Bob7032
Jan 11, 12, 9:44 pm
There are a couple of other threads on this topic with other carriers, but my issue has been with ANA. So I thought I would add a topic here.
For those that do not know, Obstructive Sleep Apnea is a serious issue. A US football fan may recall Reggie White, from the Green Bay Packers and the Philadelphia Eagles, who died at age 40 due to OSA. I too have this affliction, due to the structure of my throat, which can cause me to stop breathing in my sleep.
Luckily, OSA is easily treated using a CPAP or BiPAP device. These are prescribed by Physicians who specialize in sleep disorders. They are extremely effective.
In the past two years, CPAP and BiPAP devices have been given certifications for use on aircraft, and consume low power to be used safely with aircraft power ports.
So I a traveling in F class on an LAX-NRT flight, and I see that NH does allow use of CPAP devices http://www.ana.co.jp/share/assist_eng/13.html#06. But my device is not listed, and, in fact, none of the devices listed are currently sold. A couple are even made by companies that non longer exist.
So, being a good citizen, I call ANA to ask about usage. Big big mistake. I give them the machine make/model, and they promise to get back to me. They get back and say, sorry, you cannot use this as it is rated at 100 watts, and they only allow up to 75 watts. Not correct I counter. The machine is clearly rated at 60 watts, and I get I letter from the manufacturer stating as such. Next they claim that the machine is not certified for airline use. Again, I counter that the machine clearly has been tested and rated for airline use. Their final argument is that they must personally test each device that they clear, but they will not do so unless enough customers complain.
By the way, this is all done via ANA's US reps, who hide shamelessly behind the "bosses in Tokyo". No means of communicating with those bosses is offered. I even had my MD call them, but they simply refused to admit this is a problem.
So I am left to assume that ANA does not want my paid premium class business. I hope someone at ANA takes the trouble to send this on to the higher-ups in Tokyo. Suffice it to say, there is a fair chunk of my business that will not be headed their way.
For those that do not know, Obstructive Sleep Apnea is a serious issue. A US football fan may recall Reggie White, from the Green Bay Packers and the Philadelphia Eagles, who died at age 40 due to OSA. I too have this affliction, due to the structure of my throat, which can cause me to stop breathing in my sleep.
Luckily, OSA is easily treated using a CPAP or BiPAP device. These are prescribed by Physicians who specialize in sleep disorders. They are extremely effective.
In the past two years, CPAP and BiPAP devices have been given certifications for use on aircraft, and consume low power to be used safely with aircraft power ports.
So I a traveling in F class on an LAX-NRT flight, and I see that NH does allow use of CPAP devices http://www.ana.co.jp/share/assist_eng/13.html#06. But my device is not listed, and, in fact, none of the devices listed are currently sold. A couple are even made by companies that non longer exist.
So, being a good citizen, I call ANA to ask about usage. Big big mistake. I give them the machine make/model, and they promise to get back to me. They get back and say, sorry, you cannot use this as it is rated at 100 watts, and they only allow up to 75 watts. Not correct I counter. The machine is clearly rated at 60 watts, and I get I letter from the manufacturer stating as such. Next they claim that the machine is not certified for airline use. Again, I counter that the machine clearly has been tested and rated for airline use. Their final argument is that they must personally test each device that they clear, but they will not do so unless enough customers complain.
By the way, this is all done via ANA's US reps, who hide shamelessly behind the "bosses in Tokyo". No means of communicating with those bosses is offered. I even had my MD call them, but they simply refused to admit this is a problem.
So I am left to assume that ANA does not want my paid premium class business. I hope someone at ANA takes the trouble to send this on to the higher-ups in Tokyo. Suffice it to say, there is a fair chunk of my business that will not be headed their way.