Flying via JFK vs MIA
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thatcham, UK
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 470
Flying via JFK vs MIA
if I want to fly LHR to GRU, am I better doing it via MIA or JFK?
I flew LHR-MIA-GRU earlier this year and it was ok, but out of four flights I had two plane changes to 777-200 pre-refurbs and the ePassport system took ages even with ESTA in place.
So is JFK easier than MIA?
If I wanted to leave bags at JFK and head into the city, where can I do that?
Considering arriving JFK at 7am from GRU and leaving at 9/10pm to LHR, so could have a full day in New York.
Thanks!!
(And yes it's for BA Tier Points that I want to fly 4 legs rather than 2)
I flew LHR-MIA-GRU earlier this year and it was ok, but out of four flights I had two plane changes to 777-200 pre-refurbs and the ePassport system took ages even with ESTA in place.
So is JFK easier than MIA?
If I wanted to leave bags at JFK and head into the city, where can I do that?
Considering arriving JFK at 7am from GRU and leaving at 9/10pm to LHR, so could have a full day in New York.
Thanks!!
(And yes it's for BA Tier Points that I want to fly 4 legs rather than 2)
#3
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Matre-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
There is baggage storage at JFK, and immigration and customs is less shambolic than MIA.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...struction.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...struction.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...struction.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...struction.html
#5
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 146
Depends on your preferences. I am a fan of the JFK routing over MIA, because I like the longer leg on the overnight (and, for me, more time on international equipment, since I connect to a short domestic hop). I can sleep better GRU-JFK than GRU-MIA. A colleague prefers to split the legs at least a little more evenly/reduce length of any one leg. I also personally disliked the early morning MIA arrival (sometimes prior to the opening of security for readmission airside), though it has been a long while since I took that routing and the timing may have changed. Of course, YMMV (literally and figuratively).
Last edited by brie; Feb 6, 2016 at 11:32 am Reason: clarify
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Depends on your preferences. I am a fan of the JFK routing over MIA, because I like the longer leg on the overnight (and, for me, more time on international equipment, since I connect to a short domestic hop). I can sleep better GRU-JFK than GRU-MIA. A colleague prefers to split the legs at least a little more evenly/reduce length of any one leg. I also personally disliked the early morning MIA arrival (sometimes prior to the opening of security for readmission airside), though it has been a long while since I took that routing and the timing may have changed. Of course, YMMV (literally and figuratively).
#7
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NCL
Programs: UA 1MM/*G. DL Gold for one more year.
Posts: 5,305
I always choose the outbound via JFK, because it has the shortest total travel duration. Leaving London after 5 PM and arriving in So Paulo the next morning doesn't feel too absurd compared to the non-stop options. Never had a problem clearing immigration with some lounge time to spare. Also, it's the same aircraft continuing, so if you pay for WiFi it's valid throughout . Returning, the day flight out of GRU via MIA works nicely (although it sometimes connects with an old-configuration 777).
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thatcham, UK
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 470
Thoughts on the following set of flights?
AA 107 LHR-JFK
AA 951 JFK-GRU
AA 950 GRU-JFK
AA 100 JFK-LHR
I believe they are all 777-300 flights, so should have new style Biz Class?
AA 107 LHR-JFK
AA 951 JFK-GRU
AA 950 GRU-JFK
AA 100 JFK-LHR
I believe they are all 777-300 flights, so should have new style Biz Class?
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thatcham, UK
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 470
#11
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX - AUS
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott
Posts: 1,622
Unless you're planning to spend time in NYC, I highly recommend connecting in MIA over JFK. I have connected in both, and I find MIA immigration process to be much shorter than JFK (JFK took over an hour just to go through passport control). At JFK you may have to take the AirTrain to your next flight (which involves a long walk with confusing signage); no train required at MIA. And, MIA is much less likely to be impacted with weather delays than JFK.
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thatcham, UK
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 470
On the way out, I intend to pass straight through.
2hr layover in JFK on outbound and 12hr layover on inbound.
I was intending to use the 12hrs on the way back, to head down town to grab a bit of shopping
2hr layover in JFK on outbound and 12hr layover on inbound.
I was intending to use the 12hrs on the way back, to head down town to grab a bit of shopping
#13
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: D/FW, TX
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 427
That's what I would do. I've never been able to make much of a long layover at MIA...