Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Nortel vs. Beer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2001, 12:41 pm
  #1  
ALW
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 8,564
Nortel vs. Beer

As discussed at www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum5/HTML/003744.html

I first saw this in the Globe&Mail so I have no idea who wrote it first. Found it at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/finavenues/message/193


Have some more beers! Its better for your pocket. Here's why.

On July 26, 2000, two friends, Jim and John, each got a $1000 bonus at work. (They both work for Nortel Networks, where in the summer of 2000, there was LOTS of money around for bonuses). Jim, being an intelligent, financially conscientious person, put the whole $1000 into Nortel Networks stock. With his $1000, and the transaction cost of $35, he was able to purchase 7 shares at $123 each.

Having watched the Nortel stock climb and climb, he felt very good about this investment, happy that he is preparing for the future. John, being a more care-free sort, did something slightly different with his $1000. John borrowed a friend's truck, and proceeded to the Beer Store, where he purchased 33 cases of beer. John also felt very good about his investment: 33 cases x 24 = is 792 bottles of beer! John, also being an intelligent guy, although perhaps not as forward-thinking as Jim, calculated that he could drink about 15 bottles per week, and he wouldn't have to buy beer for a whole year. Jim, of course, was appalled by John's purchase, and berated him constantly about it.

As months went by, Jim excitedly watched the stock prices, and saw it start to dwindle. "It'll go back up", he'd say to John. John, who has been reaping the benefits of his investment on a daily basis, would reply, "Ya, it will. Hang in there buddy ". Months went by, and the value of the stock continued to fall, and there was the beginnings of a noticeable dent in the beer pile. Midwinter came, Jim's stock had fallen to about half of it's original value, and John's beer was about half gone. Jim, being sure that the stock had hit rock-bottom, still was berating John for his frivolous purchase, telling him "Your beer will be gone in six months! Who knows what my stock will be worth!!"

Well, summer has come, and hard times at Nortel continue. Bad news: Both John and Jim have been affected by the layoffs. Last week, in order to raise some cash to help through the rough time, Jim sold his 7 shares, at that day's value of $12*, and got $84, then after paying the $35 transaction fee, he only had $49.

Jim stopped by John's house later that day (everyone needs their friend's during rough times), and as luck would have it, there were two bottles of John's beer left. John, being a good, compassionate friend, offered to share his last two bottles of beer with his friend. Jim appreciated the gesture, and enjoyed the cold beer on the hot summer's day, but he felt a bit guilty. "At least I got fifty bucks back out of it - you have nothing now.", he said. "That's ok.", replied John. "Perhaps you can help me, I need to return all these empties.", he added as his other friend with the truck pulled in. So, they loaded up the truck, and proceeded off to the beer store. Upon arrival at the beer store, they unloaded the empties, feeling a little grim. John went to the counter, and collected his refund for the bottles. "33 cases x 24 bottles, at 10 cents per bottle, that comes to $79.20", the
friendly Beer Store clerk said to John as he handed him the money. Jim was speechless. Poor guy.

Can you imagine how you would feel if you just discovered that over the course of the last year, your $1000 stock investment left you with $50, and taking same 1000, buying beer, and drinking it, would leave you with $80. I'll leave it up to the reader to come up with they're own "moral to the story".

Have a nice day, and happy investing.

Editor
CoolAvenues.com

[*It's now half that -aw]



[This message has been edited by Andrew Webber (edited 10-17-2001).]
ALW is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2001, 2:19 pm
  #2  
Company Representative - Air Canada
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 24,215
Thanks for posting this...
Andrew Yiu is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2001, 3:57 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,392
Actually I wish you HADN'T posted this .. .
back seat is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2001, 4:52 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
Thanks, Andrew. Iguess that's partly why I decided to take the money I made on AC's share buy-back and put it into Sleeman's. As for all that Nortel I got stuck with when Bell split...
Shareholder is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2001, 5:06 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: YXU, ON Canada
Programs: AC LT E50K; AC*MM; SPG LT Gold
Posts: 4,665
I didn't feel that I was stuck with it when Bell split with Nortel. Now I just pretend that it was all a dream and that I hadn't really wanted to cash in at $124 and buy an Infiniti
Academic is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.