RichardMEL
Feb 28, 02, 8:33 am
Tesna's assistance wishlist
By SID MARRIS
01Mar02
THE Howard Government baulked at a wishlist of taxpayer assistance presented by Tesna during its failed bid to buy Ansett because it believed it would cost the nation more than $1.1 billion.
The wishlist, obtained yesterday by The Australian, reveals a range of administrative, tax and legal concessions sought by Lindsay Fox and Solomon Lew just after John Howard's election win last year.
Mr Fox yesterday accused the Government of punishing Tesna for noisy protests by Ansett workers during last year's election campaign.
But it is understood the Government was alarmed at the costs implied in Tesna's bid for tax concessions.
Furthermore, Tesna's proposed legal changes would have seen the competition watchdog regularly interfering in the aviation market. As a result, the Government only agreed to six of the consortium's 11 demands.
A special government negotiator, former KPMG accountant David Crawford, was appointed to deal with Tesna on a daily basis.
Mr Fox said Tesna's requests to the Government were not a call for money.
"The Government has seen our transaction as ACTU Airlines, and because of that the games played behind the scenes have been quite substantial," he said.
"One thing about Mr Howard, he has a very good memory and a very long memory."
But Transport Minister John Anderson said yesterday his departmental advisers were never told the deal was about to collapse because of problems with airport leases.
"I'd spoken to Lindsay Fox (since December) and he had my telephone numbers, he could always call me. In fact, he did reasonably regularly until late last year, but I don't think that is the issue," Mr Anderson said.
"To suggest we've been inactive is an absolute nonsense."
Government advisers said a press release from Tesna said the deal with Sydney Airports Corporation Limited had been agreed.
They said Mr Crawford was told as late as Monday night that Tesna's problems with Sydney Airport were likely to be resolved. On Tuesday, Tesna nominated wrangles over the lease with Sydney Airport as a major factor in its decision to scrap its bid for Ansett.
The most expensive claim in Tesna's letter, sent to the Prime Minister on November 13, was a special concession allowing airlines to write off the value of assets more quickly, known as accelerated depreciation.
Tesna was told that a concession could be offered only if it was to all airlines including Virgin Blue and Qantas, and not just Ansett II, and would cost $1.1billion.
As a result, Mr Fox and Mr Lew did not press the issue at a meeting with Mr Anderson two weeks later.
Tesna had also asked for relief from withholding tax on aircraft leases and a guarantee of employee entitlements for five years.
As part of a deal to underwrite passenger numbers, the Government was asked to pre-purchase tickets for public servants worth $150 million.
The airline owners also wanted the Government to hand the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission sweeping new powers to reign in any anti-competitive behaviour by Qantas or Virgin.
The changes would allow the ACCC to judge behaviour on its "effect", not just the intention, of actions and allow the watchdog to compel an end to the actions through "cease and desist notices".
http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,3865189,00.html
[This message has been edited by RichardMEL (edited 02-28-2002).]
By SID MARRIS
01Mar02
THE Howard Government baulked at a wishlist of taxpayer assistance presented by Tesna during its failed bid to buy Ansett because it believed it would cost the nation more than $1.1 billion.
The wishlist, obtained yesterday by The Australian, reveals a range of administrative, tax and legal concessions sought by Lindsay Fox and Solomon Lew just after John Howard's election win last year.
Mr Fox yesterday accused the Government of punishing Tesna for noisy protests by Ansett workers during last year's election campaign.
But it is understood the Government was alarmed at the costs implied in Tesna's bid for tax concessions.
Furthermore, Tesna's proposed legal changes would have seen the competition watchdog regularly interfering in the aviation market. As a result, the Government only agreed to six of the consortium's 11 demands.
A special government negotiator, former KPMG accountant David Crawford, was appointed to deal with Tesna on a daily basis.
Mr Fox said Tesna's requests to the Government were not a call for money.
"The Government has seen our transaction as ACTU Airlines, and because of that the games played behind the scenes have been quite substantial," he said.
"One thing about Mr Howard, he has a very good memory and a very long memory."
But Transport Minister John Anderson said yesterday his departmental advisers were never told the deal was about to collapse because of problems with airport leases.
"I'd spoken to Lindsay Fox (since December) and he had my telephone numbers, he could always call me. In fact, he did reasonably regularly until late last year, but I don't think that is the issue," Mr Anderson said.
"To suggest we've been inactive is an absolute nonsense."
Government advisers said a press release from Tesna said the deal with Sydney Airports Corporation Limited had been agreed.
They said Mr Crawford was told as late as Monday night that Tesna's problems with Sydney Airport were likely to be resolved. On Tuesday, Tesna nominated wrangles over the lease with Sydney Airport as a major factor in its decision to scrap its bid for Ansett.
The most expensive claim in Tesna's letter, sent to the Prime Minister on November 13, was a special concession allowing airlines to write off the value of assets more quickly, known as accelerated depreciation.
Tesna was told that a concession could be offered only if it was to all airlines including Virgin Blue and Qantas, and not just Ansett II, and would cost $1.1billion.
As a result, Mr Fox and Mr Lew did not press the issue at a meeting with Mr Anderson two weeks later.
Tesna had also asked for relief from withholding tax on aircraft leases and a guarantee of employee entitlements for five years.
As part of a deal to underwrite passenger numbers, the Government was asked to pre-purchase tickets for public servants worth $150 million.
The airline owners also wanted the Government to hand the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission sweeping new powers to reign in any anti-competitive behaviour by Qantas or Virgin.
The changes would allow the ACCC to judge behaviour on its "effect", not just the intention, of actions and allow the watchdog to compel an end to the actions through "cease and desist notices".
http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,3865189,00.html
[This message has been edited by RichardMEL (edited 02-28-2002).]