd canary run though! ;)
True that, but a codeshare isn't ;)
True that, but a codeshare isn't ;)
DownUnderFlyer
Mar 10, 08, 4:09 pm
Maybe QF just wants to codeshare with JL NRT-DME or with BA?