If NZ/VA we're to breakup?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,411
If NZ/VA we're to breakup?
I've been thinking if the NZ/VA Tasman Alliance was too end, would it really be an bad thing or would we be better off.
I could see WLG/CHC getting hit by lack of frequency, we're as ex-AKL we might be better off if NZ if picks up the flights?
ex-AKL we would only lose:
AKL-MEL NZ7839 0630
AKL-SYD NZ7901 0800
AKL-BNE NZ7943 0645
AKL-BNE NZ7900 2000
AKL-OOL NZ7925 1230
With the lack of integration between NZ/VA probably wouldn't be too much of an loss. The fact you can't online check-in for VA Tasman flights, and pre-select frequent flyer seats on VA.
Surely NZ7839 and NZ7943 could both be replaced by an NZ A320 service, with NZ7901 probably isn't needed if NZ101 becomes an 787 or 777.
I could see WLG/CHC getting hit by lack of frequency, we're as ex-AKL we might be better off if NZ if picks up the flights?
ex-AKL we would only lose:
AKL-MEL NZ7839 0630
AKL-SYD NZ7901 0800
AKL-BNE NZ7943 0645
AKL-BNE NZ7900 2000
AKL-OOL NZ7925 1230
With the lack of integration between NZ/VA probably wouldn't be too much of an loss. The fact you can't online check-in for VA Tasman flights, and pre-select frequent flyer seats on VA.
Surely NZ7839 and NZ7943 could both be replaced by an NZ A320 service, with NZ7901 probably isn't needed if NZ101 becomes an 787 or 777.
#2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,100
They both need each other. Despite boardroom toy throwing I can't see this agreement ending anytime soon - right now they're working on the extension.
Last edited by sbiddle; Jun 17, 2016 at 4:40 pm
#4
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South
Posts: 127
As has been stressed repeatedly in press releases, the sell off of Air New Zealand's holding in VA is unrelated to the Tasman agreement going forward. Both parties are currently working on the extension of this agreement as the current one expires in 2018.
Last edited by waterwingsNZ; Jun 17, 2016 at 5:09 pm
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 550
I've been thinking if the NZ/VA Tasman Alliance was too end, would it really be an bad thing or would we be better off.
I could see WLG/CHC getting hit by lack of frequency, we're as ex-AKL we might be better off if NZ if picks up the flights?
ex-AKL we would only lose:
AKL-MEL NZ7839 0630
AKL-SYD NZ7901 0800
AKL-BNE NZ7943 0645
AKL-BNE NZ7900 2000
AKL-OOL NZ7925 1230
With the lack of integration between NZ/VA probably wouldn't be too much of an loss. The fact you can't online check-in for VA Tasman flights, and pre-select frequent flyer seats on VA.
Surely NZ7839 and NZ7943 could both be replaced by an NZ A320 service, with NZ7901 probably isn't needed if NZ101 becomes an 787 or 777.
I could see WLG/CHC getting hit by lack of frequency, we're as ex-AKL we might be better off if NZ if picks up the flights?
ex-AKL we would only lose:
AKL-MEL NZ7839 0630
AKL-SYD NZ7901 0800
AKL-BNE NZ7943 0645
AKL-BNE NZ7900 2000
AKL-OOL NZ7925 1230
With the lack of integration between NZ/VA probably wouldn't be too much of an loss. The fact you can't online check-in for VA Tasman flights, and pre-select frequent flyer seats on VA.
Surely NZ7839 and NZ7943 could both be replaced by an NZ A320 service, with NZ7901 probably isn't needed if NZ101 becomes an 787 or 777.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,411
I would say VA needs NZ more, than NZ needs VA on the Tasman. Without NZ, VA becomes an once daily airline on most of its Tasman routes.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,411
I guess when you don't have much choice ex-ZQN VA business looks good, ex-AKL its pretty poor for the price you pay. Usually about the same as on an NZ wide-body service.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,100
At the end of the day we know they're not really doing this for the benefit of customers despite claiming it really is a win-win for customers. We know it's to manage capacity and avoid direct competition.
Air NZ do make some dumb decisions TT, and the impact of JQ has seen this worsen for some sectors such as WLG-MEL. Historically Air NZ have cut this from 7 days in Winter due to low demand, and this year they're scrapping the Sat morning flight which means it's not possible to fly over Sat AM and back Sun PM. Air NZ will lose at least a couple of weekend trips away from me over the next couple of months due to this as I simply won't go. For a weekend in August I've had to take a day off to fly early.
JQ/QF on the other hand keep the same schedule.
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,411
Air NZ do make some dumb decisions TT, and the impact of JQ has seen this worsen for some sectors such as WLG-MEL. Historically Air NZ have cut this from 7 days in Winter due to low demand, and this year they're scrapping the Sat morning flight which means it's not possible to fly over Sat AM and back Sun PM. Air NZ will lose at least a couple of weekend trips away from me over the next couple of months due to this as I simply won't go. For a weekend in August I've had to take a day off to fly early.
Do the cost ex-WLG, make it really that much less appealing than ex-AKL? Despite all the additional capacity ex-AKL on other airlines, NZ continues to up capacity. Most days of the week AKL-SYD is get mutplie 777/787 services, and on certain days BNE/MEL are getting an afternoon 777/787 service.
#11
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: NZ*G ELT, VA-G
Posts: 3,595
I assume down the road, VA would put Tigerair on trans Tasman services at which time it would create more tension between VA and NZ. Would NZ work with Tigerair (assuming no as it would require regulatory approval)? If Tigerair is the answer to VA, then they probably don't need NZ.
#12
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
Do the cost ex-WLG, make it really that much less appealing than ex-AKL? Despite all the additional capacity ex-AKL on other airlines, NZ continues to up capacity. Most days of the week AKL-SYD is get mutplie 777/787 services, and on certain days BNE/MEL are getting an afternoon 777/787 service.
Even where it is feasible, routing via AKL usually adds 100 each way to the fare, which also makes it uncompetitive.
QF is happy. I fly them far more than I would otherwise.
#13
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,100
I assume down the road, VA would put Tigerair on trans Tasman services at which time it would create more tension between VA and NZ. Would NZ work with Tigerair (assuming no as it would require regulatory approval)? If Tigerair is the answer to VA, then they probably don't need NZ.
We've seen TT pricing head up again in the past year but much of that has been careful management of pricing by Air NZ - try and get a special fare return flight on a weekend ex Wellington and you'll find this is impossible.
The biggest issue with TT is still the tax. ~$180 in tax for a return flight is excessive IMHO.