0 min left

Family Removed from United Flight After Requesting Nut-Free Environment

22_UANuts

The Irish Independent reported that a couple and their daughter were removed from a Dublin-bound United Airlines flight after requesting a nut-free environment due to the girl’s severe allergy.

According to the report published Wednesday, an Irish family requested that the crew of a United Airlines flight from Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) to Dublin Airport (DUB) not serve nuts during the trip.

The request followed an incident earlier this month when the couple’s 4-year old daughter, who had not previously been diagnosed with food allergies, consumed cashews while the family was on a flight from DUB to EWR. The cashews triggered a severe anaphylactic reaction in under a minute. Fortunately for the child, there was an allergy specialist on the flight who was able to administer adrenaline.

The flight, which had already been in the air for two hours, turned around and returned to Dublin so the child could receive medical treatment. After the girl was treated and discharged from Temple Street Children’s Hospital the next day, United accommodated the family’s request not to serve nuts on their flight from DUB to EWR.

When the family requested a nut-free environment on their return flight from EWR to DUB, they were asked to leave the plane. United reportedly agreed to provide a nut-free environment for the family on a flight scheduled for the following day.

“My daughter was extremely upset by the whole thing, as was I. My husband was angry with how quickly the whole thing escalated from what seemed like a simple request,” the girl’s mother, who was not identified, told the Independent, “But that seemed to be a big issue because this was part of the United service and they said they didn’t advertise themselves as a nut-free airline.”

This story closely follows recent reports of a Ryanair passenger who refused multiple requests from passengers and flight crew to refrain from eating nuts, causing a 4-year-old girl seated nearby to have a severe anaphylactic reaction. The man has since been banned from flying Ryanair for two years.

There is some debate as to whether or not nuts and peanuts consumed by other passengers can cause an allergic reaction in a passenger who merely smells the food. Citing five studies over the last 10 years, allergy specialist Matthew Greenhawt told Allergic Living Magazine that such concerns are overblown.“It is highly unlikely for a passenger to inhale nut protein from someone consuming nuts a few rows in front of him/her. There is no evidence that has been able to show that such dust circulates.”

While United does not bill itself as a nut-free airline, the company does list a specific peanut allergy policy on its website, which states:

United does not board pre-packaged peanuts, but unfortunately we cannot guarantee that a flight will be peanut-free. It’s not possible to ensure that customers will not bring food items onboard that contain nuts, and for a variety of operational reasons, we cannot guarantee peanut-free flights, offer peanut-free zones, or remove any onboard products based on individual customer requests.

United’s allergy policy puts all onus on passengers, encouraging anyone who flies with the airline to “review any health concerns with their physicians prior to flying.”

[Photo: United Airlines]

Comments are Closed.
10 Comments
R
realfortin August 27, 2014

The girl had a severe allergic reaction because she ate a cashew. It doesn't mean she will suffer because some guy 3 seats back eats cashews. The family has overblown this.

L
lighthand August 25, 2014

The few times I flew with Unite, they never had impress me that much. But this time I have to take my hat off to them, to turn the flight around AND arrange for a next day Nut free flight surely is not chump change. I mean to have a real nut free flight, they would need to force ventilate the cabin (rid it of nut particles), and also inform all passengers coming on the flight not to consume nuts just before boarding plus not bring onboard any products with nuts in it.

P
pumarega August 24, 2014

This is nuts!

O
Occupationalhazard August 24, 2014

I can understand why the airline had issues. The headlines would just scream.. “girl dies on United flight”. =========================================== This. It seems like this family isn't really giving the airline a ton of notice--first when they are already on the plane and the second (apparently) as they were boarding. But I guess it was fine for them to eff-over everyone else on the plane by four plus hours (two out, two back, plus any associated delays), not to mention any missed connections and other inconvenience. [i]“My daughter was extremely upset by the whole thing, as was I. My husband was angry with how quickly the whole thing escalated from what seemed like a simple request,” the girl’s mother, who was not identified, told the Independent, “But that seemed to be a big issue because this was part of the United service and they said they didn’t advertise themselves as a nut-free airline.”[i] Is it a "simple request" or is it that *someone* thinks that everyone else should accommodate them on short notice? The kid has a medical issue and the airline handled it. As [b]Annalisa12[/b] correctly points out, if they'd flown and the girl had a fatal reaction, we'd be reading an article entitled "UNITED KILLED MY CHILD!!!' Srsly. Stop being upset about how inconvenienced you are (no mention of all the people you screwed over on the first flight) and be happy that the airline did, in fact accommodate you. O/H

M
mapu August 24, 2014

"simple request"?!?!? Seriously?