Exclusive: SFO near miss might have triggered ‘greatest aviation disaster in history’
#16
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,918
I will await the Aviation Herald report. However, I do wish Air Canada would be more reassuring with its public statement.
"Air Canada flight AC759 from Toronto was preparing to land at SFO Friday night when the aircraft initiated a go-around. The aircraft landed normally without incident. We are still investigating the circumstances."
Not reassuring to me. No one wants to be part of a Pan Am- KLM Tenerife re-enactment. However, for some people the AC statement will suffice.
edit: Just listened to the ATC again, AC pilot did inquire as to the "runway" and this suggested he was unsure. That's the impression I have. An ATC person that was "listening" would have picked up on that uncertainty, although aside from reconfirming runway, I don't know what else ATC could do. Anyway, I will await Simon's reliable info.
"Air Canada flight AC759 from Toronto was preparing to land at SFO Friday night when the aircraft initiated a go-around. The aircraft landed normally without incident. We are still investigating the circumstances."
Not reassuring to me. No one wants to be part of a Pan Am- KLM Tenerife re-enactment. However, for some people the AC statement will suffice.
edit: Just listened to the ATC again, AC pilot did inquire as to the "runway" and this suggested he was unsure. That's the impression I have. An ATC person that was "listening" would have picked up on that uncertainty, although aside from reconfirming runway, I don't know what else ATC could do. Anyway, I will await Simon's reliable info.
Last edited by Transpacificflyer; Jul 10, 2017 at 9:52 pm
#17
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OGG, YYC
Programs: AA, AC
Posts: 3,697
I was being lazy
It looks like less than 30 seconds between go around and overhead the taxiway. That would mean he was at about 300-400 feet. Pretty close to touchdown but lots of time to initiate the go around.
I'm inclined to believe the crew was sufficiently uncomfortable with the visual picture that there was zero chance they would have continued with the approach.
It looks like less than 30 seconds between go around and overhead the taxiway. That would mean he was at about 300-400 feet. Pretty close to touchdown but lots of time to initiate the go around.
I'm inclined to believe the crew was sufficiently uncomfortable with the visual picture that there was zero chance they would have continued with the approach.
#19
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OGG, YYC
Programs: AA, AC
Posts: 3,697
#20
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MEX
Programs: AC E75K
Posts: 4,171
Wow.
As I briefly alluded to here, I was on AC759 on 7/7. After flying in from TXL via FRA and YYZ that day, I was super tired and eager to get home. The go-around annoyed me at the time, but I had no idea how dangerous the situation was. Now I have chills going down my spine.
What do you guys think? Will I ever hear from AC with anything like an apology?
As I briefly alluded to here, I was on AC759 on 7/7. After flying in from TXL via FRA and YYZ that day, I was super tired and eager to get home. The go-around annoyed me at the time, but I had no idea how dangerous the situation was. Now I have chills going down my spine.
What do you guys think? Will I ever hear from AC with anything like an apology?
#21
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
I was being lazy
It looks like less than 30 seconds between go around and overhead the taxiway. That would mean he was at about 300-400 feet. Pretty close to touchdown but lots of time to initiate the go around.
I'm inclined to believe the crew was sufficiently uncomfortable with the visual picture that there was zero chance they would have continued with the approach.
It looks like less than 30 seconds between go around and overhead the taxiway. That would mean he was at about 300-400 feet. Pretty close to touchdown but lots of time to initiate the go around.
I'm inclined to believe the crew was sufficiently uncomfortable with the visual picture that there was zero chance they would have continued with the approach.
Seems even the tower didn't realize something was amiss until the UA pilot complained. I don't know if they would have realized their mistake in time, but they had already made one serious mistake. And there's a long history of airline incidents as a result of a series of cascading errors.
Anything beyond what actually happened is just speculation.
#22
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OGG, YYC
Programs: AA, AC
Posts: 3,697
Wow.
As I briefly alluded to here, I was on AC759 on 7/7. After flying in from TXL via FRA and YYZ that day, I was super tired and eager to get home. The go-around annoyed me at the time, but I had no idea how dangerous the situation was. Now I have chills going down my spine.
What do you guys think? Will I ever hear from AC with anything like an apology?
As I briefly alluded to here, I was on AC759 on 7/7. After flying in from TXL via FRA and YYZ that day, I was super tired and eager to get home. The go-around annoyed me at the time, but I had no idea how dangerous the situation was. Now I have chills going down my spine.
What do you guys think? Will I ever hear from AC with anything like an apology?
#23
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
Wow.
As I briefly alluded to here, I was on AC759 on 7/7. After flying in from TXL via FRA and YYZ that day, I was super tired and eager to get home. The go-around annoyed me at the time, but I had no idea how dangerous the situation was. Now I have chills going down my spine.
What do you guys think? Will I ever hear from AC with anything like an apology?
As I briefly alluded to here, I was on AC759 on 7/7. After flying in from TXL via FRA and YYZ that day, I was super tired and eager to get home. The go-around annoyed me at the time, but I had no idea how dangerous the situation was. Now I have chills going down my spine.
What do you guys think? Will I ever hear from AC with anything like an apology?
#24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SJC/YUL
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,877
This is really shocking. After the Asiana pilot error incident a few years ago, that airline was banned from SFO for 45 days. I think this is significantly more serious. I doubt it will happen, but a 6-month ban of Air Canada seems appropriate
#25
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OGG, YYC
Programs: AA, AC
Posts: 3,697
Why would they ask the the tower about lights on the runway? Wouldn't that have been the time to abort?
Seems even the tower didn't realize something was amiss until the UA pilot complained. I don't know if they would have realized their mistake in time, but they had already made one serious mistake. And there's a long history of airline incidents as a result of a series of cascading errors.
Anything beyond what actually happened is just speculation.
Seems even the tower didn't realize something was amiss until the UA pilot complained. I don't know if they would have realized their mistake in time, but they had already made one serious mistake. And there's a long history of airline incidents as a result of a series of cascading errors.
Anything beyond what actually happened is just speculation.
The other question I would ask is was he tracking the localizer? If he was, then why didn't he notice being off course? If he wasn't -- then why wasn't he?
And as you noted, the tower didn't notice he wasn't aligned with 28R. That's a bit surprising.
#27
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,001
this happened with Delta in 2009; and the pilots were not disciplined. [and by happened, I mean they actually landed on the taxiway]
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...axiway-336663/
And with Alaska in 2015:
https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/...or-runway.html
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...axiway-336663/
And with Alaska in 2015:
https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/...or-runway.html
Of course this is an attention grabbing headline. I'm not sure if physics would allow for a collision with all 5 a/c that would have killed more people than Tenerife.
As for what happened.
The AC pilot suspected something wasn't right, the UA pilot and the controller knew something wasn't right. Appropriate action was taken.
An investigation will take place.
The runways and taxiways at SFO, like SEA are close together. This increases the chance of error. We don't know if localizer guidance was functioning that night.
Stuff like this happens a lot more than you nervous armchair investigators think. Unless you've sat in a cockpit on a dark night going into an airport full of bright lights, you may not fully appreciate what's happening.
One of the first rules of flying, don't land on a blue runway.
#30
Join Date: Jul 2012
Programs: Delta Gold, Alaska Gold 75K, LATAM Black
Posts: 3,393
I am glad the pilot came to his senses and everything ended just fine.