Originally Posted by
We Will Never Forget
I'm not understanding why this would ever come into question.
First: If the airline issues the ticket, the person has been granted access to the sterile area.
Second: If a person has no ID, they receive secondary screening. The permission for access is not revoked, just the process of getting there changes.
Third: If a person refuses an Explosive Trace Portal screening, they are screened as though they have alarmed, thus patted down and bags are tested by the ETD.
This is standard procedure, so again, why would there ever be a problem?
According to the letter, a pax does not have the right to refuse using the ETP. I know some airports were asking people if they wanted to try it back when they were undergoing trials, but now that they are online, there's no asking.