Class Action Suit alleges AA wrongly charged for checked bags
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From and of Boston.
Posts: 4,973
Class Action Suit alleges AA wrongly charged for checked bags
As reported by UniversalHub.com, a Harvard B-School professor named Max Bazerman has filed suit asking for a class action against AA, alleging that AA made him and many others pay for checked bags after promising that the bags could be checked without charge. The suit claims that "AA systematically breached the Contract because it required certain passengers to pay to check certain bags."
The lawsuit is 25 pages long, and it's got lots of detail. Prof Bazerman says that he got charged for checked bags on flights, even though he had a first-class ticket, was AA Platinum and OW Sapphire (via BA).
The full suit is here, and below are a couple of excerpts:
The lawsuit is 25 pages long, and it's got lots of detail. Prof Bazerman says that he got charged for checked bags on flights, even though he had a first-class ticket, was AA Platinum and OW Sapphire (via BA).
The full suit is here, and below are a couple of excerpts:
In the Contract, AA repeatedly promised Mr. Bazerman that AA would transport his first and second checked bags for no extra charge. Specifically, the e-ticket confirmation email (memorializing the ticket purchase, as described further in paragraph 45) which AA sent to Mr. Bazerman expressly stated that Mr. Bazerman and his companion would each incur a fee of “USD0.00” for their respective first checked bags.
Additionally, both at the time of booking and at the time of travel, Mr. Bazerman had “Platinum” frequent flyer status with AA. The Domestic Terms promise Platinum members that AA will transport their first and second checked bags for no additional charge. The Domestic Terms also promise Platinum members that these checked benefits extend to companion passengers travelling on the same reservation. On information and belief, AA.COM presented substantially the same information to Mr. Bazerman before he purchased the ticket.
Mr. Bazerman also had oneworld Sapphire status because, both at the time of booking and at the time of travel, Mr. Bazerman held British Airways “Silver” status, which qualifies him for oneworld Sapphire status. Matching the promises AA makes as to members with Platinum status, the Domestic Terms promise oneworld Sapphire members that AA will transport their first and second checked bags for no additional charge. On information and belief, AA.COM also presented substantially the same information to Mr. Bazerman before he purchased the ticket. As with Mr. Bazerman’s Platinum status, AA knew that Mr. Bazerman had oneworld Sapphire status. Mr. Bazerman specifically demonstrated his qualification for oneworld Sapphire status to AA both by telephone and again in person when he checked in at the airport in Phoenix.
Additionally, both at the time of booking and at the time of travel, Mr. Bazerman had “Platinum” frequent flyer status with AA. The Domestic Terms promise Platinum members that AA will transport their first and second checked bags for no additional charge. The Domestic Terms also promise Platinum members that these checked benefits extend to companion passengers travelling on the same reservation. On information and belief, AA.COM presented substantially the same information to Mr. Bazerman before he purchased the ticket.
Mr. Bazerman also had oneworld Sapphire status because, both at the time of booking and at the time of travel, Mr. Bazerman held British Airways “Silver” status, which qualifies him for oneworld Sapphire status. Matching the promises AA makes as to members with Platinum status, the Domestic Terms promise oneworld Sapphire members that AA will transport their first and second checked bags for no additional charge. On information and belief, AA.COM also presented substantially the same information to Mr. Bazerman before he purchased the ticket. As with Mr. Bazerman’s Platinum status, AA knew that Mr. Bazerman had oneworld Sapphire status. Mr. Bazerman specifically demonstrated his qualification for oneworld Sapphire status to AA both by telephone and again in person when he checked in at the airport in Phoenix.
Last edited by wideman; Jul 15, 2017 at 11:51 am Reason: fix typo
#3
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Indeed!
The introduction says
Interesting. And, will they certify as a class action lawsuit?
The introduction says
"1. This case is about American Airlines, Inc.’s (“AA”) systematic failure to honor the contracts it enters into with its passengers. AA’s passenger contracts include promises that specified passengers are permitted to check a first, second, and/or third bag for no additional charge. These passengers include “elite” members of certain frequent flyer programs and those who purchase certain types of tickets, such as business class or first class. AA contracts also routinely promise certain other passengers that they are permitted to check their first bag for no additional charge. Yet, AA systematically required these passengers to pay to check bags that AA had promised to transport at no additional charge, and thus breached its contract with affected passengers."
#4
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
I'm confused. If he was a plat flying from BOS-PHX, why would they charge him?
And if there is a class, its a class of people who deal with agents who makes mistakes.
And if there is a class, its a class of people who deal with agents who makes mistakes.
#5
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,767
I can't be bothered to read 25 pages explaining why he's made a class action drama out of it.
#6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
I just skimmed it but looks like he bought a coach ticket in 2016 for him and his wife. He's plat so they shouldn't have charged for checking two bags but they did. Plus he's seen reports of this happening to others on twitter. I'm all for passenger rights but ....
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
The DOT can enforce passenger rights. The FTC can prohibit deceptive and misleading practices. After that, it's the courts. At least Edelman is willing to do the work , instead of just whining about it.
#9
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,431
They claim:
"However, AA failed to honor its checked bag promises in the standardized software system that AA uses to determine whether passengers must pay for checked bags when they check in at the airport. Because this standardized software, AA’s Passenger Service System (“PSS”), required passengers to pay for checked bags that AA promised it would transport for no additional charge, AA systematically breached its contracts with passengers."
Could this possibly have any basis in fact?
"However, AA failed to honor its checked bag promises in the standardized software system that AA uses to determine whether passengers must pay for checked bags when they check in at the airport. Because this standardized software, AA’s Passenger Service System (“PSS”), required passengers to pay for checked bags that AA promised it would transport for no additional charge, AA systematically breached its contracts with passengers."
Could this possibly have any basis in fact?
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From and of Boston.
Posts: 4,973
The guy filing the suit, Max Bazerman, has written or edited 20 books, is Co-Director of the Center for Public Leadership at Harvard's Kennedy School, has an honorary doctorate from the University of London, was named as one of the "100 Most Influential in Business Ethics" by Ethisphere, and has won a bunch of teaching awards. Seems pretty solid to me.
So what conclusions did you draw? (Unless you were referring to Ben Edelman, who, as far as I know, has nothing to do with this lawsuit. Not sure why a few previous posters brought Edelman into the discussion.)
#11
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,431
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not here; there!
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 29,573
They claim:
"However, AA failed to honor its checked bag promises in the standardized software system that AA uses to determine whether passengers must pay for checked bags when they check in at the airport. Because this standardized software, AA’s Passenger Service System (“PSS”), required passengers to pay for checked bags that AA promised it would transport for no additional charge, AA systematically breached its contracts with passengers."
Could this possibly have any basis in fact?
"However, AA failed to honor its checked bag promises in the standardized software system that AA uses to determine whether passengers must pay for checked bags when they check in at the airport. Because this standardized software, AA’s Passenger Service System (“PSS”), required passengers to pay for checked bags that AA promised it would transport for no additional charge, AA systematically breached its contracts with passengers."
Could this possibly have any basis in fact?
So yes, I think it is -- or at least was -- possible for an airline's computer to be improperly programmed re: checked-baggage allowances.
#15
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
Alas, why either of them could figure out why they think this is worth attaching his name to ...surely there must be something else that has more meat to it.
If the class is one who have been the victims of inadvertent mistakes by those in a customer facing role ... that's a big class!
If the class is one who have been the victims of inadvertent mistakes by those in a customer facing role ... that's a big class!