737-800 F Seats Terrible
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Ester, Alaska
Programs: Alaska Million Miler, United Million Miler, Wyndham Rewards Diamond, Choice Hotels Diamond
Posts: 12,146
Back in the 70s and 80s I often paid full fare for First Class but then the seating was more spacious and the meals were more elaborate. (I remember flying Alaska's new 727-200 between SFO and SEA back in 1979. The plane featured spacious and comfortable First Class seats and we were served a three course dinner on the one hour and forty minute flight.)
That said, from the perspective of one who enjoys First Class via the occasional upgrade these days, I think Alaska's First Class is perfectly acceptable.
It would be interesting to know what percentage of Alaska's First Class passengers system wide are actually paying full fare as opposed to enjoying their good fortune due to their upgrade benefits. Alaska is very generous with its upgrade policies and looks after its top tier elites as well or better than any other airline out there. As such, I should imagine both the hard and soft aspects of Alaska's First Class product are predicated upon the fact that a significant percentage of its First Class clientele are riding up there via upgrade.
Last edited by Seat 2A; Aug 30, 2015 at 9:14 pm
#47
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,307
#49
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AS
Posts: 83
"and our P class or discounted first-class fares helped boost our paid first-class load factor by 1.6 points to 35%"
#50
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: LHR, DFW, J Cabins WorldWide
Programs: AA EXP, UA GS, FB Gold, AS MVPG, MR Titanium, VS Gold
Posts: 954
I have to agree. I find AS's FC seats, along with some DL F seats on some aircraft, to be much less comfortable. I rarely pay for P, let alone F on AS, have had more than good enough luck between GGU and comp upgrades. Balance it out with some $400+ RT lat minute tickets to BOI or EAT. But recently those delta A/G/P fares have just been too good for better planes IMO for me to spend my FC $ on AS.
#52
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: AS MVPG, CO, NW(now DL), Flying Blue
Posts: 6,554
cant be much of a difference. I think the more open style seating on AA F 738s gives the illusion of more space. Personally I prefer the AS center armrest/console over the AA 738s
#53
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ANC
Programs: AS MVPG
Posts: 244
well since you asked...
I am in the camp that does not find the new F seats to be comfortable. Because I am only 62.5" tall, leg room is a non-issue but the seat height is. I cannot touch the floor unless I'm wearing tall shoes (danskos, etc) and this makes it somewhat difficult to get comfortable on a long flight. Fortunately I am also rather petite so I tend to sit criss-cross or just select row 1 so I can put my feet up on the bulkhead (yes, I know some have issues with that).
Not a complaint you see often but that's my beef with the new seats. However, I am only in F on an upgrade, so I don't mind all that much. On longer red-eye flights, row 17 is far more comfortable for me than the F seats when I'm trying to get some sleep.
Not a complaint you see often but that's my beef with the new seats. However, I am only in F on an upgrade, so I don't mind all that much. On longer red-eye flights, row 17 is far more comfortable for me than the F seats when I'm trying to get some sleep.
#54
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: AS MVPG, CO, NW(now DL), Flying Blue
Posts: 6,554
I am in the camp that does not find the new F seats to be comfortable. Because I am only 62.5" tall, leg room is a non-issue but the seat height is. I cannot touch the floor unless I'm wearing tall shoes (danskos, etc) and this makes it somewhat difficult to get comfortable on a long flight. Fortunately I am also rather petite so I tend to sit criss-cross or just select row 1 so I can put my feet up on the bulkhead (yes, I know some have issues with that).
Not a complaint you see often but that's my beef with the new seats. However, I am only in F on an upgrade, so I don't mind all that much. On longer red-eye flights, row 17 is far more comfortable for me than the F seats when I'm trying to get some sleep.
Not a complaint you see often but that's my beef with the new seats. However, I am only in F on an upgrade, so I don't mind all that much. On longer red-eye flights, row 17 is far more comfortable for me than the F seats when I'm trying to get some sleep.
#55
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Canada
Programs: AS, DL, UA, Hyatt, SPG
Posts: 2,574
It would be interesting to know what percentage of Alaska's First Class passengers system wide are actually paying full fare as opposed to enjoying their good fortune due to their upgrade benefits. Alaska is very generous with its upgrade policies and looks after its top tier elites as well or better than any other airline out there. As such, I should imagine both the hard and soft aspects of Alaska's First Class product are predicated upon the fact that a significant percentage of its First Class clientele are riding up there via upgrade.
AS has floated out some discounted "P" fares on select routes here and there (but I've yet to see any on any of the routes I fly). Anytime I've checked AS when looking at DL (or AA, or UA) AS has been exorbitantly priced up front in comparison, and I just can't justify paying $2200+ for a roundtrip to Florida when Delta is $800-$1000 r/t up front. And if the price discrepancy wasn't enough, I honestly feel that Delta's domestic F product is better (pillows, blankets, PDB's...)
I love the AS people, the flexibility and can-do attitude, and AS has taken really good care of me whenever I've flown with them. I just wish they'd either price the up front cabin competitively, or be a little more generous with U space for folks paying higher economy fares and looking to use the upgrade certs.
Back on topic, I do agree that the 738's have a subpar F cabin that feels somewhat cramped with the inferior seat pitch.
#56
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,834
In my opinion, there's a significant difference in pitch (36" vs 40") and AA's seatbacks do not intrude into your space when reclined.
#57
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA MM Plat, UA 1MM, Hilton Lifetime Gold, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold, CLEAR, AS MVP Gold
Posts: 3,614
Just completed a trip SMF-OGG-SMF in F class on an AS 737-800. The seat was horrible. Only 36" of legroom vs. 42" on HA. Even AA's 737-800's have 40". I'm unable to find any other major carrier with a pitch as small as AS has. The seat backs are so thick (maybe 5") that as soon as you try to put your seat back you're in the lap of the person behind you. Seat itself was quite uncomfortable. This made for very uncomfortable long flights. I hope F seat replacements are in the works before we fly them again.
#58
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
#59
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sacramento, CA
Programs: AA Exec Plat, Hyatt,Marriott,BA,AS
Posts: 4,423
What could AS have been thinking when they installed these terrible seats? I suppose it was to "improve the passenger experience".
#60
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Treasure Coast, FL
Programs: DL Diamond, Marriott LT Plat, HH Diamond, Avis Preferred Plus, National Executive
Posts: 4,578
Currently on one of those vaunted DL 737-800's and their 38" of seat pitch (I am 5' 8" as an FYI). Also no personal TV on this old bird: