Hilton HHonors - Embassy Suites in Rogers, Arkansas, a few notes




SkeptiCallie
Nov 15, 07, 8:25 pm
If any of you plan to stay at the Embassy Suites in Rogers, Arkansas, you might want to know that they have added a new building which is attached to the existing one. I surmise that they had so much business from the WalMart/Tyson chicken/football, etc., traffic, that they needed a place for the overflow. We were there to see the Ozark fall leaf colors, and Rogers was very crowded. We considered ourselves fortunate to have found room at the ES, as often it is full.

The Hilton website photograph does not show a picture of the new building, or it didn't a few days ago when I checked anyway. The text does mention it, however. There is a spa in the new building and a number of rooms. There is also a computer for public use on the first floor of the addition that is free. Computer usage in the rooms is charged for.

The new building has six floors. The primary ES building has more, I think nine. I suppose I should check, but anyhow--.

We were assigned the new building. Our suite was considered an upgrade. Impressions: The decoration was in a muted grayed-brown color scheme. Evidently the main building has reddish-brown or reddish accent colors, but our suite did not. I thought it was quite drab. The bathroom was comparatively small. There were two flat-screen TVs.

We were nevertheless happy with the choice because the room was so new. It was also very quiet. We didn't see any other people on our floor (sixth floor). I can't say that I personally liked the color scheme.

The new addition has an atrium, just as the main building does. But it also is much quieter in decoration and much more subdued than the primary building. I suppose it is just a matter of taste as to which one prefers.

The buildings are connected, of course, with only a few extra steps to go from the check-in desk at the existing building to the elevators of the new one.

On our first day, someone slipped an envelope under our door containing a coupon for a free appetizer or dessert at their restaurant. We ordered, asking a waiter near the manager's-reception area to bring it to our table there--having chosen from the restaurant menu posted inside the elevator. We were brought a different order. It turns out that the restaurant menu posted in the elevator is "new," and the kitchen hasn't coordinated its menus with the posted menu yet. Oh, well. . . . :)

The evening reception was better than nothing. Drinks were a dollar. Milk (yes, I admit to knowing about this :) ) was free. They brought as many cartons of low-fat milk as I asked for. Snacks were dry pretzel-like or toasted-chex-like stuff plus popcorn. Nothing else. Commendably, the snacks were kept in cylinders that dispensed if one pressed a button. I appreciated the sanitation, as it is always a problem if people have to get snacks from a communal container.

Breakfast is evidently a matter of pride for the ES staff, judging by a comment one of them made. I consider all ES breakfasts to be, by definition, excellent, when compared with non-ES breakfasts (a few regular Hiltons being the exception), but this one was not one of the best of the ES line-up. Waits at the omelet-and-meat ordering counter were too long. Food was mostly bland. And there were doughnuts put out in boxes that indicated the doughnuts had come from a local place. (I think the regulars at the ES probably LIKE those doughnuts, however! :) )

Check-in was a little snippy but not a lot. Good stay, but not a great stay.

Anyhow, the above is intended for someone who plans to be in Rogers (if anyone does) and who wants information on the ES. I wouldn't go out of my way to stay at the Rogers ES again, but if I were ever in Rogers again, I would mildly prefer to stay there. (If that makes sense--IOW, a sort-of recommendation.)


ijgordon
Nov 18, 07, 5:04 pm
Anyhow, the above is intended for someone who plans to be in Rogers (if anyone does) and who wants information on the ES. I wouldn't go out of my way to stay at the Rogers ES again, but if I were ever in Rogers again, I would mildly prefer to stay there. (If that makes sense--IOW, a sort-of recommendation.)
Thanks for the insight. So if you were in the NW Arkansas area again, where would you prefer to stay? I've been at the ES several times for Wal-Mart corporate events and found it to be a very good choice. Certainly better than the Holiday Inn in Springdale that they used to use for these events.

SkeptiCallie
Nov 18, 07, 7:52 pm
Thanks for the insight. So if you were in the NW Arkansas area again, where would you prefer to stay? I've been at the ES several times for Wal-Mart corporate events and found it to be a very good choice. Certainly better than the Holiday Inn in Springdale that they used to use for these events.

My primary reason for posting was to notify people that there is a new addition, on the theory that a lot of people prefer staying at new rooms. The Hilton website doesn't have a picture of the new building yet (though it does mention it in the text), so I was intending my comments to be helpful in that regard.

But in answer to your question, I would probably stay at the ES again. I might consider Country Inn and Suites. I have no idea what the Country Inn is like, but both it and Hilton Homewood Suites, which were located side by side (I think--don't guarantee the "perfect recall" bit ;) ) looked attractive.

I stayed at a Doubletree Club in Springdale last year or thereabouts, and would not stay there again. In all fairness, I had the last room Doubletree had available so shouldn't have expected much. Still, the breakfast, or whatever the Doubletree that day cared to call mediocre-food-served-with-an-attitude, didn't exactly inspire me to return. And various choices in Eureka Springs and Fayetteville, motel chains on down the pecking order, haven't been attractive.

I'm going to rephrase this and hope that I get it right this time. I would return to some towns specifically for the hotel. I would return to Hot Springs specifically for the ES in Hot Springs. The Hot Springs ES got it right, with an enthusiastic, welcoming attitude, not to mention some very authentic pancakes that I couldn't have but enjoyed seeing. ;) Rogers, well, no, I wouldn't go to Rogers just to stay at the ES. That's not to say that I wouldn't stay at the Rogers ES should I find myself back in Rogers again.

BTW, one thing I failed to note in my OP: I did miss having grits on the buffet line at breakfast. (I'm trying to be reasonable about not having grits, but still. . . . :) )

My DH and I are probably becoming a little too pampered these days, thanks to Hilton, and we can't complain about that. :)

Yes, I agree with you that the Rogers ES is probably, if not certainly, the best choice of the area. It is comfortable and consistent. We found the hotel itself excellent--it is a fairly new ES after all--with atmosphere a trifle brusque but that is because it is very busy, presumably the number one choice in the area, and is presumably principally a business hotel. Impressions as to atmosphere can change several times a day, so I state this FWIW, with the caveat that others might well have entirely different impressions, and so might we on a subsequent visit.

P.S. You didn't get those doughnuts, did you? :p Are they affecting your opinion? :D (Joking!)


AnthemAVM
Nov 23, 07, 6:10 pm
The Rogers ES is very nice hotel, great about the new rooms.



SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0