Community
Wiki Posts
Search

VENT: Lying Gate Agent (or not)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2011, 1:22 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Programs: AA EXP, UA Premier Plat, Alaska MVP Gold, HHonors Diamond, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 2,053
VENT: Lying Gate Agent (or not)

Sorry, need to rant.

Flew back from DFW-AUS tonight on the 11:10 flight. I don't normally upgrade this route (because it's a) short and b) EXP heavy so I have little chance) but tonight there were 5 open in F and per the AC I was #4 on the upgrade list... and I was tired after a blown upgrade from SFO-DFW. You get what you pay for... and upgrades aren't guaranteed. Fine.

Get to the gate. Still #4 (of 4) on the list. EF shows F5/A5, seat map matches with five open. GA begins boarding process. I inquire if first checked in full, he replied yes. Several folks standing around sigh and head for the boarding line.

Fast forward: just before the door closes, I check EF again. Now F4/A4. Plane leaves with 4 empty F seats.

Rather than process the upgrade list, the GA simply lied, said it was full, and went on with things. Note: flight was not late, GA was at the gate 45 min before the flight, etc. NO rush. Blew upgrades for at least four people.

I'm not going to make a big deal out of this, and it's not worth a complaint to AA (since they track how often you complain, or so I'm told). You don't want to process upgrades? Fine. Just don't lie to me (us) about it.
mreed911 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 2:43 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Benicia, California, USA
Programs: AA PLT,AS,UA PP,J6,FB,EY,LH,SQ,HH Dmd,Hyatt Glbl,Marriott Plat,IHG Plat,Accor Gold
Posts: 10,820
Well, why not complain to AA? Just don't put it as a rant, rather in terms of you don't understand why you and others weren't upgraded under these circumstances. There's a chance the airline will come back with an acceptable explanation. And if there is no such explanation, at least it will know about the GA's conduct.
Thunderroad is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 3:14 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
2 comments..

1. In addition to ranting here, complain to AA
2. "First class has checked in full" doesn't mean all FC customers are in the boarding area. They could have checked in from home 24 hours earlier.
mvoight is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 3:17 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AMS
Programs: LH FTL, HH ♢, HGP P, Accor P
Posts: 840
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
Well, why not complain to AA? Just don't put it as a rant, rather in terms of you don't understand why you and others weren't upgraded under these circumstances. There's a chance the airline will come back with an acceptable explanation. And if there is no such explanation, at least it will know about the GA's conduct.
+1

They need to know what their people out in the field are doing
FlyinDutchman is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 6:17 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 879
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
Well, why not complain to AA? Just don't put it as a rant, rather in terms of you don't understand why you and others weren't upgraded under these circumstances. There's a chance the airline will come back with an acceptable explanation. And if there is no such explanation, at least it will know about the GA's conduct.
Sounds good to me. ^
elkhornne is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 6:48 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,629
Originally Posted by mvoight
2. "First class has checked in full" doesn't mean all FC customers are in the boarding area. They could have checked in from home 24 hours earlier.
Sure, but as the OP wrote EF showed at least 5 seat for sale which would not be the case if FC "checked in full". Solid proof that the GA was lying to save a few keystrokes.
millionmiler is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 6:50 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador, AA EXP
Posts: 2,704
I do hope that that AA distinguishes between legit complaints and ones that are simply attempts to get something out of nothing. So essentially reasonable vs unreasonable.
Xero is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 7:32 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
A review of the priority list on AA 785 last night - the 11:10 from DFW-AUS shows that the OP is in fact not correct - the flight went out full in F - but it would appear the GA didn't follow procedure either.

An EXP traveling on a paid First Class ticket who had accepted a seat assignment in coach received one first class seat. One EXP and two PLATs (or a PLAT and companion - it is the same PNR so both get coded as PLAT) received first class seats as well for a total of four.

The next two PLATs were not upgraded. The last PLAT on the list was upgraded.

The most logical explanation - the last PLAT was the one who waited it out at the gate. But of course the GA exacerbated this situation by giving out inaccurate information.
sts603 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 8:43 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Programs: AA PLT, 1.8mm
Posts: 6,988
Originally Posted by mreed911
I inquire if first checked in full, he replied yes.
You asked the wrong question. The proper question would have been "has FC boarded full ? They're not the same thing.
cynicAAl is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 9:10 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by cynicAAl
You asked the wrong question. The proper question would have been "has FC boarded full ? They're not the same thing.
Agreed. 10 years ago departing from a spoke if F checked in full it was 98% certain that it would board full. Now with OLCI that has changed.

Always at a hub, however, it was uncertain given the potential for misconnects. OLCI has only added to that uncertainty.
sts603 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 9:20 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Exec Platinum/MM, DL Gold/MM, Hilton Diamond, Accor Platinum, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 6,973
Originally Posted by sts603
A review of the priority list on AA 785 last night - the 11:10 from DFW-AUS shows that the OP is in fact not correct - the flight went out full in F - but it would appear the GA didn't follow procedure either.

An EXP traveling on a paid First Class ticket who had accepted a seat assignment in coach received one first class seat. One EXP and two PLATs (or a PLAT and companion - it is the same PNR so both get coded as PLAT) received first class seats as well for a total of four.

The next two PLATs were not upgraded. The last PLAT on the list was upgraded.

The most logical explanation - the last PLAT was the one who waited it out at the gate. But of course the GA exacerbated this situation by giving out inaccurate information.
Interesting. This is completely opposite to the OP's report. Either (1) one of you is "not correct" <redacted>, (2) there were 4 F seats open when the OP boarded but were filled out of his sight before departure, or (3) the GA processed the seat changes but never moved the pax.

Last edited by JDiver; Jun 11, 2011 at 11:42 am Reason: redacted unacceptable characterization
Stripe is online now  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 9:28 am
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by Stripe
Interesting. This is completely opposite to the OP's report. Either (1) one of you is "not correct" <redacted>, (2) there were 4 F seats open when the OP boarded but were filled out of his sight before departure, or (3) the GA processed the seat changes but never moved the pax.
Let's ask OP for a response here. He says, "[p]lane leaves with 4 empty F seats." Please confirm that there were still 4 empty seats when aircraft pushed back or is it that there were 4 seats when you boarded or last looked?

"Lying" is a bad term and perfectly honest people have mistaken perceptions here, but the minor details really matter here.

Last edited by JY1024; Jun 11, 2011 at 1:34 pm Reason: redacted statement deleted in OP
Often1 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 9:46 am
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by Stripe
Interesting. This is completely opposite to the OP's report. Either (1) one of you is "not correct" <reacted>, (2) there were 4 F seats open when the OP boarded but were filled out of his sight before departure, or (3) the GA processed the seat changes but never moved the pax.
I gave you a full account of the priority list. While I express no knowledge of who actually in the end sat in what seat, I'm clearly not just making up what the list says.

I certainly can't foreclose on (3) though my guess is that (2) occurred. Again, the OP lost his entitlement to the upgrade by boarding BUT did so based on false information from the GA.

Last edited by JDiver; Jun 11, 2011 at 11:42 am Reason: redacted statement deleted in OP
sts603 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 9:59 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: HND
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K
Posts: 1,230
Originally Posted by sts603
Again, the OP lost his entitlement to the upgrade by boarding
Is that accurate? Is the policy that you lose your spot on the list by boarding or that a GA is supposed to move you up from Y should your UG clear (though YMMV on whether or not they do)
tylerdurden4543 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2011, 10:07 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,204
Originally Posted by sts603
Again, the OP lost his entitlement to the upgrade by boarding BUT did so based on false information from the GA.
That is not what I have understood.

However, I do know GAs do that often in the interest of on time departure.
ilovetofly is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.