Last edit by: 24left
Jan 18 2021 TC issues Airworthiness Directive for the 737 MAX
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html
Cabin photos
Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html
Cabin Layout
Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html
- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.
Routes
The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:
YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html
Cabin photos
Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html
Cabin Layout
Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html
- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.
Routes
The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:
YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet
#376
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
#377
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
......But take a look at AS's 737-900s -- they fit it with the new Boring Sky Interior design (so no ugly 1950-era overhead panels like what UAdbaCO has on their 737s). Plus AS 739s use the new Boring Space Bin design for the overhead -- and those can fit moar rollaboards than conventional design
It would be a huge win on the customer experience if AC did the same
But I doubt AC will spend that extra money ... I mean if all they can afford for food is pickles in the MLL ....
It would be a huge win on the customer experience if AC did the same
But I doubt AC will spend that extra money ... I mean if all they can afford for food is pickles in the MLL ....
I've already agreed with you on the AS 739 experiences I had on flights a few months back, including the ANC-LAX red-eye.
I really liked the new cabin. At least the seats AS chose were extremely comfortable and I was in Y. I noticed everyone put almost everything up in the bins as there was plenty of space.
I've also flew a number of 738s on AA. The new ones were great flying experiences.
But to maradori's point, it's really a matter of what AC decides to spend or not spend on the interior that will determine the passenger experience.
#378
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
Not surprising since Germany was a major backer of Airbus Industries and LH an instrument in ensuring a launch airline for most of its offerings. The country is also the location of several major sub-component plants, the major aircraft finishing centre for Airbus, and a host of suppliers. That's why LH phased out its 737s and is doing the same with 744s, though did take the 748 soon to be its only Boeing aircraft.
#379
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
CP was indeed a "great airline" and provided a very classy service on their DC10s both with First Class and Royal Canadian Class. Flew both many, many times to Australia and New Zealand during the 1980s. AC also provided a fine First Class service on its L1011s before it downgraded the front cabin to Executive Class.
#380
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
But take a look at AS's 737-900s -- they fit it with the new Boring Sky Interior design (so no ugly 1950-era overhead panels like what UAdbaCO has on their 737s). Plus AS 739s use the new Boring Space Bin design for the overhead -- and those can fit moar rollaboards than conventional design
It would be a huge win on the customer experience if AC did the same
But I doubt AC will spend that extra money ... I mean if all they can afford for food is pickles in the MLL ....
It would be a huge win on the customer experience if AC did the same
But I doubt AC will spend that extra money ... I mean if all they can afford for food is pickles in the MLL ....
#381
Join Date: Sep 2016
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 57
#382
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: YYZ most of the time
Programs: AC SE100K MM, Princess Elite
Posts: 3,921
But take a look at AS's 737-900s -- they fit it with the new Boring Sky Interior design (so no ugly 1950-era overhead panels like what UAdbaCO has on their 737s). Plus AS 739s use the new Boring Space Bin design for the overhead -- and those can fit moar rollaboards than conventional design
There are quite a few UA B737s with the "BORING" Sky Interior. Not all of them are ugly 1950s era overheads.... Perhaps we should have official fact checkers like during the US election.
#383
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ, SFO
Programs: AS 100K, UA*S, IHG Plat, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond | Formerly: AC Super Elite
Posts: 2,476
I guess this is the time that I admit I "MAY" becoming a UA apologist like so many are AC apologists.
There are quite a few UA B737s with the "BORING" Sky Interior. Not all of them are ugly 1950s era overheads.... Perhaps we should have official fact checkers like during the US election.
There are quite a few UA B737s with the "BORING" Sky Interior. Not all of them are ugly 1950s era overheads.... Perhaps we should have official fact checkers like during the US election.
Although I don't have any official info which Eewnited 737s have and do not have boring sky interiors, the closest thing I found is https://sites.google.com/site/united...fleet-tracking
When clicking on the "39" tab, I concur with your statement that "not all of them" are ugly 1950s era overheads. However, the spreadsheet also shows that quite a few of them 1. have only sky interiors without space bins, 2. have neither. The numbers are even more abysmal when you click the "38" and "3G" tab and only a handful or two of them (assuming you have some REALLY big hands) have the sky interior
....
All that being said, my original point still remains. For non-6ft4 flyers like myself, whether the airframe is A32x or is B73x doesn't matter as much as the inside of the aircraft.
I kind of like the new A321 interiors (when flying SFO-PHL on US A321, it was always a coin toss whether you got an old or new interior), but man, those Boring Space Bins are a total game changer for us who fly in the back
Hopefully AC gets space bins .....
#384
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: *G^2, Bonvoyed, NEXUS
Posts: 3,506
#386
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
Personally I like the sound, it's really easy to tell (by the sound pitch) that the engines are working properly and at the appropriate power setting. ^
2. A32x has that APU dog-bark sound
3. IMO, 737 sounds like it works the engines harder during the takeoff roll
Anyone who has had a close-up view of its wing knows there are some stretches built-in to it.
I have flown in a CRJ1000 a couple of times, back of the plane is fun to watch the flex of the airframe during turbulence. ^
Last edited by jaysona; Feb 14, 2017 at 5:48 pm Reason: clarrify statement.
#387
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
I have flown in a CRJ1000 a couple of times, back of the plane is fun to watch the flex of the airframe during turbulence. ^
Memories of the 707-320, again...
#388
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Aberdeenshire
Programs: BA Exec Silver, Aeroplan, Hilton Honors Gold
Posts: 1,125
Will AC not include setback screens on the 737MAX?
AA recently announced that their 737MAX fleet would not have built-in IFE, instead improving in-flight wifi so pax can watch content on their own devices. Does anyone know if AC will do the same, especially given that they do this on Rouge?
#389
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 5,951
Will AC not include setback screens on the 737MAX?
Find out this thursday on the next ep of Dragon Ball Z in YVR, YUL or YYZ for the "Futurrrrr of AC event"
Find out this thursday on the next ep of Dragon Ball Z in YVR, YUL or YYZ for the "Futurrrrr of AC event"
Last edited by Jumper Jack; Feb 7, 2017 at 12:27 pm