JetBlue TrueBlue - should let jetblue fly nonstop MCO-OAK?

Hi all,

I have been found out about information daily passengers flies MCO-OAK but, there are 236 daily passengers flies from MCO-OAK. I think B6 would likely to begin nonstop MCO-OAK anytime soon. I was thinking about jetblue would be same time when will ever start MCO-OAK. It has been doing good for the average more than 230 daily passengers from MCO-OAK. Anyone to give me out when B6 will have more routes to OAK. Thanks all! :)

Regards

I agree, I think MCO-OAK is very likely...especially with the recent growth at FLL. Althoguh it is a transcon, the market is still vital and potentially profitable.

My bets for 2007/2008: MCO-OAK, MCO-SAN, MCO-AUS; FLL-LAS!!!

I agree, I think MCO-OAK is very likely...especially with the recent growth at FLL. Althoguh it is a transcon, the market is still vital and potentially profitable.

My bets for 2007/2008: MCO-OAK, MCO-SAN, MCO-AUS; FLL-LAS!!!

And even more FLL-SAN, FLL-SEA, FLL-PHX. I heard O/D 356 daily passengers who flies from MCO-SAN. I have been found out more information with website. Also, there is something else for MCO-SJC has been more than 200 daily passengers. What I can think about airlines should let more nonstop MCO-SJC. :confused:

Here it is with the website came from:

http://www.faremeasure.com/airports/Airport-Orlando_Florida.html

Thanks all! :)

I think B6 will be slow to add another CA to MCO flight after the failure of BUR-MCO.

And even more FLL-SAN, FLL-SEA, FLL-PHX. I heard O/D 356 daily passengers who flies from MCO-SAN. I have been found out more information with website. Also, there is something else for MCO-SJC has been more than 200 daily passengers. What I can think about airlines should let more nonstop MCO-SJC. :confused:

Here it is with the website came from:

http://www.faremeasure.com/airports/Airport-Orlando_Florida.html

Thanks all! :)
I agree, I think MCO-OAK is very likely...especially with the recent growth at FLL. Althoguh it is a transcon, the market is still vital and potentially profitable.

My bets for 2007/2008: MCO-OAK, MCO-SAN, MCO-AUS; FLL-LAS!!!


I highly doubt we'll see FLL/MCO-SAN/SEA/PHX/SJC anytime soon. In the long run, I think we'll see some/most of those route but not right now. FLL/MCO-SEA is the least likely out of all of them. Keep in mind. B6's A320's are have difficultly doing the west bound transcons in the winter due to the way the winds blow. FLL-SEA is much longer than anything you'll see BOS/JFK west (closest being JFK-SAN and BOS-LGB).

Probably, MCO/FLL will see AUS...maybe PHX (much longer shot). B6 definately is looking to get going on ORD, pick up STL, and still connect more of the shorter dots before hitting up the dots further away. My premise is what was already mentioned...the failure of MCO-BUR.

I think B6 will be slow to add another CA to MCO flight after the failure of BUR-MCO.

BUR-MCO is a compleatly different market than OAK-MCO. A nonstop OAK-MCO flight may even hurt SWA's 1 stop service to MCO... it'll be interesting to see the fare war on this one. I know the one complaint I hear from my friends in the bay area is that its pretty rare to find nonstop flights to MCO for a reasonable price (from any of the bay area airports)... but who knows... it'll be interesting to see.

Not to mention the BUR-MCO flight was strictly for the Disney Execs. I will bet MCO-OAK will be added in the near future. But when is up in the air espeially with us rapidly slowing our growth for next year.