peersteve
Mar 14, 12, 4:58 pm
From Slate.....
The upset author/mother writes:
"Previously, children between the ages of 8 and 13 could travel as unaccompanied minors in precisely the way I’ve described: One adult handed them off to an attendant at one end, with paperwork designating exactly who was to pick them up at the other end. As of last November, however, a child must be between the ages of 13 and 15 to ride the train under these terms."
Her full article at:
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/family/2012/02/unaccompanied_minors_why_can_t_kids_travel_alone_o n_amtrak_.single.html
The upset author/mother writes:
"Previously, children between the ages of 8 and 13 could travel as unaccompanied minors in precisely the way I’ve described: One adult handed them off to an attendant at one end, with paperwork designating exactly who was to pick them up at the other end. As of last November, however, a child must be between the ages of 13 and 15 to ride the train under these terms."
Her full article at:
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/family/2012/02/unaccompanied_minors_why_can_t_kids_travel_alone_o n_amtrak_.single.html