Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Airtran Airways | A+ Rewards
Reload this Page >

Bag fees on FL planes painted with WN livery?

Bag fees on FL planes painted with WN livery?

 
Old Mar 29, 2012, 11:45 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 187
Bag fees on FL planes painted with WN livery?

I just read this article where a WN spokesperson says that bag fees will remain on FL into 2013 with no target date to end the fees in sight. The article below states that FL planes are being painted to the WN livery as soon as April.

My question: Will those newly painted planes be used for FL flights even though they have a WN paint scheme? If they are, wouldn't WN be required to waive bag fees for those flights since all their advertising says 'Bags fly free on Southwest'? Seems like a big case of false advertising to fly on a Southwest plane but still have to pay fees for the bags in the belly of the plane.


http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/ne...ees-after.html

http://www.ajc.com/business/airtran-...n-1400774.html

Last edited by travelingfool23; Mar 29, 2012 at 11:48 am Reason: added correct URL
travelingfool23 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2012, 11:50 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: ONT
Programs: AA Gold, WN A-, UA S, HH ♦, IHG Spire, Hertz Prez O, TSA Disparager
Posts: 2,159
I'm suing WN over false advertising of "bags fly free." They charged me $466 to fly my mother-in-law out from Tulsa.

Where's the rim shot?

Seriously though, I agree they should not charge bag fees if it's a SWA plane.
Michael El is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2012, 11:51 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 228
travelingfool23
My question: Will those newly painted planes be used for FL flights even though they have a WN paint scheme?
No
hat attack is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2012, 12:32 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
It's my understanding that, when a plane is converted to WN, it will fly as WN, with no bag fees.

It won't be FL flying as WN or WN flying as FL.
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2012, 4:33 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Local media did a story on this last evening. Bag fees will remain intact for all AirTran flights, despite being owned by SWA.

Bags fly free on SWA flights.
RSVP is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 6:59 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Originally Posted by RSVP
Local media did a story on this last evening. Bag fees will remain intact for all AirTran flights, despite being owned by SWA.

Bags fly free on SWA flights.
http://fox6now.com/2012/03/28/busine...eport-3-28-12/
RSVP is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 7:39 am
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 187
Originally Posted by RSVP
Local media did a story on this last evening. Bag fees will remain intact for all AirTran flights, despite being owned by SWA.

Bags fly free on SWA flights.
Yes, but I think the question is what constitutes an AirTran flight? Can AirTran operate a flight on a 717 (and thus charge bag fees) when the paint scheme is WN? Does the paint scheme change ownership of the plane from FL to WN?
travelingfool23 is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 7:47 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by travelingfool23
Yes, but I think the question is what constitutes an AirTran flight? Can AirTran operate a flight on a 717 (and thus charge bag fees) when the paint scheme is WN? Does the paint scheme change ownership of the plane from FL to WN?
When the paint scheme changes, the aircraft is converted from FL to WN service, thus there are no bags fees after its converted to WN.

It does not appear that FL will be operating any planes on behalf of WN or vice versa.
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 8:33 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
What will happen if codeshare is initiated?
mke9499 is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 9:08 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by mke9499
What will happen if codeshare is initiated?
According to Resolution 302 WN would be MSC as WN is the 1st marketing carrier.
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 11:31 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,454
Originally Posted by travelingfool23
Y Can AirTran operate a flight on a 717 (and thus charge bag fees) when the paint scheme is WN?
Yes they can - but they won't, based upon all announcements made. If that 717 has WN livery, you will buy the ticket on the WN web site flying on a WN route with WN seating and flying under all WN rules and WN CoC.
lougord99 is online now  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 12:12 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by mke9499
What will happen if codeshare is initiated?
I'm doubting a code share will ever occur. At the rate the code share work is progressing, they could have most of the planes converted instead.
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 1:31 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Originally Posted by newsmanhoss
I'm doubting a code share will ever occur. At the rate the code share work is progressing, they could have most of the planes converted instead.
That is the $64,000 question. As for the bag fees, they already are competing against themselves with and without bag fees in markets like ATL-HOU and BOS-BWI. It's not a matter of legalities, just a matter of (potential) customer confusion or unhappiness.

Same is true if at some point AirTran-painted planes fly as Southwest or vice versa. No laws or regulations would be broken because the contract of carriage is between the passenger and the carrier selling the service. Doesn't matter who operates it. If the E190 is temporarily grounded and JetBlue contracts with Sun Country to pick up some of their flying for a time, it's not Sun Country's contract of carriage in effect --it's JetBlue's

The bigger issue is potential confusion and/or unhappiness with the customer base about fees versus no fees. It's very subjective to guess the amount of bad will Southwest is building based on hammering away at the evil of various fees charged by other airlines, while still charging those same fares at a large subsidiary. Early on it probably wasn't as big a deal, as "nothing will change right away" makes sense. But as more and more time passes, and as Southwest increasingly intermixes with AirTran, the fees charged by AirTran are likely to be increasingly glaring.
knope2001 is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2012, 5:51 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,454
Originally Posted by knope2001
Same is true if at some point AirTran-painted planes fly as Southwest or vice versa.
While many things that were stated have not occurred, it has been clearly articulated and not yet broken, that your statement will not happen.
lougord99 is online now  
Old Apr 2, 2012, 8:11 am
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 187
what about IROPs?

Does FL put passengers on WN flights when FL has maintenance issues? Is it possible those FL pax are paying for bags that travel on WN planes while the WN pax are not?
travelingfool23 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.