Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

New Rule Prohibiting Infants in Bulkhead Row/Seat Belt Air Bag Discussion Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New Rule Prohibiting Infants in Bulkhead Row/Seat Belt Air Bag Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2010, 8:46 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ADQ
Programs: Alaska Air
Posts: 456
New Rule Prohibiting Infants in Bulkhead Row/Seat Belt Air Bag Discussion Thread

I flew with the family on two trips recently, having booked my tickets last October. At the boarding gate we were redirected to the desk to have our seats reassigned. Alaska Air cited a new policy prohibiting infants in the bulkhead row. Has anybody heard of this? One worker told me it was an FAA rule.

It must be a new one, as we traveled last November on an 8 segment trip and had no such problems. I searched the Alaska Air website and found no information on it. And of course, Alaska Air let me select those seats originally when I booked the ticket with no problem.

Last edited by wildway; Apr 24, 2010 at 8:46 am Reason: Spelling
wildway is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2010, 10:00 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVPG, Bonvoy Titanium, NEXUS
Posts: 174
Was this a lap child, or simply an infant in a seat? We flew in Row 6 CUN-SEA just a couple weeks ago with our baby and 3 year-old (but everyone had a seat and the baby was in her carseat). We always try for that row with the kids, I'd be sad to see a rule like that in place.
brownnet is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2010, 10:01 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Starting with the latest delivery (N529AS), new aircraft are coming with air bags built into the seat belts in bulkhead rows only. I suspect that is the reasoning and since it is unknown which aircraft you will be flying on, I gather the rule was made to simplify things.
Bay Area Blue is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2010, 10:08 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA, US
Programs: lots of little things
Posts: 705
Originally Posted by Bay Area Blue
Starting with the latest delivery (N529AS), new aircraft are coming with air bags built into the seat belts in bulkhead rows only. I suspect that is the reasoning and since it is unknown which aircraft you will be flying on, I gather the rule was made to simplify things.
Correct, New policy for the new aircraft and FAA policy. Although there won't be any retro-fitting of air-belts on all previous aircraft, this is now an across the board policy for car-seats/lap infants. If you get to fly on 529, or future delivered aircraft, check out the thick blue seatbelts in rows 1 & 6.
dc333 is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2010, 11:49 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: Alaska Airlines, Hilton HHonors
Posts: 169
On my last flight, a couple got moved out of the bulkhead seats because they were traveling with a small dog in a small carrier. I thought it was weird they got moved when the flight was underway. Makes me wonder where the dog was when we first took off!
ginteralaska is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2010, 9:43 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 406
Interesting video showin the seat belt air bags in action:
http://gizmodo.com/5390009/your-next...have-an-airbag
beaver is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2010, 10:30 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,623
Any rules/regs on compatibility with seatbelt extenders? (That is going to create a world of controversy if they aren't, but somehow I suspect that they aren't.)
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Apr 25, 2010, 10:34 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
Any rules/regs on compatibility with seatbelt extenders? (That is going to create a world of controversy if they aren't, but somehow I suspect that they aren't.)
Seatbelt extensions are still allowed on these new seats. The airplanes that have the airbag belts have the compatable extensions onboard.
Bay Area Blue is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2010, 11:57 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ANC
Programs: AS 100K
Posts: 119
I ran into something similar, although a bit different, flying with my college age kids in F around Christmas. A couple in front of us had two lap infants so the cabin crew said they couldn't sit together (in case we had to deploy oxygen masks). One of my boys ended up swapping seats with one of the parents.
pipeliner is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2010, 9:28 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by pipeliner
I ran into something similar, although a bit different, flying with my college age kids in F around Christmas. A couple in front of us had two lap infants so the cabin crew said they couldn't sit together (in case we had to deploy oxygen masks). One of my boys ended up swapping seats with one of the parents.
For as long as I have been in the industry, the rule has been no more than 1 infant in a set of seats due to the amount of emergency oxygen masks in the PSU. There is 1 extra mask in each PSU.
Bay Area Blue is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2010, 2:32 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: (PHL) Cape May, NJ
Programs: MVP Gold 75K, Board Room, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 2,439
Originally Posted by pipeliner
I ran into something similar, although a bit different, flying with my college age kids in F around Christmas. A couple in front of us had two lap infants so the cabin crew said they couldn't sit together (in case we had to deploy oxygen masks). One of my boys ended up swapping seats with one of the parents.
There are also some aircraft (i dont think any are in the alaska fleet), that only have extra masks for infants on alternating rows. I think it might be some of delta's 757? I cant really remember what aircraft i was on.
maokh is offline  
Old May 7, 2010, 8:22 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SEA
Programs: AS-MM 75K, Marriott Plat Lifetime, SPG Plat Lifetime, HH Gold
Posts: 78
AS Seat belt w/ airbag, true?

Last night on the 8:15 pm LAX-SEA flight I was in 1C, the seat belt was unusually thick. The FA informed us that the seat belts had airbags in them.

Is this true? Anyone experienced this?

The seatbelt was not uncomfortable just looked funny.
magiclamp is offline  
Old May 7, 2010, 9:02 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 406
Originally Posted by magiclamp
Last night on the 8:15 pm LAX-SEA flight I was in 1C, the seat belt was unusually thick. The FA informed us that the seat belts had airbags in them.

Is this true? Anyone experienced this?

The seatbelt was not uncomfortable just looked funny.
Yep, true. I'm not finding the thread but we discussed it a couple of weeks ago.

Congrats - you were on one of AS's newest aircraft. Those are seat belts are in rows 1 and 6.
beaver is offline  
Old May 7, 2010, 9:55 pm
  #14  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP Gold
Posts: 2,732
A simple search of this forum for the word "airbag" turns up this thread where it was discussed:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/alask...khead-row.html
baliktad is offline  
Old May 8, 2010, 12:57 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVPG, Marriott Platinum, AVIS First, National Emerald Club
Posts: 405
Infants also cannot be within 1-2 rows of the exit row - not sure why - but I have seen families moved.

As for the airbag belts, it is just a matter of time until a toddler or some curious person triggers the device and it will be a lawyer's happy day. We'll see....
sigueugis is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.