Originally Posted by
willpolice4food
"Whistleblowers should not have to guess whether information that they reasonably believe evidences waste, fraud, abuse, illegalities or public dangers might be later designated as SSI [sensitive security information] and therefore should not be disclosed," Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner wrote in an amicus curiae brief to MSPB supporting former air marshal Robert MacLean. "Rather than making the wrong guess, a would-be whistleblower will likely choose to remain silent to avoid risking the individual's employment."
http://www.federaltimes.com/article/...S03/108260301/
Bolding mine: And this is the key as in any whistle-blower case, the entity being accused cannot change the rules of the game after the fact. Not saying the whistle-blower FAM is right or wrong but rather that you can't change the rules of the game after the fact and expect to get away with it.