Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Proposed Class Action against Air Canada for Flight pass expiry and fees

Proposed Class Action against Air Canada for Flight pass expiry and fees

Old Sep 19, 2017, 6:55 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Titanium, National Executive
Posts: 1,586
Proposed Class Action against Air Canada for Flight pass expiry and fees

I read this in the morning and I don't see any discussion here.

http://evolinklaw.com/air-canada-expiry-classaction/
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
2017-09-19-en-News-Release.pdf (223.5 KB, 74 views)

Last edited by mendy7511; Sep 19, 2017 at 7:06 pm
mendy7511 is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 7:00 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: YXE
Posts: 3,050
A Federally regulated airline subject to provincial laws?

Didn't our founding fathers realize the absurdity of forcing nationwide business (ie: railways) to adhere to provincial laws?

<insert lawyer and ambulance chaser jokes here>

Hope AC wins this one and finally nails down the precedent that the provincial legislatures cannot regulate them.
longtimeflyin likes this.
pitz is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 7:23 pm
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: AC
Posts: 2,167
Originally Posted by pitz
A Federally regulated airline subject to provincial laws?

Didn't our founding fathers realize the absurdity of forcing nationwide business (ie: railways) to adhere to provincial laws?

<insert lawyer and ambulance chaser jokes here>

Hope AC wins this one and finally nails down the precedent that the provincial legislatures cannot regulate them.
Not only this, but the T&Cs are clear. It's not like Air Canada did something shady here.

It's like starting a class action after spending $50,000 on a car with a 4 year warranty and then saying "well, the warranty expired 4 years after I bought the car" and wanting damages because some tort was committed.
longtimeflyin is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 7:27 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Here's the original thread

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...t-pass-31.html
24left is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 7:40 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Titanium, National Executive
Posts: 1,586
Originally Posted by 24left
I think this one is for all flight passes, not just the mistake price.
mendy7511 is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 7:45 pm
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,186
Originally Posted by longtimeflyin
Not only this, but the T&Cs are clear. It's not like Air Canada did something shady here.

It's like starting a class action after spending $50,000 on a car with a 4 year warranty and then saying "well, the warranty expired 4 years after I bought the car" and wanting damages because some tort was committed.
In most (all?) jurisdictions in Canada, it's illegal to sell a gift card with an expiry date.

It doesn't matter what you put in the terms if it's not legal.

Originally Posted by 24left
This has nothing to do with that. I know you like linking to things from the past, but it would be helpful to verify that they're related first.
hoipolloi likes this.
canadiancow is online now  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 10:13 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,742
Originally Posted by longtimeflyin
Not only this, but the T&Cs are clear. It's not like Air Canada did something shady here.
That the terms were clear is not necessarily good enough.

At least in some jurisdictions these terms would be illegal. In which case they are void.
hoipolloi likes this.
Stranger is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2017, 10:25 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Delta, BC
Posts: 1,645
Originally Posted by pitz
A Federally regulated airline subject to provincial laws?

Didn't our founding fathers realize the absurdity of forcing nationwide business (ie: railways) to adhere to provincial laws?

<insert lawyer and ambulance chaser jokes here>

Hope AC wins this one and finally nails down the precedent that the provincial legislatures cannot regulate them.
Will be an interesting jurisdictional case but I think you'll find that absurdity is in the eye of the beholder and many complex cases have delved into areas of shared Provincial/Federal jurisdiction (and the dividing-line isn't necessarily all-or-none when it comes to various aspects of a business operations). One principle is "By virtue of the Federal precedence principle, in case of incompatibility, Federal law will have precedence over the provincial legislation but only to remedy such incompatibility." Not so clear-cut eh?

Another example test that is probably more appropriate was a case-study on potential airport privitization: "The test for determining the jurisdiction over an airport's activities is the "interjurisdictional immunity" test. The two-pronged test requires the federal party relying on the immunity doctrine to show that the provincial regulation impacts the core of the federal power over aeronautics and that it impairs the core of that power. The jurisprudence suggests that the content of the core of federal power involves decisions relating to the location, design and operation of aeronautics undertakings." It is easy how this case-study could be repurposed to fit the Canada Transportation Act, which governs airline operations.

So, the question is - are provincial expiry date regulations on flight-passes an impact on the core of the federal power over air transport?

Regardless, you won't likely get a court ruling that primary Federal jurisdiction excludes any and all provincial jurisdiction over the same corporate entity because it just doesn't work that way in this country.
hoipolloi likes this.
robsaw is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 3:15 am
  #9  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,220
Sure it does.

Why do you think MLLs can ignore provincial liquor laws?
KenHamer is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 4:40 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,085
The T&C are very clear. So I wouldn't necessarily agree with the concept of the action.

However, do folks really have sympathy for AC on this?

The same airline that imposes made up scam-charges on Aeroplan rewards? That lacks any sort of transparency or honesty or 1KK or R-space for upgrades? It's not like AC regularly shows any sense of moral duty, so why not join and see if it is possible to extract a pound of flesh from them.

My 2c worth.
InTheAirGuy is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 9:14 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC *P
Posts: 1,812
This is interesting.

For the provincial laws governing expiry date of gift cards, those laws do not apply to something purchased from a vendor for a specific good or a specific service. For example, if you buy a voucher which is good for a sundae from MCD before Jan 1 2018, those laws do not prevent the expiry.
mudd_stuffin is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 10:33 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Halifax
Programs: AC SE100K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Elite. NEXUS
Posts: 4,527
They might have a chance of arguing that the flight credits, on the "expiry" date turn into "cash like credit". The standard example of how things are supposed to work in Nova Scotia is that something like a $50 coupon for a $75 meal will, when it "expires", turns into a $50 coupon.

So, if successful, it would be a question of measuring fair market value of the residual credits.
RangerNS is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 11:11 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,742
Originally Posted by InTheAirGuy
The T&C are very clear. So I wouldn't necessarily agree with the concept of the action.
Noi matter how clear, they don't override legislation.
hoipolloi likes this.
Stranger is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 11:18 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: YUL
Programs: Super Elite 100K
Posts: 828
Vive la difference!

Originally Posted by longtimeflyin
Not only this, but the T&Cs are clear. It's not like Air Canada did something shady here.

It's like starting a class action after spending $50,000 on a car with a 4 year warranty and then saying "well, the warranty expired 4 years after I bought the car" and wanting damages because some tort was committed.
Right, but here's the beauty of Quebec and our codified set of laws in our Civil Code - the Civil Code outlines our rights and obligations here in Quebec, and explicitly states that rights and obligations cannot be signed away, regardless of what we as consumers agree to. If the clauses are contrary to our Civil Code laws, they are without effect, or, meaningless in the eyes of the court. So, even if we are dumb enough as clients to sign, what in effect are actually contracts of lesion, here in Quebec we get automatic protections from such abuses without the bother of having to comb through related jurisprudence to try and make our case.
hoipolloi likes this.
willflyforfood is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2017, 11:57 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,742
Originally Posted by willflyforfood
Right, but here's the beauty of Quebec and our codified set of laws in our Civil Code - the Civil Code outlines our rights and obligations here in Quebec, and explicitly states that rights and obligations cannot be signed away, regardless of what we as consumers agree to. If the clauses are contrary to our Civil Code laws, they are without effect, or, meaningless in the eyes of the court. So, even if we are dumb enough as clients to sign, what in effect are actually contracts of lesion, here in Quebec we get automatic protections from such abuses without the bother of having to comb through related jurisprudence to try and make our case.
That's the same everywhere. Contracts cannot override legislation.
Stranger is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.