Newsstand - Surveillance Cameras Set to Keep Watch in Airliners




wigstheone
Apr 6, 02, 8:05 am
James Pink, a Rochester business executive who frequently flies on JetBlue Airways, says he has no problem with being observed by hidden cameras.

"The safer they make the planes," Mr. Pink said, "the better it will be."

Earlier this week, JetBlue became the first airline to install tiny cameras in a passenger cabin. Most other American airlines are expected to follow in short order.

"The cabin camera surveillance system is the logical next step to protect our customers and crew," said David Neeleman, JetBlue's chief executive.

The hidden cameras will allow pilots to watch passengers on two cockpit screens. "If there was a disturbance back there," said Captain Lanny McAndrew, chief pilot for JetBlue, "they would be able to monitor the situation and land as soon as possible."

But Mitch Dresner, a New York business executive who is also a frequent flier, says the benefit of camera surveillance is not worth the intrusion. "I don't think it will make a difference," Mr. Dresner said. "The pilots have enough to do. It won't stop anybody from getting on the aircraft."

Putting cameras on board aircraft was a recommendation of a committee of airline industry executives and government officials after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. While there is no legal requirement to do so, 19 other airlines have already applied to the Federal Aviation Administration for permission to introduce the surveillance equipment on both domestic and international flights. The F.A.A. refused to say which airlines had applied.

But critics, while agreeing that surveillance cameras may provide added security, want assurances that passenger privacy rights will be protected.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/06/business/06WATC.html


Steve M
Apr 6, 02, 12:45 pm
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by wigstheone:
But critics, while agreeing that surveillance cameras may provide added security, want assurances that passenger privacy rights will be protected.</font>

What I find amazing is how the pilot unions have fought tooth and nail against having cameras in the cockpit (to provide a record of cockpit activity in the event of a crash) becase of privacy concerns. But now it's apparently okay for us passengers to be constantly monitored.

One argument is that in a post-9/11 world, the need for monitoring activities in the cabin is justified. Perhaps, but I say that by the same argument, video recording of all activity in the cockpit is warranted in a post-EgyptAir 990 world. I think that if we had a video of the pilot repeatedly saying "I rely on God" as he flew all of his passengers to their deaths, that it would remove all doubt as to the cause of that incident.

malev1
Apr 7, 02, 12:24 pm
Once again JetBlue leads. This airline is simply amazing! I hear they are working on adding a bunch of new DIRECTV channels and starting a frequent flyer program in a few months.


siliconengineer
Apr 7, 02, 8:38 pm
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by wigstheone:


But critics, while agreeing that surveillance cameras may provide added security, want assurances that passenger privacy rights will be protected.

<A HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/06/business/06WATC.html" TARGET=_blank>

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/06/business/06WATC.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/06/business/06WATC.html</A></font>)[/B][/QUOTE][/url]

Don't know about the merits of having these cameras, but do passengers really expect an airplane cabin to be a private place? ....do even the mile high club folks expect they deserve privacy for their actions?



SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0