Community
Wiki Posts
Search

QX cutting flights due to pilot shortage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2017, 5:34 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Intermountain West
Programs: Too many to list
Posts: 12,082
? for the experts: 3 of us are flying BOI-SEA in mid-August, on way to KOA, but we are on a 739. The flt is still wide open. Will the fact that we are on a 739, and not a Q400, increase the odds of AS NOT canceling our flt? Thx
philemer is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 6:35 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Originally Posted by philemer
? for the experts: 3 of us are flying BOI-SEA in mid-August, on way to KOA, but we are on a 739. The flt is still wide open. Will the fact that we are on a 739, and not a Q400, increase the odds of AS NOT canceling our flt? Thx
If you are on a 739 it is operated by AS, not QX. Cancellations at QX don't affect AS, you should be fine...but I would double check the reservation anyway.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 6:41 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Horizon Air cutting hundreds of flights this summer due to pilot shortage

http://www.seattletimes.com/business...ilot-shortage/
I think this is pretty ridiculous and pathetic. Alaska has been adding and adding flights all year - and even more so since acquiring Virgin America. To say this problem was not foreseeable is ridiculous.

Alaska created this mess all on it's own.
WebTraveler is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 6:43 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by cruisezone
Looks like one PSC-SEA was cut as well. What gets me is that they also cut the only PSC-PDX flight, even though they said they were targeting city pairs with multiple daily flights.
Don't the Palm Springs flights historically fall off in summer when its hotter than heck anyway?
WebTraveler is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 6:56 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sunny Seattle
Programs: AS MVPG 75K, HH Diamond
Posts: 539
PSC is Pasco/Tri-Cities, WA.

Possibly also a resizing? I recall the SEA-PSC frequency jumped up after DL started flying it too, and perhaps now they're convinced the market is stable enough to return to earlier levels of service.
Kieron is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 9:31 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Inauspicious start for regularly-scheduled QX E175 PDX-OAK service tomorrow. SkyWest is covering four of the first five runs from PDX.
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 10:36 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,838
Apparently a bad calculus on the part of AAG: underpaying/pinching the labor agreement for the QX pilots is going to cost a lot more than intended. Personally, I want a well-compensated professional at the controls. Duh.
flytoeat is online now  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 11:10 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SGF
Programs: AS, AA, UA, AGR S (former 75K, GLD, 1K, and S+, now an elite peon)
Posts: 23,194
Originally Posted by alphaeagle
There are not as many pilots due to the insane new requirements to be a pilot. It's cheaper and quicker to get your PhD. And there is no reason for it. Doesn't help that pay isn't that good, but certainly not the only reason why there is a shortage now. People can't afford to meet the new arbitrary requirements to fly for an airline.
Won't simple market forces dictate higher starting pay for pilots at regionals? When the pay gets high enough, I would think it would stimulate some additional supply as prospective pilots decide that incurring $50K or whatever of debt for flight training training is worth doing, because the rewards are worth it. Either they do that or they start to follow the foreign model where they take newhires with little or no aviation experience and pay them to go through flight school. I mean, that model works for doctors and the insane costs of medical school...

Either way, yes, there will be increased costs for the regionals, so the mainline carriers will have to increase their contract pay to the regionals, which means fares will increase...
jackal is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2017, 11:49 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
Originally Posted by jsguyrus
If you are on a 739 it is operated by AS, not QX. Cancellations at QX don't affect AS, you should be fine...but I would double check the reservation anyway.
Are you sure about that? Because I've seen where OO/QX/AS have been subbed in for one of the others and it wouldn't be that hard to go the other way- cancel one and move that craft/crew over to another more needed flight slot.
rustykettel is offline  
Old Jul 1, 2017, 2:17 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 2,204
Originally Posted by WebTraveler
I think this is pretty ridiculous and pathetic. Alaska has been adding and adding flights all year - and even more so since acquiring Virgin America. To say this problem was not foreseeable is ridiculous.

Alaska created this mess all on it's own.
I don't think it's penny pinching so much as that QX basically has not undergone serious growth in many years. Yes, starting RJ pilots are very underpaid, but that is industry-wide. As regionals go, Horizon doesn't pay badly. If Horizon hadn't been retraining a bunch of q400 pilots to fly new E175 routes, this wouldn't be nearly as bad. The issue seems to be hiring and training not keeping up with retirements during a period of sustained growth. For years, Qx has been basically the same size (52 q400s) and they even shrunk somewhat after retiring the CRJ-700 flying 7-8 years ago. Remember there were about 20 CRJs in the fleet at one point after most q400s were already delivered, so juggling two fleet types is not a novel thing at QX.

in some ways, I really question all the combined AS and DL growth out of Seattle, as the airport is now very congested and Atc delays are common, whereas five years ago they were almost unheard of. I understand the need to compete with DL, but the last thing the airport needs is more 76 seat aircraft clogging up gates and airspace. Growth brings in new customers but bad reliability kills loyalty, and AS can't afford that when the competition is as well run as DL.

Last edited by sltlyamusd; Jul 1, 2017 at 2:49 am
sltlyamusd is online now  
Old Jul 1, 2017, 2:35 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 2,204
Originally Posted by rustykettel
Are you sure about that? Because I've seen where OO/QX/AS have been subbed in for one of the others and it wouldn't be that hard to go the other way- cancel one and move that craft/crew over to another more needed flight slot.
i see AS filling in for QX and OO. Also OO filling in QX. Most of the time, the equipment or crew shortage is with the regionals and not mainline. Also, if QX is short-handed, it's more efficient to fold two q400 shutttle flights into one 737.

Last edited by sltlyamusd; Jul 1, 2017 at 2:53 am
sltlyamusd is online now  
Old Jul 1, 2017, 9:30 am
  #27  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by jackal
Won't simple market forces dictate higher starting pay for pilots at regionals? When the pay gets high enough, I would think it would stimulate some additional supply as prospective pilots decide that incurring $50K or whatever of debt for flight training training is worth doing, because the rewards are worth it. Either they do that or they start to follow the foreign model where they take newhires with little or no aviation experience and pay them to go through flight school. I mean, that model works for doctors and the insane costs of medical school...

Either way, yes, there will be increased costs for the regionals, so the mainline carriers will have to increase their contract pay to the regionals, which means fares will increase...
I agree - I think they have created a double edged sword problem for regionals like QX from both ends of the spectrum.

Hiring new pilots, or enticing those to pursue a flying career, has been a challenge considering the starting pay is barely living wage with inconsistent pay (summer more flying, winter less flying).

Then on the other end of the spectrum regionals and mainline partners have established "fasttrack" programs where after several years regional pilots become eligible to interview/transfer into mainline. While in idea this is great however we are in this era where many seasoned mainline pilots are retiring.

This creates a perfect job turnover storm - challenges on both the hiring and retention fronts.

To really address this issue I think mainline partners and regional partners need to start looking at this from one "pool" rather than regional pool and mainline pool and collectively come up with strategies to address this challenge. This is also partially the shareholders/wall street's fault (short term mentality focused on increasing profits and tying 80-90% of exec comp to financial performance) and this problem isn't limited to airlines. In banking there is a serious talent shortage problem.

Trying not to delve into OMNI/PR but I think the medical industry has the opposite problem -- they took advantage of our desire to be healthy, or survive, and profiteered off of that. This is a society problem in the US that needs to change. A simple operation should not cost $250K where a week of sitting in a hospital bed under monitoring costs $40K -- North Island or a Soneva villa in the Maldives charges a fraction of that for two people!

Last edited by golfingboy; Jul 1, 2017 at 9:40 am
golfingboy is offline  
Old Jul 1, 2017, 9:41 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
They also decided to use the E175s almost entirely for expansion (or replacing OO E175 or AS 737 on SEA-ONT/SFO/OAK/FAT/SBA etc), when they obviously didn't have the pilots for it, rather than replacing longer Q400 routes. A little less expansion and a little more replacing Q400 flying would have lessened the problem.

Last edited by ucdtim17; Jul 1, 2017 at 11:19 am
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Jul 1, 2017, 10:15 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Starting pilot pay at QX is $36,000 per year plus $20,000 hiring bonus, so $56,000. Year two which has no bonus is $41,400, year three is $42,300. QX does not offer flow through hiring to AS. So for a four year degree and all its associated costs PLUS about $60,000 additional in flight training paid to the university they make $42,000. Kind of hard to live in Seattle or Portland on that kind of wage while repaying the college debt.

http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/a...al/horizon_air
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Jul 1, 2017, 11:14 am
  #30  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by jsguyrus
Starting pilot pay at QX is $36,000 per year plus $20,000 hiring bonus, so $56,000. Year two which has no bonus is $41,400, year three is $42,300. QX does not offer flow through hiring to AS. So for a four year degree and all its associated costs PLUS about $60,000 additional in flight training paid to the university they make $42,000. Kind of hard to live in Seattle or Portland on that kind of wage while repaying the college debt.

http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/a...al/horizon_air
Agree with you - one detail about flow through hiring with AS.. On the QX career site it states:

"Our pay just got better
Now with a new top tier compensation package, new airframe in the fleet, a guaranteed interview program with Alaska Airlines, and more, the time for career takeoff is now."

Not sure how many years before they become eligible to interview for AS but I can't imagine it is that long (several years?).

Programs like this one really benefits mainline and exacerbates the hiring/retention problem for regionals.
golfingboy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.