FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Citi AA credit cards, except Executive. (2013-2014)
Old Apr 1, 2014, 12:59 pm
  #4494  
thepaul500
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Midwest
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by sdsearch
That example doesn't prove that it's the Exec.

First of all, please understand why it's a 65 day "rule". The actual Citi language is 60 days, but they are notorious for counting days wrong, so 65 is a number with a fudge factor added which historically has counteracted all Citi wrong counting of 60. Maybe they simply counted days wrong in the direction favorable to you on this occasion?

Second, how do you know it's not the Biz that's on a separate clock? So many things are separate about the Biz, that even though Biz has a 65 day clock, and personal has a 65 day clock, they might be separate clocks. (Because except with the Exec youi can't churn personal that fast, we don't have enough data points, I don't think, to determine for sure whether they are separate clocks or one combined clock.)

And if you don't know what your data point proves, it can be dangerous for the next person to assume what it proves, when it might be proving something else.

Since the 65 day clock was determined during an era where most people were just churning personal cards only, and it was reaffirmed in the new era when people are mostly churning business cards only, we have not had an era with enough churning of both back and forth by enough people who "pushed" the timing to know whether the clocks are separate or one united clock.

But since the 65 day clock has been a clock that applied to all personal cards before, and was always assessed before at a level that doesn't know what kind of card you're applying for, I find it much less likely that it's the Exec card that violates the 65 day clock than that either it's the biz card or just that 65 and 54 are equally likely miscounts of 60.

(The 8 part is relatively new, because as recently as a year ago, you could still apply for two cards "at once", and thus most people simply applied for 2 every 65 days. It was only once 2-at-once was "outlawed" that the 8 part was developed. But the limit on 2 card applications every "60" (65 to be safe) days has been a Citi rule for over a decade.)
Whoa, easy there, please go read the exec thread for other examples of the same thing as I posted, except some of these being 3 exec cards in less than 60 days. I think no one "knows" how/what/why Citi does what it does, but to assume these rules are written in stone is wrong, unless there is a whole group of us trolling for fun. This whole thing is YMMV, as I said before, now the 8/65 might be good guidelines if churning, it may be possible to do better.
thepaul500 is offline