GateHold
Aug 24, 07, 3:24 pm
This week's Ask the Pilot article on Salon.com tackles the always irritating concept of designing commercial aircraft without pilots. This idea is brought up over and over, usually by researchers and engineers, yet rarely do we hear from a pilot's point of view.
Here are some excerpts from the piece...
<<< Even the Economist, an august publication for sure, but notorious for distortions in its aviation coverage, recently did a piece on it. We don’t hear about proposals for doctorless hospitals or for courtrooms with computerized juries. We understand the limitations of such ideas. The challenges of flight are no easier to surmount, yet again and again we’re told how feasible it will soon be to engineer pilots out of the picture. Bollocks.
We get the usual far-fetched predictions from engineers and scientists and professors speculating how within 20 years pilotless planes will be whisking around the globe, guided by onboard electronics and/or remote control. That’s fine, it’s not necessarily a researcher’s job to be realistic or practical. But they are blindly enamored of their silicon wafers, ignoring the boundless, practical contingencies of commercial flight -- things that that no electric box can, now or in the foreseeable future, be wired to appraise. >>>
To read the full article, click here:
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2007/08/24/askthepilot242/
Entry to Salon is free. (Watch for the “skip this ad” prompt.)
Here are some excerpts from the piece...
<<< Even the Economist, an august publication for sure, but notorious for distortions in its aviation coverage, recently did a piece on it. We don’t hear about proposals for doctorless hospitals or for courtrooms with computerized juries. We understand the limitations of such ideas. The challenges of flight are no easier to surmount, yet again and again we’re told how feasible it will soon be to engineer pilots out of the picture. Bollocks.
We get the usual far-fetched predictions from engineers and scientists and professors speculating how within 20 years pilotless planes will be whisking around the globe, guided by onboard electronics and/or remote control. That’s fine, it’s not necessarily a researcher’s job to be realistic or practical. But they are blindly enamored of their silicon wafers, ignoring the boundless, practical contingencies of commercial flight -- things that that no electric box can, now or in the foreseeable future, be wired to appraise. >>>
To read the full article, click here:
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2007/08/24/askthepilot242/
Entry to Salon is free. (Watch for the “skip this ad” prompt.)