rtalk25
Apr 15, 12, 10:34 am
So the WN schedule has WN to begin flying MKE-SEA, MKE-LAX and MKE-LGA.
Still on FL that have not yet transitioned to WN are:
MKE-MSP
MKE-BOS
MKE-SFO
MKE-DCA
MKE-MSP has DL competition, but it's a short haul route and WN might feel it's a good way to route pax into MSP.
MKE-BOS has no other competition. Maybe WN is waiting to see if B6 adds MKE-BOS. WN might not want to link MKE-BOS when they could link BOS to another WN city, but if nobody else is flying the route, why give it up (assuming it has O&D).
MKE-SFO. Longer route, but no other link to the Bay Area.
MKE-DCA. Interesting because WN might want to fly DCA-MDW. Over at IAD, UA actually doesn't fly IAD-MKE. So maybe there'll be a mix of MDW/MKE to DCA/IAD or some re-arrangement?
WN might be in a situation where it doesn't want to really be big at MKE since the MDW hub is so close, but they have the opportunity to fly to the coasts (LAX, SFO, SEA) and (DCA, LGA, BOS) and actually be important there, because no other airline is hubbed there or is focusing there. F9 has downsized it's MKE presence.
Since there is no other carrier on these routes, and some FL routes, would it seem that WN at MKE will be a focus city -with flights to the hubs as well as key coast cities?
Still on FL that have not yet transitioned to WN are:
MKE-MSP
MKE-BOS
MKE-SFO
MKE-DCA
MKE-MSP has DL competition, but it's a short haul route and WN might feel it's a good way to route pax into MSP.
MKE-BOS has no other competition. Maybe WN is waiting to see if B6 adds MKE-BOS. WN might not want to link MKE-BOS when they could link BOS to another WN city, but if nobody else is flying the route, why give it up (assuming it has O&D).
MKE-SFO. Longer route, but no other link to the Bay Area.
MKE-DCA. Interesting because WN might want to fly DCA-MDW. Over at IAD, UA actually doesn't fly IAD-MKE. So maybe there'll be a mix of MDW/MKE to DCA/IAD or some re-arrangement?
WN might be in a situation where it doesn't want to really be big at MKE since the MDW hub is so close, but they have the opportunity to fly to the coasts (LAX, SFO, SEA) and (DCA, LGA, BOS) and actually be important there, because no other airline is hubbed there or is focusing there. F9 has downsized it's MKE presence.
Since there is no other carrier on these routes, and some FL routes, would it seem that WN at MKE will be a focus city -with flights to the hubs as well as key coast cities?