jerseyfinn
Jul 1, 04, 8:01 pm
Today's Wall Street Journal has a front page article focusing on Ryan Air which is very interesting. Ryan is one of Europe's leading discount airlines and has posted double digit margins for 7 years, but posts its first quarterly loss in 13 years as even the discounter market tightens up.
The article goes on to look at how Ryan operates from a cost-centric basis. There are absolutely no ticket refunds of any kind on Ryan, even for a canceled flight. "What part of ' no refund' don't you understand?" the chief CEO is quoted as saying. Likewise Ryan charges very high excess baggage fees " . . . stop bringing so much old rubbish with you" the CEO says ( sounds like fights my wife and I have when we travel). New planes lack window shades ( which delay the staff who must prepare for takeoff ) and the new seats do not recline at all to cut down mechanical parts and repair/maintainance.
It gets me thinking about what I really want in an airline. Now obviously one wants inexpensive tickets and some degree of service. But I'm not so sure that I want to fly in a seat I can't recline or have a window that I can't keep the sun out of my eyes. Then again, dangle a really cheap airfare in front of me, and I might ponder it.
I think that my point is that there is no one way or one single business model to define what constitutes a "perfect" airline. Certainly cost management is a huge factor in pricing and there is indeed a point at which one can give up some service for real savings. But I'm not so sure that I'd want to book a flight on an airline which cancels a flight and offers me nothing in return.
I guess that there's something to be said for reliability and convention. US might have some warts on it, but for me, I'm glad I fly US and receive at least some definitive level of service which meets my expectations if not always my pocketbook. I'm a little more thankful for US and the conventional carriers after reading this article.
Barry
The article goes on to look at how Ryan operates from a cost-centric basis. There are absolutely no ticket refunds of any kind on Ryan, even for a canceled flight. "What part of ' no refund' don't you understand?" the chief CEO is quoted as saying. Likewise Ryan charges very high excess baggage fees " . . . stop bringing so much old rubbish with you" the CEO says ( sounds like fights my wife and I have when we travel). New planes lack window shades ( which delay the staff who must prepare for takeoff ) and the new seats do not recline at all to cut down mechanical parts and repair/maintainance.
It gets me thinking about what I really want in an airline. Now obviously one wants inexpensive tickets and some degree of service. But I'm not so sure that I want to fly in a seat I can't recline or have a window that I can't keep the sun out of my eyes. Then again, dangle a really cheap airfare in front of me, and I might ponder it.
I think that my point is that there is no one way or one single business model to define what constitutes a "perfect" airline. Certainly cost management is a huge factor in pricing and there is indeed a point at which one can give up some service for real savings. But I'm not so sure that I'd want to book a flight on an airline which cancels a flight and offers me nothing in return.
I guess that there's something to be said for reliability and convention. US might have some warts on it, but for me, I'm glad I fly US and receive at least some definitive level of service which meets my expectations if not always my pocketbook. I'm a little more thankful for US and the conventional carriers after reading this article.
Barry