GotCalcio4
May 18, 05, 9:00 pm
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2005-05-18-usair-reband_x.htm
An article representing both sides of the fight! ;)
An article representing both sides of the fight! ;)
America West FlightFund (Pre-2005 US Airways merger) - An article for us all
View Full Version : An article for us all
BearX220
May 19, 05, 10:13 am
The brand consultant they quoted wants to call it "East-West Airlines"? Brother... :rolleyes:
ByrdluvsAWACO
May 19, 05, 10:43 am
While US Airways is more well known domestically and globally, it doesn't have a great brand reputation...
Exactly.
Exactly.
Aspirapolvere
May 19, 05, 11:56 am
Continental used to be called "Cancellation" Airlines, so a turnaround can happen.
Eaxctly.
Eaxctly.
murphy
May 19, 05, 12:09 pm
From the article:
"My vote would be rebranding" the merged airline with a new name, said Jack Trout, president of Old Greenwich, Conn.-based Trout & Partners. "Why bring along the baggage? US Airways has got a terrible reputation."
I wonder if Mr Trout could suggest a marketing company capable of taking on the rebranding challenge? Hmm, maybe Trout & Partners!
A campaign for "The NEW Us Airways" would be just as effective (if not more so), and much cheaper.
"My vote would be rebranding" the merged airline with a new name, said Jack Trout, president of Old Greenwich, Conn.-based Trout & Partners. "Why bring along the baggage? US Airways has got a terrible reputation."
I wonder if Mr Trout could suggest a marketing company capable of taking on the rebranding challenge? Hmm, maybe Trout & Partners!
A campaign for "The NEW Us Airways" would be just as effective (if not more so), and much cheaper.
AZ Travels the World
May 19, 05, 12:22 pm
Continental used to be called "Cancellation" Airlines, so a turnaround can happen.
I think that's a good point. Remember the days of "America Worst?" There was a time no so long ago when the airline's reputation was horrible, though from a national perspective, certainly more limited in scope than US's, given the size of the respective companies.
US is a brand with strong familiarity and recognition across North America and some other parts of the world. If this deal is completed and the integration handled appropriately, it can bring about a re-birthing of US of the same magnitude of CO.
I think this is a key point: In branding, awareness and perception are two different things. It is often more practical to change a perception over time via improved performance and some good PR, than it is to start over. Creating awareness of a new brand is a much more expensive proposition. The costs associated with creating an entirely new brand and then gaining the requisite level of national recognition would be ridiculous for US/HP to undertake in the current environment. The overall value associated with the current brand isn't all that bad. The negative perceptions are associated with issues like bad service quality, lost baggage and timliness of operations. Those can be turned around over the course of a year. It's not as though the reputation is unsalvagable, as it might be following some serious safety issues, plane crashes or other problems that the public might consider insurmountable or not worth the risk of giving the company another shot.
While the US reputation is soiled now, people will give them some time to turn things around. And when they do, perceptions will improve, just as they did with CO, and as they have with HP. Assuming they do some things right and this happens, they'll once again have a solid reputation, combined with a well known, long established brand. That is why this route makes much more sense than starting over.
I think that's a good point. Remember the days of "America Worst?" There was a time no so long ago when the airline's reputation was horrible, though from a national perspective, certainly more limited in scope than US's, given the size of the respective companies.
US is a brand with strong familiarity and recognition across North America and some other parts of the world. If this deal is completed and the integration handled appropriately, it can bring about a re-birthing of US of the same magnitude of CO.
I think this is a key point: In branding, awareness and perception are two different things. It is often more practical to change a perception over time via improved performance and some good PR, than it is to start over. Creating awareness of a new brand is a much more expensive proposition. The costs associated with creating an entirely new brand and then gaining the requisite level of national recognition would be ridiculous for US/HP to undertake in the current environment. The overall value associated with the current brand isn't all that bad. The negative perceptions are associated with issues like bad service quality, lost baggage and timliness of operations. Those can be turned around over the course of a year. It's not as though the reputation is unsalvagable, as it might be following some serious safety issues, plane crashes or other problems that the public might consider insurmountable or not worth the risk of giving the company another shot.
While the US reputation is soiled now, people will give them some time to turn things around. And when they do, perceptions will improve, just as they did with CO, and as they have with HP. Assuming they do some things right and this happens, they'll once again have a solid reputation, combined with a well known, long established brand. That is why this route makes much more sense than starting over.
BearX220
May 19, 05, 12:38 pm
Continental used to be called "Cancellation" Airlines, so a turnaround can happen.
Continental accomplished this with a crash tip-to-tail rebranding program; the ONLY aspect of the brand they kept was the name. No more proud birds with golden tails, no more old typography, no more shades-of-beige ex-PeopleExpress jets, etc. Bethune held a gun to his company's head and forced them to repaint everything blue, white and gray on a panic schedule. Will US/HP have the time, money, design sense or commitment to do this? 'Cos those black US airplanes that show up on the network news during service meltdowns have become visual symbols for failure and stupidity.
Continental accomplished this with a crash tip-to-tail rebranding program; the ONLY aspect of the brand they kept was the name. No more proud birds with golden tails, no more old typography, no more shades-of-beige ex-PeopleExpress jets, etc. Bethune held a gun to his company's head and forced them to repaint everything blue, white and gray on a panic schedule. Will US/HP have the time, money, design sense or commitment to do this? 'Cos those black US airplanes that show up on the network news during service meltdowns have become visual symbols for failure and stupidity.