FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/alaska-airlines-mileage-plan-442/)
-   -   New F Seats (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/alaska-airlines-mileage-plan/1866773-new-f-seats.html)

gobeavs8 Sep 13, 2017 4:08 pm

New F Seats
 
Did not see this posted anywhere. Feel free to delete if its already been posted.

https://www.dallasnews.com/business/......-seats-made

MonThruThurs Sep 13, 2017 4:33 pm


Originally Posted by gobeavs8 (Post 28812490)
Did not see this posted anywhere. Feel free to delete if its already been posted.

https://www.dallasnews.com/business/......-seats-made

Interesting article. Was not worth having to go into private browsing mode as they're blocking access to users utilzing Ad-Blocker. Innovate or die.

SF1K Sep 13, 2017 4:37 pm

Thanks for sharing. Strange that the pics don't show the footrest?

Also the article states that when installed they will have an extra 5" of legroom from current configuration. I'm assuming that is only the case for those planes that have not already seen the increased pitch in F?

acarney Sep 13, 2017 4:38 pm


Originally Posted by SF1K (Post 28812601)
Thanks for sharing. Strange that the pics don't show the footrest?

Also the article states that when installed they will have an extra 5" of legroom from current configuration. I'm assuming that is only the case for those planes that have not already seen the increased pitch in F?

I didn't even make it that far, I got hit with a bunch of ads and full screen video, just closed the window....

AndyPatterson Sep 13, 2017 5:18 pm

Notice how the mount or divider UNDER the seat is not evenly spaced! One seat has the floor mount on the side, while the other seat has the floor mount nearly in the middle. This means, for people trying to put their carryon bag under the seat in front of them, that one person will have to jam it into the "center" space that is supposed to be shared with the other passenger in your row.

https://dallasnews.imgix.net/1505254...&q=60&fit=clip

lg20 Sep 13, 2017 5:40 pm


Originally Posted by AndyPatterson (Post 28812710)
Notice how the mount or divider UNDER the seat is not evenly spaced! One seat has the floor mount on the side, while the other seat has the floor mount nearly in the middle. This means, for people trying to put their carryon bag under the seat in front of them, that one person will have to jam it into the "center" space that is supposed to be shared with the other passenger in your row.

https://dallasnews.imgix.net/1505254...&q=60&fit=clip

It looks just like the mounting track is just the same as it currently is on those planes. I can't imagine they'd change it, which would be a lot more work than just replacing the seats.

sltlyamusd Sep 13, 2017 5:42 pm


Originally Posted by SF1K (Post 28812601)
Thanks for sharing. Strange that the pics don't show the footrest?

Also the article states that when installed they will have an extra 5" of legroom from current configuration. I'm assuming that is only the case for those planes that have not already seen the increased pitch in F?

Yeah, pitch is 41" as I understand, so same as the reconfigured planes currently have. Legroom might be slightly better if the new seatback is thinner. Per the article, seat will not have a legrest, but just a fold-out footrest. Probably just a metal bar that folds down from the back of the seat in front of you. Amtrak has this style of footrest on some of the seats on their trains. I find them pretty useless.

Eujeanie Sep 13, 2017 7:30 pm


Originally Posted by sltlyamusd (Post 28812772)
Yeah, pitch is 41" as I understand, so same as the reconfigured planes currently have. Legroom might be slightly better if the new seatback is thinner. Per the article, seat will not have a legrest, but just a fold-out footrest. Probably just a metal bar that folds down from the back of the seat in front of you. Amtrak has this style of footrest on some of the seats on their trains. I find them pretty useless.

Looks like they don't have the extra little tray that pulls out from the center, either. We like having lots of horizontal space, and will miss that little tray.

beckoa Sep 13, 2017 8:02 pm


Originally Posted by Eujeanie (Post 28813059)
Looks like they don't have the extra little tray that pulls out from the center, either. We like having lots of horizontal space, and will miss that little tray.

They talked about drink holders...

Eujeanie Sep 13, 2017 8:32 pm


Originally Posted by beckoa (Post 28813147)
They talked about drink holders...

You mean as shown in the picture? (I didn't read the article based on what someone else said about the ads, other crap, etc) - what do those drink holders have to do with the EXTRA surface of the little tray? Not everyone uses their space in the same way - drink holders are useless to us, an extra surface is very useful.

BOB W Sep 13, 2017 9:07 pm

"When they’re installed on Alaska’s aircraft starting in late 2018".....with a complete retro-fit a few years later:rolleyes:

Alaska gives "snails pace" a whole new meaning.

T2A Sep 13, 2017 9:07 pm


Originally Posted by sltlyamusd (Post 28812772)
Yeah, pitch is 41" as I understand, so same as the reconfigured planes currently have. Legroom might be slightly better if the new seatback is thinner. Per the article, seat will not have a legrest, but just a fold-out footrest. Probably just a metal bar that folds down from the back of the seat in front of you. Amtrak has this style of footrest on some of the seats on their trains. I find them pretty useless.

Agreed. I was really looking forward to a leg rest. These new seats look pretty underwhelming.

BOB W Sep 13, 2017 9:12 pm


Originally Posted by Eujeanie (Post 28813234)
drink holders are useless to us, an extra surface is very useful.

Agreed

beckoa Sep 13, 2017 9:14 pm


Originally Posted by T2A (Post 28813320)
Agreed. I was really looking forward to a leg rest. These new seats look pretty underwhelming.

I dread them. They always seem designed for shorter individuals, and impact leg room negatively.

quemalo Sep 13, 2017 9:21 pm


Originally Posted by beckoa (Post 28813336)
I dread them. They always seem designed for shorter individuals, and impact leg room negatively.

Totally not empty quoting this.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:27 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.