India-based Airlines - Air India Strike: IPG Perspective




View Full Version : Air India Strike: IPG Perspective


PVDtoDEL
May 16, 12, 8:22 am
Well, everyone was slamming the IPG over this strike, but I decided to write a piece from their position (I will write a piece from management position next, and hopefully one with ICPA too). Hopefully, my readers are intelligent enough to be able to figure out their opinion after hearing everyone out ;)

Some of the thing they have to say are a lot more complicated than they initially appear...

Here's an excerpt, because the whole thing is 1500 words+:
http://aeroblogger.com/home/blog/air-india-strike-ipg-perspective/
Editorial note: the author does not endorse this perspective, he is simply explaining it for the purpose of public understanding.

As everyone surely is aware by now, the Indian Pilots Guild, Air India’s pre-merger pilot union, is striking right now. What many people do not know is why. Why is the IPG striking?

The mass media was very quick to criticize the IPG. Coming right after a 30,000 crore rupees bailout package was passed, inconveniencing thousands of passengers, and costing Air India 10 or 20 crores a day (not to mention brand damage), this strike was definitely a nuclear option. The IPG pilots not only feel that this strike was justified, they also feel that their perspective and requests are being trivialized.

“There are a lot of legitimate complaints we have. [Minister of Civil Aviation] Ajit Singh has said as much,” said a striking IPG first officer who declined to be named. “Even after saying this, the management and government are doing nothing, and the media, which doesn’t understand the whole story, continues to blast our positions.”

The first complaint that the IPG has concerns Boeing 787 Dreamliner training. The IPG feels that only they should be permitted to fly these state-of-the-art aircraft, ordered by erstwhile Air India. Management feels that the aircraft should be divided on a 1:1 basis between the IPG and the ICPA, erstwhile Indian Airlines’ trade union. The media was quick to criticize this demand, calling the union greedy and selfish. From a layperson’s view, the management seems to make sense – this is a new state-of-the-art aircraft, and all pilots in the merged company should have a chance to fly it.


However, IPG doesn’t see it that way. Air India took delivery of all the new aircraft ordered for Indian Airlines. In addition to taking delivery of these aircraft, Air India also recruited more than enough pilots – in fact, Indian has far more commanders (Captains) than Air India does, because commander upgrades are done within 4 or 5 years, and are time-based instead of requirement-based. Time-based upgrade policy means that no matter what, after a set period of time, the pilot will get upgraded. In comparison, requirement-based policy means that upgrades will only occur if there is requirement for another commander. Air India pays ICPA commanders higher salaries than first officers, at the expense of the company, despite the fact that these commanders are not necessary. With all the aircraft delivered, Indian Airlines has roughly 800 pilots operating 66 aircraft.

In comparison, despite hiring enough pilots to operate all 50 aircraft ordered for erstwhile AI, the IPG only flies 22 aircraft. Since Air India pilots get upgraded to commander at a later stage than their Indian Airlines counterparts, and their contract only allows them to upgrade if there is the necessity for a commander, operating less jets than expected is a severe hit to young IPG pilots’ career progression.

So IPG feels that the management’s decision to let Indian Airlines commanders also fly the 787 is to cut down on salary costs, at the direct expense of IPG members. Since Indian Airlines will produce commanders whether the combined company needs them or not, while erstwhile Air India pilots will not be upgraded unless there are actual aircraft for them to fly, it makes sense to management to send ICPA members to train for the 787.

While some IPG pilots that I’ve communicated with concede that while Air India is losing money, and it does make sense to the management to try to save money, this is not an appropriate way. There are many ways to cut costs that do not affect pilot pay or benefits, and they listed many in a press release. They are very unhappy about it for obvious reasons – they make less money, have less flexibility, and lose other advantages of working for Air India that they thought they had. Not only this, but the IPG claims that management is flouting promises made shortly after the merger took place.

keep reading (http://aeroblogger.com/home/blog/air-india-strike-ipg-perspective/)

Thoughts?


Keyser
May 16, 12, 10:18 pm
(I will write a piece from management position next, and hopefully one with ICPA too). Hopefully, my readers are intelligent enough to be able to figure out their opinion after hearing everyone out ;)

Thoughts?

lets hear the other sides first....

phillystudent
May 17, 12, 6:04 am
To be honest, after reading this piece (which I understand is a single-sided view and thus biased), I'm not so sure about my position on the issue anymore. I can definitely see where IPG is coming from, and it certainly doesn't seem like it is much fun there.

Either way, thanks for writing this (interesting and informative) piece!

(Btw, when I wrote above that the piece is biased, I understand that it's just an op-ed from one perspective - it's nothing against you, just a declaration that I know that it was an op-ed)


SpeedFreak
May 17, 12, 6:37 am
Till such time the induction of twelve B787 aircraft in the fleet is completed, the conversion of Commanders onto B787 will be as per line seniority from B747-400/B777/A310.

Picked this out of your blog. What exactly happens for the remaining 15 ac. They were not going to fly them. Had they conceded them before itself?

PVDtoDEL
May 17, 12, 8:27 am
Till such time the induction of twelve B787 aircraft in the fleet is completed, the conversion of Commanders onto B787 will be as per line seniority from B747-400/B777/A310.

Picked this out of your blog. What exactly happens for the remaining 15 ac. They were not going to fly them. Had they conceded them before itself?

I'm not sure. I'll ask the IPG rep and get back to you..

To be honest, after reading this piece (which I understand is a single-sided view and thus biased), I'm not so sure about my position on the issue anymore. I can definitely see where IPG is coming from, and it certainly doesn't seem like it is much fun there.

Either way, thanks for writing this (interesting and informative) piece!

(Btw, when I wrote above that the piece is biased, I understand that it's just an op-ed from one perspective - it's nothing against you, just a declaration that I know that it was an op-ed)

ICPA piece will come tomorrow or day after, and the good captain who's helping me with the ICPA position has a surprise up his sleeve regarding IPG and 787.

Don't make up your mind so fast ;)

phillystudent
May 17, 12, 9:04 am
ICPA piece will come tomorrow or day after, and the good captain who's helping me with the ICPA position has a surprise up his sleeve regarding IPG and 787.

Don't make up your mind so fast ;)

All I said was that I'm not so sure anymore. :) Can't wait for the next part and the captain's perspective!

PVDtoDEL
May 17, 12, 10:14 am
Till such time the induction of twelve B787 aircraft in the fleet is completed, the conversion of Commanders onto B787 will be as per line seniority from B747-400/B777/A310.

Picked this out of your blog. What exactly happens for the remaining 15 ac. They were not going to fly them. Had they conceded them before itself?

I have clarified with IPG:

All aircraft were to be operated by IPG. The reference to 12 aircraft was talking about which pilots would operate the 787 aircraft - it would be purely seniority based (meaning that most senior commanders become 787 commanders, most senior FOs become 787 FOs)

After the first 12 aircraft are inducted, upgrades would be possible (787/777/747 FOs could become 787 commanders or FOs), purely on the basis of requirement.

SpeedFreak
May 17, 12, 11:36 am
Hmmm, they have so many policies they end up contradicting each other.

PVDtoDEL
May 17, 12, 11:37 am
Hmmm, they have so many policies they end up contradicting each other.

Perhaps another committee should be formed to figure out the impact of creating non-contradictory policies :rolleyes::rolleyes:



SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.