Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airline Programs > Airlines of India

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 9, 08, 11:37 am   #151
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MAA
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 1,902
Save money by flying direct? Ultra Long Haul with capacity / weight restrictions and all..
hserus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 08, 10:46 am   #152
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere near DCA. NW Platinum. AA Platinum.
Posts: 11,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by hserus View Post
Save money by flying direct? Ultra Long Haul with capacity / weight restrictions and all..
I don't see how a few times a week non-stop flight is going to be more marketable than a daily one stop flight.
__________________
Those who sacrifice liberty of some to purchase a little temporary safety, will have neither liberty nor safety.
Yaatri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 08, 5:52 pm   #153
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Gold, WN, UA, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 207
May be they should extend the newly introduced BLR-LHR flight to SFO, if loads on the BLR-LHR flight are not good.
hyho61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1, 08, 2:34 am   #154
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
A345 seatplan

Posted here
http://www.seatplans.com/airlines/Kingfisher/A340-542
Tom Otley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1, 08, 5:50 pm   #155
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 21
Kingfisher going bust!?

Forget about BLR-SFO nonstop.... Kingfisher has withdrawn its application with US DOT for route authority!

All their 345's are re-sold... 3 to Arik Air and 2 to HiFly(yet tobe confirmed!)

Only long haul a/c they have is A332... that can only do one stop options! For some reason they seem to be not taking delivery of these.. some are piling up dust sitting in TLS!

Any Indian flyertalk people with inside info??

pdxPort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 08, 8:41 pm   #156
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
What's going on

No news of BLR-SFO route. Are they postponing again or cancel altogether? Any insider news?
fly4Anywhere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 08, 9:50 pm   #157
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Gold, WN, UA, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxPort View Post
Forget about BLR-SFO nonstop.... Kingfisher has withdrawn its application with US DOT for route authority!

All their 345's are re-sold... 3 to Arik Air and 2 to HiFly(yet tobe confirmed!)

Only long haul a/c they have is A332... that can only do one stop options! For some reason they seem to be not taking delivery of these.. some are piling up dust sitting in TLS!

Any Indian flyertalk people with inside info??

May be SFO-India route is not a money maker afterall.

In light of the suspension of Jet Airways BOM-PVG-SFO flight from Jan. 2009, perhaps Kingfisher is getting cold feet on flying to SFO or any city in US.

Their best hope is codeshares with VS or UA from SFO and other big US cities to LHR to connect to their LHR-BLR flight. They should explore frequent flyer program participation as well.
hyho61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 08, 12:12 am   #158
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: la,ca,usa
Posts: 149
any thoughts for them to fly to Los angeles??
lax747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 08, 12:37 am   #159
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyho61 View Post
May be SFO-India route is not a money maker afterall.

In light of the suspension of Jet Airways BOM-PVG-SFO flight from Jan. 2009, .
is there a link for this? Darn economy.
__________________
There is another FTer called UAfan. In my name there is a space between "UA" and "Fan".
UA Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 08, 8:54 pm   #160
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere near DCA. NW Platinum. AA Platinum.
Posts: 11,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyho61 View Post
May be SFO-India route is not a money maker afterall.

In light of the suspension of Jet Airways BOM-PVG-SFO flight from Jan. 2009, perhaps Kingfisher is getting cold feet on flying to SFO or any city in US.

Their best hope is codeshares with VS or UA from SFO and other big US cities to LHR to connect to their LHR-BLR flight. They should explore frequent flyer program participation as well.
A very good point that was hard for some to recognise. BLR-SFO is not route that would be lucrative or even viable under all circumstances.
__________________
Those who sacrifice liberty of some to purchase a little temporary safety, will have neither liberty nor safety.
Yaatri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 08, 9:01 pm   #161
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, DL PLT, Hawaiian Pualani GLD, Starwood PLT, Shangri-La EXEC, Hilton/Marriott SLVR
Posts: 895
Aviation Daily reported today that the DGCA has threatened Kingfisher with the suspension of all international flights since they haven't operated an adequate number of flights on domestic 'non-viable social sectors,' whatever that means. Vijay Mallya has cut short a trip to Japan and rushed back to India, and has asked for one day's reprieve to respond.

Meanwhile, the story continues, Kingfisher will NOT be flying to the U.S. any time soon, and the BOM-LHR non-stop is not expected to start October 26. BLR-LHR has been a disaster to-date, with an average 35 passengers per flight.
ORD_UA1K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 08, 9:02 pm   #162
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, DL PLT, Hawaiian Pualani GLD, Starwood PLT, Shangri-La EXEC, Hilton/Marriott SLVR
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by UA Fan View Post
is there a link for this? Darn economy.
How about from the source: http://www.jetairways.com/Cultures/e...timization.htm
ORD_UA1K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 08, 5:45 am   #163
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MAA
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 1,902
Non viable social sectors - airlines are supposed to fly a certain percentage of their routes on non premium sectors (like smaller towns). The sort of places AI/IC serves with CD (alliance air) 732s flying two or three stop milk runs ... those routes are typically a dead loss for the airline flying them.

Kingfisher evidently doesnt want to put new planes with hot FAs on such routes, and is being jumped on hard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ORD_UA1K View Post
Aviation Daily reported today that the DGCA has threatened Kingfisher with the suspension of all international flights since they haven't operated an adequate number of flights on domestic 'non-viable social sectors,' whatever that means. Vijay Mallya has cut short a trip to Japan and rushed back to India, and has asked for one day's reprieve to respond.

Meanwhile, the story continues, Kingfisher will NOT be flying to the U.S. any time soon, and the BOM-LHR non-stop is not expected to start October 26. BLR-LHR has been a disaster to-date, with an average 35 passengers per flight.
hserus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 08, 11:31 am   #164
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by hserus View Post
Non viable social sectors - airlines are supposed to fly a certain percentage of their routes on non premium sectors (like smaller towns). The sort of places AI/IC serves with CD (alliance air) 732s flying two or three stop milk runs ... those routes are typically a dead loss for the airline flying them.

Kingfisher evidently doesnt want to put new planes with hot FAs on such routes, and is being jumped on hard.
Here's a link to the Aviation Week article:

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gener...0&channel=comm
alex1948 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 08, 8:50 am   #165
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 900
The latest info from the inside courtesy of my wife:

1) The crew have received their American C1/D crew visas. valid from 2008 to 2013.

2) Kingfisher management is a mess. At the moment the girls dont have any rosters. they have to phone up everyday to find out what the schedule for the next day is. Many girls have been told they have the next day off then after a few hours they have been told they have early morning flights by which time they have usually have downed more than a few drinks. total shambles. a lot of them are having less than minimum rest time as per DGCA standards but they are scared of informing the DGCA because Kingfisher will sack them as they have girls queing up to work for them.

3) The majority of the Bombay base is posted for the last two months in either Chennai or Hyderabad or Bangalore. 90 more crew are doing international training. god knows who is flying from bombay?

4) The first flight into London was a disaster service wise. While BA offer two meal services (Lunch and afternoon tea), kingfisher went ahead and offered no less than four meal services on a flight of about 10hrs. Apparently DR (paid for title) Mallya ordered a cappucino which he duly got an hour after he ordered it!

5) one girl was in London as she had operated the flight from bangalore, she receives a phone call from the rostering manager, Ian something, he tells her that she has to get back to bombay to do a goa flight. He forgot that she was in london. made me laugh when i heard that one!

6) a lot are considering quitting as kingfisher treats them like sh!t. They work totally irregular hours, management are moody and regular deny holiday requests, staff travel requests.

7) A lot of girls have eating disorders as the airline checks their weights every two months. they get grounded if they are over and are told to have the weight checked every 10 days untill they get back down again. Its not easy as these girls are consistently being put on layovers and are stuck in hotels and dont have regular eating patterns/gym patterns.

8) according to rumours, two blokes operate the london flight as its a minimum requirement according dgca for overseas flights. The blokes are confined to the galley and are not allowed to be seen on the flights by passengers. can someone confirm if this is true?

basically not eveything is as rosy as kingfisher likes to make out. They are very amateur, they dont have a CEO who runs the airlines, its VJM who runs it accorinding to his whims and he is not exactly experianced in running an airline!
d3vski is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:36 am.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0