Community
Wiki Posts
Search

USAirways Merger Rumors Resurfacing...

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2009, 12:22 pm
  #121  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA GLD (1MM), DL GLD, Marriott Plat, RCL D+, X Elite
Posts: 3,229
There's a limited amount of connectivity over RDU to/from LHR. I doubt its enough to matter, but it's there. Truth told, I don't remember a flight from DCA to RDU that an announcement hasn't been made regarding the gate to London for connecting passengers. And on my last return from RDU to DCA, there was a gentleman beside me who had flown in from LHR.

There is quite a bit of corporate traffic on that flight. Glaxo is the biggest, which I've already seen mentioned. Quite a few international businesses are located adjacent to RDU in the Research Triangle Park. I might be wrong, but I think that may play at least some role in why RDU has almost the same amount of O&D traffic as CLT from a much smaller population base....along with the presence of WN which gins up some traffic on its own.
MJonTravel is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 1:04 pm
  #122  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Programs: A: PP, LTG/1.5M | UA: SLV | Bonvoy LTTi | IHG PLT| Avis PC | Nat'l Emerald Club EE
Posts: 1,067
An unscientific observation...

This morning on the ramp at DEN, I spotted something very odd...a 737 with an America West logo on the tail. It also had "U.S. Airways" painted along the top of the forward end of fuselage...now that was the "interim" scheme during the merger...how long ago was that?

Now maybe they just pulled that frame back into service from storage, but still...it's all US Air now and they didn't take the time to get it right...

Yeah...AA needs to be associated with an outfit like that...better they should start from scratch and build an operation to compete where they really need the market share. US will collapse of its own accord...

cheers!
AAir_head is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 1:15 pm
  #123  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: Grounded
Posts: 669
Originally Posted by AAir_head
An unscientific observation...

This morning on the ramp at DEN, I spotted something very odd...a 737 with an America West logo on the tail. It also had "U.S. Airways" painted along the top of the forward end of fuselage...now that was the "interim" scheme during the merger...how long ago was that?

Now maybe they just pulled that frame back into service from storage, but still...it's all US Air now and they didn't take the time to get it right...

Yeah...AA needs to be associated with an outfit like that...better they should start from scratch and build an operation to compete where they really need the market share. US will collapse of its own accord...

cheers!
That might have been one of their celebratory legacy liveries. IIRC they have 4 of those planes, half decked out like one of their original 4 airlines and the rest in new US livery.

It was done post-US/HP merger, but it's primarily celebratory and doesn't cost them anything to keep, so I can't see why they would want to change it.

It's actually pretty cool, and one of the nicer touches of US to look back at their past like that. Too bad their present is too messy.

Last edited by MrPink; Nov 22, 2009 at 1:21 pm
MrPink is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 1:21 pm
  #124  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Originally Posted by MrPink
That might have been one of their celebratory legacy liveries. IIRC they have 4 of those planes, half decked out like one of their original 4 airlines and the rest in new US livery.

It was done post-US/HP merger, but it's primarily celebratory and doesn't cost them anything, so I can't see why they would want to change it.
Yeah, I think it was one of these hokey our history and heritage ideas. Also, probably to try to develop some love between USAir and America West flight personnel, which doesn't seem like it has worked very well. I did a LAS/JFK USAir flight awhile back and the F FA acted like USAir FAs were the anti-christ. When I asked her is she was former USAir or America West she said that she was not "one of them" (refering to USAir FAs).
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 1:23 pm
  #125  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,950
Originally Posted by AAir_head
An unscientific observation...

This morning on the ramp at DEN, I spotted something very odd...a 737 with an America West logo on the tail. It also had "U.S. Airways" painted along the top of the forward end of fuselage...now that was the "interim" scheme during the merger...how long ago was that?
Was it this plane? US maintains one aircraft with a "heritage livery" from each of the previous companies.

Now maybe they just pulled that frame back into service from storage, but still...it's all US Air now and they didn't take the time to get it right...

Yeah...AA needs to be associated with an outfit like that...better they should start from scratch and build an operation to compete where they really need the market share. US will collapse of its own accord...

cheers!
There are plenty of good reasons for AA not to be associated with US, but I think this is actually a nice touch.
ashill is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 3:16 pm
  #126  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington DC Metro Area
Programs: A: PP, LTG/1.5M | UA: SLV | Bonvoy LTTi | IHG PLT| Avis PC | Nat'l Emerald Club EE
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted by ashill
Was it this plane? US maintains one aircraft with a "heritage livery" from each of the previous companies.
Definitely not the one on airliners.net; I didn't get a long look at it (or the tail #), but I don't think it was one of the other heritage liveries either--the tail was plain white with that sort-of rusty-red AW logo and no background. What was really odd was that paint looked very faded...and I'm sure I saw the 'rounded-triangle' nacelles of the 737's CFM-engines...

Originally Posted by ashill
There are plenty of good reasons for AA not to be associated with US, but I think this is actually a nice touch.
Do you mean the "heritage liveries"?

cheers!
AAir_head is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 3:36 pm
  #127  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: Grounded
Posts: 669
Originally Posted by AAir_head
Definitely not the one on airliners.net; I didn't get a long look at it (or the tail #), but I don't think it was one of the other heritage liveries either--the tail was plain white with that sort-of rusty-red AW logo and no background. What was really odd was that paint looked very faded...and I'm sure I saw the 'rounded-triangle' nacelles of the 737's CFM-engines...



Do you mean the "heritage liveries"?

cheers!
There's apparently a couple of the heritage liveries, though a faded logo does sound unattractive.
MrPink is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2009, 3:41 pm
  #128  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by 6P&E
Your're right, in part or at least in the initial hub design, but in the last expansion (@1992) of the BNA hub before its complete shutdown in 1995, AA had vastly expanded its routes from BNA to the west, in part to provide a service from Southeastern cities that RDU did not provide.
For anyone interested in the history of the BNA & RDU hubs you can go to the airline hubs page at departedflights.com

Number of Daily Departures at Airline Hubs
Over Multi-Year Periods


The following pages show the number of daily departures operated by airlines at various hubs and how those numbers changed over a period of years.

AA Nashville Hub 1991-1995

AA Raleigh/Durham Hub 1987-1995
LoneStarMike is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2011, 4:32 pm
  #129  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 80
Rumors start again

AMR-USAirways: The next airline merger?
ORDinaryJoe is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2011, 4:37 pm
  #130  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM; UA 1K; AA 1MM
Posts: 4,513
Originally Posted by ORDinaryJoe
I see an AA/B6 buyout/merger way before AA/US (but what do I know, I'm not a CEO of anything).
ty97 is online now  
Old Oct 20, 2011, 4:58 pm
  #131  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
The jetBlue CFO resigned suddenly this week - which is usually an ominous sign at a public company, but B6 spun it as no big deal.

I can easily envision a purchase of B6 by AA once AA reduces its costs in Ch 11.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2011, 11:52 pm
  #132  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by FWAAA
The jetBlue CFO resigned suddenly this week - which is usually an ominous sign at a public company, but B6 spun it as no big deal.

I can easily envision a purchase of B6 by AA once AA reduces its costs in Ch 11.
Hardly. Companies change CFOs like socks. However, if B6 were to make a move such as a stock buyback, then that would be interesting. With LH about to unload their B6 stake, I'd watch out for some Texas Pacific Group/Gordon Bethune type outfit looking for "value opportunties" to sweep in.
volvo99 is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 5:09 am
  #133  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Well, if AA goes into Chapter 11 I would certainly be willing to wager that Doug Parker will be coming to call on the Unsecured Creditors' Committee with a proposal in hand. I'm not so sure I'd we would see anyone from JetBlue with such a deal for creditors. AA does not really fit Jet Blue's business model. That said, I would anticipate more of a tie up in the future in code sharing and even B6 coming into OW.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 6:51 am
  #134  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
Sometimes being single is better than being married.

There are a couple of interesting girls (B6/AS) out there who like to flirt, but aren't interested in anything serious. AS likes DL and being independent. B6 is union free, even though it has a lot of furloughed AA pilots.

There's another girl out there who wants to get married very badly (US). But seriously ... different aircraft types, worse union relations than AA by far, an international hub in the same region as JFK, low cost O&D markets, and a route structure that just doesn't do much for AA apart from the Southeast that AA could deal with through RDU if it wanted.

This is a deal that only investment bankers could love. It would certainly put both into bankruptcy.

Organic growth and partnerships with B6 and AS are a much better option than merging with US. Lets see what happens with the new APA contract and the Eagle spinoff.

Last edited by C17PSGR; Oct 21, 2011 at 6:57 am
C17PSGR is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 10:30 am
  #135  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SFO
Programs: United 1K
Posts: 2,264
No carrier is able to do a deal with AA until they go through bankruptcy.
jaguar is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.