Community
Wiki Posts
Search

2 AF Flights diverted to for security reasons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2015, 8:27 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: Disgruntled HON**, Indifferent EK Gold, skeptical BA Silver
Posts: 1,734
2 AF Flights diverted to for security reasons

AF 65 from LAX to CDG diverted to Salt Lake City
AF 55 IAD to CDG diverted to Halifax

Apparently phoned in bomb threats..

Be safe!
mamb0 is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2015, 8:37 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,424
thoughts go out to all those onboard. Scary times,
cruisr is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2015, 8:40 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: YYZ/YTZ
Programs: *A, PD
Posts: 113
The flight diverted to Halifax and the people disembarked and taken to secure part of airport, main runway is closed but the secondary is still open as per:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-s...ifax-1.3323777
TheFerret is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2015, 8:44 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 29,973
2 AF Flights diverted to for security reasons

Hoax?
enviroian is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2015, 9:56 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: Disgruntled HON**, Indifferent EK Gold, skeptical BA Silver
Posts: 1,734
Originally Posted by enviroian
Hoax?
My post is not, the phoned in bomb threats might be...
mamb0 is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2015, 11:56 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,551
Between this and the stadium in Hanover yesterday, it's looking like we may be in for a lot of last minute closures of events, aircraft diversion, etc., due to what appears to be hoax threats.
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2015, 4:08 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ORY
Programs: Flying Blue Ivory, EasyJet Plus, Club Corsair Gold, Thalys TheCard Platinum, Navigo 1-5
Posts: 1,990
There was a threatening call concerning flight AF065 from Washington.

As there's no AF065 departing from IAD (AF055) but one from LAX, AF and the authorities decided to divert both aircrafts.
Mokshu is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2015, 9:14 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
Lovely. The idiots doing this can't even look up a flight schedule correctly to find which flight number corresponds to which route?

USA media made it sound like separate threats to two distinct flights.

Did either flight have problems with crew timing out due to the diversions? OTOH, I could understand crew being upset by the circumstances and perhaps not feeling fully fit to work the next portion of the flight.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2015, 11:55 am
  #9  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,541
I was on AF 65. Crew handled it well and DL ground crew in SLC did a great job. Not an experience I would care to repeat. Pilot made a very hard landing so mechanics were looking for any structural damage. All pax interviewed by FBI
obscure2k is online now  
Old Nov 18, 2015, 12:02 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
Originally Posted by obscure2k
I was on AF 65. Crew handled it well and DL ground crew in SLC did a great job. Not an experience I would care to repeat. Pilot made a very hard landing so mechanics were looking for any structural damage. All pax interviewed by FBI
Sorry to hear that. Did you lose a day in SLC? [In a weird way, I think I would have been interested by the type of questions the investigators were asking, but I'm reluctant to ask you about that on the internet.]
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2015, 1:48 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: CMH, HNL
Programs: UA, HA
Posts: 583
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
...I could understand crew being upset by the circumstances and perhaps not feeling fully fit to work the next portion of the flight.
Wasn't there a case in the past few years (maybe several?) that highlighted the tough spot a cabin crew can be in when their opinion on "safe to fly" differs from the airline's? Anyone know AF/other airline's policy on letting cabin crew go off duty after a security incident that shakes them up, despite their being still in their duty period?

Originally Posted by obscure2k
I was on AF 65. Crew handled it well and DL ground crew in SLC did a great job. Not an experience I would care to repeat. Pilot made a very hard landing so mechanics were looking for any structural damage. All pax interviewed by FBI
Thanks for speaking up, obscure2k. Would you be willing to describe the events on landing/debrief/traveling on in greater detail? This may become a more frequent occurrence; many of us would benefit from the intel.
TheTakeOffRush is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2015, 3:12 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Accor 25+ Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Platinum for life/Club2000 Ultimate, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 21,909
Originally Posted by obscure2k
Pilot made a very hard landing so mechanics were looking for any structural damage.
The aircraft was likely very heavy with the fuel load (I don't think they had time to dump fuel in case of a bomb threat ?), hence the hard landing.
Goldorak is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 6:05 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
Originally Posted by Goldorak
The aircraft was likely very heavy with the fuel load (I don't think they had time to dump fuel in case of a bomb threat ?), hence the hard landing.
Good point.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2015, 3:30 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Programs: KLM, Enrich MAS, Emirates Skywards
Posts: 54
I am going to fly AF/KLM to South America (from KUL) in a week's time. Getting a little worried about all these incidents, and the extra security at CDG when I change flights. Anxiously watching this space for any updates.
L Lam is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2015, 5:13 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Glaschu
Programs: FB Platinum for Life; BAEC Gold Guest List; Accor Gold.
Posts: 2,549
So, what does this event tell us about the level of confidence the 'system' has in airport security?

It would seem that, despite the huge expenditure on, and significant inconvenience caused by, the tight security checks at airports (and I'm not in any way questioning the need for these), any would-be supporter of the terrorists can cause major disruption by making a simple telephone call!

Is there really so little trust in the effectiveness of TSA operations that we are prepared to so freely offer such a 'weapon of mass disruption' to the terrorists?

-- Henry
Henry III is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.