Amtrak Guest Rewards - sleeper rewards direct trains only?




jftino
Jan 28, 12, 7:18 am
Hi all. I was On the phone with AGR last night and when I went to redeem my points for a chi-sea trip, I was informed that they are only to allow point redemptions for the most direct train (the builder in this case). I have never saw this mentioned anywhere that I recall. Has anyone else heard this? Or was it just a misinformed rep?


Ispolkom
Jan 28, 12, 9:20 am
Misinformed agent. I've gotten the same line occasionally. Just call back another time and get another agent.

EDIT: Of course, if your desired itinerary doesn't appear on amtrak.com, you'll have more difficulty booking it.

darben
Jan 28, 12, 9:59 am
Here is how I book AGR

First pretend you are making a paid booking. If the choice you want shows up as a paid booking then you are good to go
If you are looking at the California Zephyr and then coast starlight it is the second option when I checked. It should also be the agents second option.

Call back and talk to another agent suggested wording is "I see I have the option of booking via LA on the Zephyr and then the Coast Starlight please book me into a (BEDROOM or roomette).

If agent refuses ask for supervisor

Train 3 is not a good choice as the delays on it give you a 20-30 % chance of missing your connection. A day in LA might be nice but weigh that against having no room for your LA - SEA trip

Check delays here
http://www.amtrakdelays.onlineschedulingsoftware.com/

In addition there are service alerts out for the coast starlight train 14 found here
http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename=am%2FLayout&cid=1237608335997

I do not know if this affects your ability to book the itinerary you want

ABOVE ALL BE NICE


trainman74
Jan 28, 12, 2:22 pm
Call back and talk to another agent suggested wording is "I see I have the option of booking via LA on the Zephyr and then the Coast Starlight please book me into a (BEDROOM or roomette)."

I think if you ask for "via LA on the Zephyr," that will confuse the agent a bit. :D

I usually just use train numbers when I'm talking to Amtrak or AGR agents so that there's (hopefully) no misinterpretation.

I just yesterday redeemed for a NYP-LAX trip in June; the agent first suggested the Lake Shore Limited and the Southwest Chief, but I said, "Actually, I wanted train 49 connecting to train 421." No problem, even though it's not the quickest route. There were in fact 15 possible itineraries showing on Amtrak.com, and I should have been able to suggest, and be booked on, any of them.

jftino
Jan 28, 12, 3:22 pm
Thanks everyone. I did call back and the other agent was going to book it, but due to us changing trains on a blackout day we weren't able to. I didn't know about that requirement either, just that the trip couldn't initiate on a blackout day. Oh well. Back to the drawing board it seems.

darben
Jan 28, 12, 6:40 pm
Thanks everyone. I did call back and the other agent was going to book it, but due to us changing trains on a blackout day we weren't able to. I didn't know about that requirement either, just that the trip couldn't initiate on a blackout day. Oh well. Back to the drawing board it seems.

What are you trying to do?

jb64
Jan 29, 12, 12:05 pm
Train 3 is not a good choice as the delays on it give you a 20-30 % chance of missing your connection. A day in LA might be nice but weigh that against having no room for your LA - SEA trip

Check delays here
http://www.amtrakdelays.onlineschedulingsoftware.com/

In addition there are service alerts out for the coast starlight train 14 found here
http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename=am%2FLayout&cid=1237608335997

I do not know if this affects your ability to book the itinerary you want

ABOVE ALL BE NICE

When I look up train 3 for the past 4 weeks, the average on time performance is 22 minutes EARLY. It appears that only 3 days in the last month did it not arrive early and only one of those days was late enough to miss the Coast Starlight.

And, California Zephyr doesn't go to LA.

jftino
Jan 29, 12, 12:23 pm
Was hoping to leave chi on Xmas and take the SW chief to LA then up the starlight. Since we'd change trains on the 27th and that's part of the blackout period, it seems it's a no go.

Thanks everyone. I did call back and the other agent was going to book it, but due to us changing trains on a blackout day we weren't able to. I didn't know about that requirement either, just that the trip couldn't initiate on a blackout day. Oh well. Back to the drawing board it seems.

What are you trying to do?

darben
Jan 29, 12, 1:30 pm
I actually think your proposed travel is legal. Here is the T&C's for blackout dates.

I have bolded the part I think pertinent. Your travel originates on Dec 25. The transfer that continues your travel is within the blackout period.

WHAT DO OTHERS THINK of the wording?

Personally I would PM the Amtrak insider and ask.

For the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013 travel origination on Redemption awards may not occur on the following dates/times: January 2, 2012; February 17, 2012; February 20, 2012; April 5–6, 2012; April 9, 2012; May 25, 2012; August 31, 2012; September 3, 2012; October 5, 2012; November 20–21, 2012; November 24–26, 2012; December 20–23, 2012; December 26–30, 2012; January 2, 2013; February 15, 2013; February 18, 2013; March 28–29, 2013; April 1, 2013; May 24, 2013; August 30, 2013, September 2, 2013; October 11, 2013; November 26–27, 2013; November 30, 2013; December 1, 2013; December 20–22, 2013 and December 28–29, 2013 and January 3–5, 2014.

if you cannot get what you originally wanted then Can you do it in reverse leaving lax on Dec 24 and Seattle to chi on the 25th

or leave Seattle on Dec 31 and transfer to the zephyr for chi on New years day?

alanh
Jan 29, 12, 2:09 pm
Amtrak has taken the position that you may not book a train segment that begins on a blackout date, regardless of whatever other segments you have in your itinerary. This keeps you from booking a throwaway segment to get around the blackout. Unlike the airlines, Amtrak doesn't really have a way to see if you missed a previous segment so they can't enforce it by cancelling the rest of your segments.

darben
Jan 29, 12, 2:23 pm
you are always informative

jftino
Jan 29, 12, 5:39 pm
Thanks Alan. That makes sense. I had wondered about that. Not that it helps with my trip planning but at least I understand the reasoning behind it now.

amamba
Jan 30, 12, 4:20 pm
Here is how I book AGR

Train 3 is not a good choice as the delays on it give you a 20-30 % chance of missing your connection. A day in LA might be nice but weigh that against having no room for your LA - SEA trip.



Darben, where are you getting the info about the SWC being so late 20-30% of the time to miss the connection with the CS? While there is theoretically only a 2 hourish connection time, my understanding is that this is one of the better routes for time keeping. There is a LOT of padding in the schedule. Barring a derailment or some sort of weather related catastrophe, chances are pretty good at making the connection the SWC - CS connection in LAX.

darben
Jan 30, 12, 5:41 pm
I consider anything over one hour delay unacceptable for this connection as there are no other alternatives for someone if they miss the connection. I have been unlucky enough to miss a guaranteed connection. Train left 5 minutes after our arrival in Washington. Not enough time to make connection Amtrak put us up overnight in Washington at their expense and We enjoyed Washington the next day as it was kite flying day and the cherry blossoms were out. Problem was no room availability the next day stuck in coach WAS - NOL. Not the best experience. I included a link so OP could check for himself, but on a long distance trip without recourse I tend to take a very conservative approach to connections. Those who feel safe cutting things close may do so.
The Status for train 3 arriving into LAX
2012-01-30: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:02 am Delay: -13 minutes
2012-01-29: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:08 am Delay: -67 minutes
2012-01-28: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:05 am Delay: -70 minutes
2012-01-27: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:08 am Delay: -7 minutes
2012-01-26: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:11 am Delay: -4 minutes
2012-01-25: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:28 am Delay: -47 minutes
2012-01-24: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:18 am Delay: -57 minutes
2012-01-23: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 12:15 pm Delay: + 240 minutes
2012-01-22: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:34 am Delay: -41 minutes
2012-01-21: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:09 am Delay: -66 minutes
2012-01-20: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:25 am Delay: -50 minutes
2012-01-19: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:20 am Delay: 5 minutes
2012-01-18: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 9:00 am Delay: 45 minutes
2012-01-17: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:25 am Delay: 10 minutes
2012-01-16: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:03 am Delay: -12 minutes
2012-01-15: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:08 am Delay: -67 minutes
2012-01-14: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:52 am Delay: 37 minutes
2012-01-13: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:26 am Delay: -49 minutes
2012-01-12: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:05 am Delay: -10 minutes
2012-01-11: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:08 am Delay: -7 minutes
012-01-10: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:30 am Delay: -45 minutes
2012-01-09: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:27 am Delay: -48 minutes
2012-01-08: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:16 am Delay: -59 minutes
2012-01-07: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:06 am Delay: -69 minutes
2012-01-06: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:56 am Delay: -19 minutes
2012-01-05: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:27 am Delay: -48 minutes
2012-01-04: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 7:30 am Delay: -45 minutes

2012-01-03: Scheduled: 8:15 am Actual: 8:03 am Delay: -12 minutes

amamba
Jan 30, 12, 7:03 pm
So yeah, out of the dates you posted, a connection would have been missed once. That is not 20-30%. I just think we should try to be realistic. Yes, a missed connection would suck. But the SWC-CS connection is generally perceived by most to be a pretty safe connection.

Don't forget that when the train comes in late, you can make the connection with just 15 minutes, unlike on a plane. And amtrak might hold the train for 5-10 minutes, or as is common on the SWC, they will detrain connecting pax early and bus them to meet the CS.

chrismoose
Jan 31, 12, 3:31 am
So yeah, out of the dates you posted, a connection would have been missed once. That is not 20-30%. I just think we should try to be realistic. Yes, a missed connection would suck. But the SWC-CS connection is generally perceived by most to be a pretty safe connection.

Don't forget that when the train comes in late, you can make the connection with just 15 minutes, unlike on a plane. And amtrak might hold the train for 5-10 minutes, or as is common on the SWC, they will detrain connecting pax early and bus them to meet the CS.

I've failed to make the SWC-CS connection, but as I was only going to San Fran I got bussed to Bakersfield and put on the San Joaquins - think I would rather have had a day in LA!

jftino
Jan 31, 12, 4:00 pm
Personally I wouldn't mind a day in LA to break the trip up some. Alas Tis not possible with a reward redemption.

jftino
Feb 7, 12, 9:04 am
Just to follow up, I had no trouble booking the routing I wanted when I called this morning. Nol-chi-lax-sea.

Paddlenpedal
Feb 7, 12, 11:18 am
Just to follow up, I had no trouble booking the routing I wanted when I called this morning. Nol-chi-lax-sea.

That would be a great trip! We were looking at doing something similar, but the cost of airfare at both ends for us would be more than I'm willing to part with. Ended up booking OKC-FTW-SAS-NOL, then NOL-CHI-FTW-OKC. Picked up the tickets this morning, looking forward to it! Hope you have a great trip! ^

jbalmuth
Feb 8, 12, 11:11 am
Just to follow up, I had no trouble booking the routing I wanted when I called this morning. Nol-chi-lax-sea.


Was this booked as one award ---- i.e. 4.5 days of continuous Amtrak travel, with just two short scheduled layover stops (2 hours in L.A., 6 hours in Chicago)? If so, it'll be total immersion. :eek: Wow! :)

Ispolkom
Feb 8, 12, 3:23 pm
Yes, it's all one go, since Amtrak generally doesn't allow overnight stopovers on award travel. By the time he's finished, jftino should have the dining car menu pretty much memorized.

My problem is on the third day remembering what my room number is on this train, vs. the previous two.

jftino
Feb 8, 12, 8:47 pm
Yes it was. Then 2 days in Seattle and another 4 going sea - Austin on some odd routing that comes up when you type those locations in. It was so relaxing being on the train last time for us. Hopefully it is again.

trainman74
Feb 9, 12, 1:27 pm
By the time he's finished, jftino should have the dining car menu pretty much memorized.

The good news is that each train's menus are actually slightly different from each other (and the "specials" may be different as well). In 2002, I did a trip LAX-EMY (long stopover)-PDX-CHI (long stopover)-LAX, and there was only one nationwide menu at that point.

jftino
Feb 9, 12, 6:32 pm
Yes, it's all one go, since Amtrak generally doesn't allow overnight stopovers on award travel. By the time he's finished, jftino should have the dining car menu pretty much memorized.

My problem is on the third day remembering what my room number is on this train, vs. the previous two.

Luckily we have the same room For The whole trip. Also, with the PPC available for dinner on the starlight, that will add some variety to the meals... I hope!



SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.